Our research aims to investigate the paradox of authenticity and standardization in the context of translocality. This chapter introduces the research approach, country selection, and case selection. Because this topic is new, we need explorative research. A series of Chinese restaurant cases are selected that are expected to differ in their combination of the two concepts, authenticity and standardization, and that are also informative for better understanding the paradox of combined use of these concepts in a context characterized by the third concept, translocality.
- Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative report, 8(4), 597–607.Google Scholar
- Goodman, S. G. D. (2006). Shanxi as translocal imaginary: reforming the local. 56–73. In: Oakes, T. and Schein L. Eds. Translocal China Linkages, identities, and the reimagining of space. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
- Winter, G. (2000). A comparative discussion of the notion of validity in qualitative and quantitative research. The qualitative report, 4(3), 4.Google Scholar
- Yin K. R. (2008). Case study research: design and methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar