Advertisement

Bone Endoscopy

  • Dennis King Hang Yee
  • Tun Hing Lui
  • Tze Wang Chan
Chapter

Abstract

Subchondral cyst, intraosseous ganglion or synovial bone cyst had been used by various authors to describe benign bone cyst containing mucoid viscous materials at the metaphysis or epiphysis of long bones adjacent to a joint [1, 2]. The three terms appear to be used interchangeably [2, 3], although some authors prefer to classify lesion as an interosseous ganglion if it occurs as a solitary lesion not associated with degenerative joint diseases [4]. Synovial bone cyst is a misnomer as the cyst lining lacks synovial cell surface [5]. Most frequently it involved the hip, the ankle, the knee and the carpal bones [5].

References

  1. 1.
    Sakamoto A, Oda Y, Iwamoto Y. Intraosseous Ganglia: a series of 17 treated cases. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:462730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scholten PE, Altena MC, Krips R, van Dijk CN. Treatment of a large intraosseous talar ganglion by means of hindfoot endoscopy. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Uysal M, Akpinar S, Ozalay M, Ozkoc G, Cesur N, Hersekli MA, et al. Arthroscopic debridement and grafting of an intraosseous talar ganglion. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koulalis D, Schultz W. Massive intraosseous ganglion of the talus: reconstruction of the articular surface of the ankle joint. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:E14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schajowicz F, Clavel Sainz M, Slullitel JA. Juxta-articular bone cysts (intra-osseous ganglia): a clinicopathological study of eighty-eight cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1979;61:107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lui TH. Arthroscopic bone grafting of talar bone cyst using posterior ankle arthroscopy. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52:529–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Dijk CN, Reilingh ML, Zengerink M, van Bergen CJ. Osteochondral defects in the ankle: why painful? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:570–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anthony PP, Gie GA, Howie CR, Ling RS. Localised endosteal bone lysis in relation to the femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Durr HD, Martin H, Pellengahr C, Schlemmer M, Maier M, Jansson V. The cause of subchondral bone cysts in osteoarthrosis: a finite element analysis. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:554–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johansson L, Edlund U, Fahlgren A, Aspenberg P. Bone resorption induced by fluid flow. J Biomech Eng. 2009;131:094505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Dijk CN. Chapter 8: osteochondral lesions. In: Ankle arthroscopy. Heidelberg: Springer; 2014. p. 149–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van der Vis HM, Aspenberg P, Marti RK, Tigchelaar W, Van Noorden CJ. Fluid pressure causes bone resorption in a rabbit model of prosthetic loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;350:201–8.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lui TH. Endoscopic curettage and bone grafting of huge talar bone cyst with preservation of cartilaginous surfaces: surgical planning. Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;20:248–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Sarrosa EA. Arthroscopic treatment of post-traumatic cysts of the talus. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hakim DN, Pelly T, Kulendran M, Caris JA. Benign tumours of the bone: a review. J Bone Oncol. 2015;4:37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marco RA, Gitelis S, Brebach GT, Healey JH. Cartilage tumors: evaluation and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:292–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dietz JF, Kachar SM, Nagle DJ. Endoscopically assisted excision of digital enchondroma. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:678.e1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Katsarma E, Raveendran SS. Enchondroma of the distal phalanx--minimal access approach. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:1115–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bauer HC, Brosjo O, Kreicbergs A, Lindholm J. Low risk of recurrence of enchondroma and low-grade chondrosarcoma in extremities. 80 patients followed for 2–25 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995;66:283–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Montero LM, Ikuta Y, Ishida O, Fujimoto Y, Nakamasu M. Enchondroma in the hand retrospective study--recurrence cases. Hand Surg. 2002;7:7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sekiya I, Matsui N, Otsuka T, Kobayashi M, Tsuchiya D. The treatment of enchondromas in the hand by endoscopic curettage without bone grafting. J Hand Surg (Br). 1997;22:230–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lui TH. Endoscopic curettage and bone grafting of the enchondroma of the proximal phalanx of the great toe. Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;21:137–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lui TH. Arthroscopic curettage and bone grafting of bone cysts of the talar body. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;6:e7–e13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lui TH. Revision lapidus arthrodesis by bone endoscopy. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5:e699–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lui TH. Endoscopically and fluoroscopically assisted curettage and bone grafting of the navicular bone cyst. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5:e1221–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Childs SG. Stimulators of bone healing. Biologic and biomechanical. Orthop Nurs. 2003;22:421–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heckman JD, Sarasohn-Kahn J. The economics of treating tibia fractures. The cost of delayed unions. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1997;56:63–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Musculoskeletal injuries report: incidence, risk factors and prevention. Rosemont: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2000.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mollon B, da Silva V, Busse JW, Einhorn TA, Bhandari M. Electrical stimulation for long-bone fracture-healing: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(11):2322–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Griffin XL, Costa ML, Parsons N, Smith N. Electromagnetic field stimulation for treating delayed union or non-union of long bone fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;4:CD008471.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rutten S, van den Bekerom MP, Sierevelt IN, Nolte PA. Enhancement of bone-healing by low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: a systematic review. JBJS Rev. 2016;4(3).  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.O.00027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hernigou P, Poignard A, Beaujean F, Rouard H. Percutaneous autologous bone-marrow grafting for nonunions. Influence of the number and concentration of progenitor cells. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(7):1430–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Braly HL, O’Connor DP, Brinker MR. Percutaneous autologous bone marrow injection in the treatment of distal meta-diaphyseal tibial nonunions and delayed unions. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27(9):527–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim SJ, Shin SJ, Yang KH, Moon SH, Lee SC. Endoscopic bone graft for delayed union and nonunion. Yonsei Med J. 2000;41(1):107–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bauer TW, Muschler GF. Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Johnson LL. Endoscopic bone grafting on the delayed union of the humerus. In: Presented at the 13th annual seminar of arthroscopic surgery, Phoenix, Arizona; 1991.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lui TH. Endoscopic bone grafting for management of nonunion of the tuberosity avulsion fracture of the fifth metatarsal. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128(11):1305–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kim SJ, Yang KH, Moon SH, Lee SC. Endoscopic bone graft for delayed union and nonunion. Arthroscopy. 1999;15(3):324–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lui TH. Endoscopic excision of symptomatic nonunion of anterior calcaneal process. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;50(4):476–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lui TH. Arthroscopic revision arthrodesis for non-union of the naviculocuneiform joint: a case report. J Orthop Surg. 2015;23:267–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lui TH. Symptomatic first metatarsocuneiform nonunion revised by arthroscopic Lapidus arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51:656–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lui TH. Arthroscopic revision of nonunion of calcaneocuboid distraction arthrodesis. Foot. 2013;23:172–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis King Hang Yee
    • 1
  • Tun Hing Lui
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • Tze Wang Chan
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsQueen Mary HospitalHong Kong SARChina
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyNorth District HospitalHong KongChina
  3. 3.Department of OrthopaedicsSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhouChina
  4. 4.Institute of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology—Chinese Academy of ScienceShenzhenChina
  5. 5.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyChinese University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  6. 6.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyPamela Youde Nethersole Eastern HospitalHong Kong SARChina

Personalised recommendations