Advertisement

Introduction

  • Dale Leorke
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter introduces the overarching concepts and argument of the book. It begins with a brief overview of location-based gaming and its historical context. I then outline the two key claims made about location-based games in the scholarly and mainstream discourses around them. These claims relate to their potential to engage their players with, or disconnect them from, the people and physical environment around them through the game.

References

  1. Chun, W. (2006). Control and Freedom: Power and Paranoia in the Age of Fiber Optics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Curtis, A. (2011). Episode One: ‘Love and Power’. All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace [BBC series].Google Scholar
  3. de Souza e Silva, A. (2006). From Cyber to Hybrid: Mobile Technologies as Interfaces of Hybrid Spaces. Space & Culture, 9(3), 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Souza e Silva, A., & Hjorth, L. (2009). Playful Urban Spaces: A Historical Approach to Mobile Games. Simulation & Gaming, 40(5), 602–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dyer-Witheford, N., & de Peuter, G. (2009). Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  6. Farman, J. (2012). Mobile Interface Theory: Embodied Space and Locative Media. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flanagan, M. (2009). Critical Play: Radical Game Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gazzard, A. (2011). Location, Location, Location: Collecting Space and Place in Mobile Media. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 17(4), 405–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Habuchi, I. (2005). Accelerating Reflexivity. In M. Ito, D. Okabe, & M. Matsuda (Eds.), Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life (pp. 165–182). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Jacobs, J. (2011/1958, September 18). Downtown is for the People. Fortune. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20180109011504/http://fortune.com/2011/09/18/downtown-is-for-people-fortune-classic-1958/
  11. Katz, J. E. (2006). Magic in the Air: Mobile Communication and the Transformation of Social Life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Kücklich, J. (2005). Precarious Playbour: Modders and the Digital Games Industry. Fibreculture Journal, 5. Retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/20170427211838/http://five.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-025-precarious-playbour-modders-and-the-digital-games-industry/
  13. Kücklich, J. (2009). Virtual Worlds and their Discontents: Precarious Sovereignty, Governmentality and the Ideology of Play. Games and Culture, 4(4), 340–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lantz, F. (2006). Big Games and the Porous Border Between the Real and the Mediated. Receiver, 16. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20070101235852/http://www.receiver.vodafone.com/16/articles/pdf/16_07.pdf
  15. Licoppe, C., & Inada, Y. (2006). Emergent Uses of a Multiplayer Location-Aware Mobile Game: The Interactional Consequences of Mediated Encounters. Mobilities, 1(1), 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Licoppe, C., & Inada, Y. (2010). Locative Media and Cultures of Mediated Proximity: The Case of the Mogi Game Location-aware Community. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 691–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ling, R. (2004). The Mobile Connection: The Cell Phone’s Impact on Society. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  18. Lütticken, S. (2010). Playtimes. New Left Review, 66(Nov.–Dec.), 125–140.Google Scholar
  19. McGonigal, J. (2006). This Might be a Game: Ubiquitous Play and Performance at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century. Dissertation submitted to the University of California. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20170309050415/http://www.avantgame.com/McGonigal_THIS_MIGHT_BE_A_GAME_sm.pdf
  20. Montola, M. (2012). On the Edge of the Magic Circle: Understanding Role-Playing and Pervasive Games. Dissertation submitted to the University of Tampere, Finland. Retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/20180212032439/http://tampub.uta.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/66937/978-951-44-8864-1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  21. Nagel, M. (2002). Masking the Abject: A Genealogy of Play. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  22. Simmel, G. (1950/1917). Sociability: An Example of Pure, or Formal, Sociology. In K.H. Wolff (Trans. and Ed.), The Sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 40–57). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Stenros, J., & Montola, M. (2009). Historical Influences on Pervasive Games. In S. Montola & A. Waern (Eds.), Pervasive Games: Theory and Design (pp. 53–70). Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wark, M. (2007). Gamer Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dale Leorke
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre of Excellence in Game Culture StudiesUniversity of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations