Advertisement

Empirical Analysis of Probabilistic Bounds

  • R. Swarnalatha
  • V. Kumaran
Chapter
Part of the Asset Analytics book series (ASAN)

Abstract

Empirical analysis is done to the sharp bounds presented in [12] for the probability of union of arbitrary events following monotonic distribution. Given any number of binomial moments, the closed form sharp bounds for the probability of union of events are presented in [12]. In this paper, we analyze the bounds and the probability distribution generated from the optimal basis for different monotonic functions with different monotonicity.

Keywords

Discrete moment problem Binomial moment Random variable 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author thanks MHRD (Government of India) and National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli, India for financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Boole G (1854) Laws of thought. Dover, NewyorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boros E, Prekopa A (1989) Closed form two-sided bounds for probabilities that at least r and exactly r out of n events occur. Math Oper Res 14:317–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boros E, Prekopa A (1989) Probabilistic bounds and algorithms for the maximum satisfiability problem. Ann Oper Res 21:109–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boros E, Scozzari A, Tardella F, Veneziani P (2014) Polynomially computable bounds for the probability of the union of events. Math Oper Res 39:1311–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bukszar J, Madi-Nagy G, Szantai T (2012) Computing bounds for the probability of the union of events by different methods. Ann Oper Res 201:63–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chung KL, Erdos P (1952) On the application of the Borel-Cantelli lemma. Trans Am Math Soc 72:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dawson DA, Sankoff D (1967) An inequality for probability. Proc Am Math Soc 18:504–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frechet M (1940/43) Les Probabilities Associees a un systeme d’Evenement Compatibles et Dependants, Actualites Scientifique et Industrielles, Nos. 859,942, ParisGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gao L, Prekopa A (2001) Lower and Upper bounds for the probability of at least r and exactly r out of n events that occur, Rutcor Research reportGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hunter D (1976) Bounds for the probability of a union. J Appl Probab 13:597–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumaran V, Prekopa A (2005) Bounds on probability of a finite union. In: Mohan SR, Neogy SK (eds) Operations research with economic and industrial applications: emerging trends. Anamaya Publishers, New Delhi, India, pp 77–84Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumaran V, Swarnalatha R (2017) Bounds for the probability of union of events following monotonic distribution. Discrete Appl Math 223:98–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kwerel SM (1975) Most stringent bounds on aggregated probabilities of partially specified dependent probability systems. J Am Stat Assoc 70:472–479Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prekopa A (1988) Boole-Bonferroni inequalities and linear programming. Oper Res 36:145–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prekopa A (1995) Stochastic programming. Kluwer Academic Publishers, NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prekopa A, Gao L (2005) Bounding the probability of the union of events by aggregation and disaggregation in linear programs. Discrete Appl Math 145:444–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prekopa A, Ninh A, Alexe G (2016) On the relationship between the discrete and continuous bounding moment problems and their numerical solutions. Ann Oper Res 238:521–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prekopa A, Subasi M, Subasi E (2008) Sharp bounds for the probability of the union of events under unimodal condition. Eur J Pure Appl Math 1:60–81Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sathe YS, Pradhan M, Shah SP (1980) Inequalities for the probability of the occurrence of at least \(m\) out of \(n\) events. J Appl Probab 17:1127–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Subasi E, Subasi M, Prekopa A (2009) Discrete moment problem with distributions known to be unimodal. Math Inequalities Appl 1:587–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Swarnalatha R, Kumaran V (2017) Bounds for the probability of the union of events with unimodality. Ann Oper Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2629-6
  22. 22.
    Unuvar M, Ozguven EE, Prekopa A (2015) Optimal capacity design under \(k\)-out-of-\(n\) and consecutive \(k\)-out-of-\(n\) type probabilistic constraints. Ann Oper Res 226:643–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Veneziani P (2002) New Bonferroni-type inequalities, Rutcor Research reportGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yoda K, Prekopa A (2016) Improved bounds on the probability of the union of events some of whose intersections are empty. Oper Res Lett 44(1):39–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of Technology TiruchirappalliTiruchirappalliIndia

Personalised recommendations