Advertisement

Taking a Co-benefits Approach in Asia: A Comparative Analysis of Barriers with Recommendations

Chapter

Abstract

Recognizing actions that can achieve co-benefits – mitigating climate change and meeting other development priorities – as an useful approach to climate mitigation and sustainable development while noting that there have been few studies to date to closely examine barriers in such actions, this chapter studied the barriers and the potential solutions available by comparing 28 case studies from 5 sectors in 10 Asian countries. Findings included that many significant challenges arise at the user level and modest change in behavior or technology can overcome these user-level constraints, that financial and economic barriers are significant in cases involving infrastructure and these financial barriers proved to be surmountable, that governance barriers were important but not all of them were equally important and wider scale institutional issues occurred in policies or attempts to scale up smaller scale actions, and that none of the barriers or possible solutions operates in isolation. Conclusions indicate the potential of international processes and stakeholder engagement to overcome barriers and the usefulness of the notion of social co-benefits.

Keywords

Co-benefits Comparative analysis Sustainable development 

References

  1. Aunan K, Fang J, Vennemo H, Oye K, Seip MH (2004) Co-benefits of climate policy-lessons learned from a study in Shanxi, China. Energy Policy 32:567–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bond TC, Doherty SJ, Fahey DW, Forster PM, Berntsen T, DeAngelo BJ, Flanner MG, Ghan S, Kärcher B, Koch D, Kinne S (2013) Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: a scientific assessment. J Geophys Res Atmos 118(11):5380–5552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. IPCC (2001) In: Metz B, Davidson O, Swart R, Pan J (eds) Third assessment report: climate change, 2001: mitigation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Mayrhofer JP, Gupta J (2016) The science and politics of co-benefits in climate policy. Environ Sci Pol 57:22–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Miyatsuka A, Zusman E (2010) Fact sheet no.1 what are co-benefits? Asian co-benefits partnership. Retrieved from http://pub.iges.or.jp/modules/envirolib/upload/3378/attach/acp_factsheet_1_what_co-benefits.pdf
  6. Morgenstern R (1991) Toward a comprehensive approach to global climate change mitigation. Am Econ Rev 81(2):140–145Google Scholar
  7. O’Conner D (2001) Estimating ancillary benefits of climate policy using economy-wide models: theory and application in developing countries. Paper presented at the EEPSEA Biennial Researchers’ Workshop, Hanoi, Vietnam, Nov 21–22, 2001Google Scholar
  8. Pearce D (2000) Policy frameworks for the ancillary benefits of climate change policies. CSERGE Working Paper GEC 2000-1. http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/gec. p 1
  9. Ürge-Vorsatz D, Tirado-Herrero S, Dubash N, Lecocq F (2014) Measuring the co-benefits of climate change mitigation. Annu Rev Environ Resour 39:549–582.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-031312-125456 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Global Environmental StrategiesHayamaJapan

Personalised recommendations