Global Crisis in Higher Education: Is Merit Being Trampled by Marketing and Money?

  • Arup Maharatna


We have shown in the preceding chapter how a concerted ‘capture’ of the most important domains of education and educational thinking by neo-liberal economic perspectives since the 1950s has impelled eventually a momentous (global) shift towards narrowing the essence of education down to merely ‘learning’ of a bundle of productive and/or marketable skills through educational investment, with an overriding motive of reaping measurable pecuniary ‘gains’—both private and societal.


  1. Adelman, N.E. 1989. The Case for Integrating Academic and Vocational Education. Washington, DC: National Assessment of Vocational Education.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, Ronald. 2003. Beyond All Reason: Living with Ideology in the University. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bodilly, S., K. Ramsey, C. Stasz, and R. Eden. 1993. Integrating Academic and Vocational Education: Lessons from Eight Early Innovators. Office of Vocational and Adult Education, US Department of Education (Accessed Online).Google Scholar
  4. Bothwell, E. 2017. Universities ‘Generates £95 Billion for UK Economy’. Times Higher Education, 16 October.Google Scholar
  5. Chakrabarty, R. 2016. Problems Plaguing Medical Education: Why India Suffers a Severe Lack of Quality Doctors. India Today in Education, 6 July.Google Scholar
  6. Chatterjee, T.K. 2018. Learning as an Enterprise. The Statesman 156, 4 July 2018.Google Scholar
  7. Field, A.J. 1976. Educational Reform and Manufacturing Development in Mid-Nineteenth Century Massachusetts. The Journal of Economic History 36 (1): 263–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flexner, A. 1910. Medical Education in the United States and Canada. Bulletin Number Four, The Carnegie Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Grubb, W.N. 2004. The Anglo-American Approach to Vocationalism: The Economic Roles of Education in England. Research Paper 52, Centre on Skills, Knowledge, and Organisational Performance, Oxford and Warwick Universities.Google Scholar
  10. Hanson, C. 2004. Review of Barnett, R., Beyond All Reason. Education Review, March Issue.Google Scholar
  11. Hyslop-Margison, E.J., and A.M. Sears. 2006. Neo-Liberalism, Globalization and Human Capital Learning: Reclaiming Education for Democratic Citizenship. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Innes, J.T., P.B. Jacobson, and R.T. Pellegrain. 1965. The Economic Returns to Education: A Survey of Findings. Eugene: University of Oregon.Google Scholar
  13. Jenvey, N. 2014. The Contribution of Universities to the Economy. University World News (315) 11 April. Accessed from on 28 December 2017.
  14. Johnson, G.E. 1984. Subsidies for Higher Education. Journal of Labour Economics 2 (3): 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leslie, Larry L., and Paul T. Brinkman. 1988. The Economic Value of Higher Education. New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  16. Myklebust, J.P., and B. O’Malley. 2017. LERU Universities Contribute €100 Billion to Economy. University World News (00486) 12 December. Accessed from on 12 December 2017.
  17. Park, T. 2011. Academic Capitalism and Its Impact on the American Professoriate. The Journal of the Professoriate 6 (1): 84–99.Google Scholar
  18. Psacharopoulos, G. 1977. The Perverse Effects of Public Subsidisation of Education, or, How Equitable is Free Education? Comparative Education Review 22 (1): 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ram, Rati. 1982. Public Subsidization of Schooling and Inequality of Educational Access. Comparative Education Review 26 (1) (February): 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Russell, Bertrand. 1959. The Great Intrusion: Democracy in Higher Education. Arkansas University Alumnus.Google Scholar
  21. Scott, P. 2010. The Expansion of Higher Education Is a Key Element in Our Democracy. The Guardian (UK), 15 March.Google Scholar
  22. Sewell, W. 1971. Inequality of Opportunity for Higher Education. American Sociological Review 36 (5): 793–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Slaughter, Sheila, and Larry L. Leslie. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Teixeira, P.N. 2000. A Portrait of the Economics of Education, 1960–1997. History of Political Economy 32 (suppl. 1): 257–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. The Business Today. 2014. Reasons for Low Employability of Engineering Graduates, 10 April.Google Scholar
  26. The Harvard Crimson. 2015. Higher Education for All. The Harvard Crimson, 27 January.
  27. The Hindu. 2013. Employability Skills Low Among B.Tech. Grads, 17 May.Google Scholar
  28. Tilak, J.B.G. 2004. Higher Education Between the State and the Market. Paper Presented at UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge, 1–3 December.Google Scholar
  29. Tilak, J.B.G. 2005. Higher Education: A Public Good or A Commodity for Trade? Keynote Address at the 2nd Nobel Laureates Meeting in Barcelona, 2 December. Barcelona: Global University Network for Innovation.Google Scholar
  30. Tilak, J.B.G. 2014. Private Higher Education in India. Economic and Political Weekly 4 (October): 32–38.Google Scholar
  31. UNESCO. 1998. World Statistical Outlook on Higher Education: 1980–1995. Working Document, World Conference on Higher Education 1998. Paris.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arup Maharatna
    • 1
  1. 1.Independent ScholarKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations