Advertisement

Interventional Imaging in Pediatric Abdominal Trauma

  • Shagufta Wahab
Chapter

Abstract

The most common form of treatment of abdominal injuries in children is conservative, and it depends on the child’s response to initial resuscitation. However, a small percentage of children with blunt abdominal trauma may be nonresponsive to blood and fluid resuscitation due to significant injury with continuous internal bleeding. Such a patient requires emergent surgical or interventional radiology intervention to prevent hemorrhagic shock. Surgical exploration of unknown bleeding point could become even lengthier if the injury requires repair. This is not desirable in the aforementioned clinical scenario. Here comes the role of angiography and selective transarterial embolization/stenting in “damage control” and salvaging the patient. Thus in the acute bleeding, interventional radiology may help to control the hemorrhage or reestablish blood flow by using stents. In elective setting, it can help percutaneous stenting and drainage of urinary and biliary systems. Interventional radiology can also come as a rescue in the management of delayed complications of trauma, e.g., fistulas or pseudoaneurysms [1, 2].

References

  1. 1.
    Kiankhooy A, Sartorelli KH, Vane DW, Bhave AD. Angiographic embolization is safe and effective therapy for blunt abdominal solid organ injury in children. J Trauma. 2010;68:526–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vo NJ, Althoen M, Hippe DS, Prabhu SJ, Valji K, Padia SA. Pediatric abdominal and pelvic trauma: safety and efficacy of arterial embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25:215–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wahlgren CM, Kragsterman B. Management and outcomes of pediatric vascular injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79:563–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rowland SP, Dharmarajah B, Moore HM, et al. Venous injuries in pediatric trauma: systematic review of injuries and management. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77:356–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee YH, Wu CH, Wang LJ, Wong YC, Chen HW, Wang CJ, et al. Predictive factors for early failure of transarterial embolization in blunt hepatic injury patients. Clin Radiol. 2014;69:e505–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gross JL, Woll NL, Hanson CA, et al. Embolization for pediatric blunt splenic injury in an alternative to splenectomy when observation fails. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75:421–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gaarder C, Dormagen JB, Eken T, Skaga NO, Klow NE, Pillgram-Larsen J, et al. Nonoperative management of splenic injuries: improved results with angioembolization. J Trauma. 2006;61:192–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boudghene F, L'Hennine C, Bigot J. Arterial complications of pancreatitis: diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in 104 cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1993;4:551–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mauro MA, Jaques P. Transcatheter management of pseudoaneurysms complicating pancreatitis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1991;2:527–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wessel LM, Scholz S, Jester I, Arnold R, Lorenz C, Hosie S, et al. Management of kidney injuries in children with blunt abdominal trauma. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35(9):1326–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Margenthaler JA, Weber TR, Keller MS. Blunt renal trauma in children: experience with conservative management at a pediatric trauma center. J Trauma. 2002;52:928–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shagufta Wahab
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiodiagnosisJawaharlal Nehru Medical College, AMUAligarhIndia

Personalised recommendations