Advertisement

Writing the Review of Literature in a Thesis

  • A. M. Quraishi
Chapter

Abstract

  • Literature review is the search and critical appraisal of existing literature on a topic.

  • It helps in formulating a research question after finding a knowledge gap.

  • The research topic provides the roadmap to literature search.

  • Literature search sources are scanned with the help of search tools.

  • The retrieved data is put through the sieve of PICO format to shortlist articles.

  • The literature is critically appraised analysed and synthesised.

  • The results are compared and contrasted.

  • The literature review is organised and written systematically.

  • The knowledge gaps are highlighted and scope for future research brought out.

References

  1. 1.
    Hart C. Doing a Literature Review. London: Sage Publications; 1998.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coughlan M, Cronin P. Doing a literature review in nursing, health and social care. London: Sage Publications; 2017.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Booth A, Papaioannou D, Sutton A. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2012.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane collaboration. 2011.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gash S. Effective literature searching for research. 2nd ed. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Ltd.; 1999.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mahid SS, Hornung CA, Minor KS, Turina M, Galandiuk S. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis for the surgeon scientist. Br J Surg. 2006;93(11):1315–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    SearchCIO.com Acronym and term Definitions: Boolean. http://searchcio.techtarget.com/gDefinition/0,294236,sid19_gci211695,00.html. (Last accessed: 27 Aug 2017).
  9. 9.
    Ridley D. The literature review: a step-by-step guide for students. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2012.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parkes J, Hyde C, Deeks J, Milne R. Teaching critical appraisal skills in health care settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;3:CD001270.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khalid K, Regina K, Jos K, Gerd A. Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine. 2nd ed. New York: CRC Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    British Medical Association. Reference styles: Harvard and Vancouver. Available from: http://www.bma.org.uk/library_medline/electronic_resources/factsheets/LIBReferenceStyles.jsp [last accessed on 27 Aug 2017].
  13. 13.
    Das N, Panjabi M. Plagiarism: Why is it such a big issue for medical writers? Perspect Clin Res. 2011;2(2):67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kumar PM, Priya NS, Musalaiah S, Nagasree M. Knowing and avoiding plagiarism during scientific writing. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4(Suppl 3):S193–8.  https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.141957.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. M. Quraishi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryGovernment Medical CollegeNagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations