Advertisement

Serendipity

  • Jeffrey K. H. Chan
Chapter

Abstract

Despite the stultifying legacies of modernist planning, cities today nonetheless aspire to become convivial places characterized by some form of serendipity. However, neither the meanings of serendipity in the urban context is clear, nor is the prospect for designing serendipity straightforward. Moreover, existing discourse tends to narrowly typify urban serendipity as instrumental to the aims of the creative city. In this chapter, four new vectors are proposed to expand on the meanings of urban serendipity beyond the creative city stereotype. They are namely urban serendipity as an (i) emergent effect of large cities; (ii) as a threatened experience in the Smart City; (iii) as an encounter with ‘more-than-human’ agencies and other living systems in the city; and finally, (iv) as a moral encounter with others.

Keywords

Serendipity Smart city Anticipatory governance More-than-human agencies Surprise 

References

  1. Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Amin, A. (2012). Land of strangers. Malden: Polity.Google Scholar
  4. Amoore, L. (2009). Algorithmic war: Everyday geographies of the war on terror. Antipode, 41(1), 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brand, S. (1994). How buildings learn: What happens after they’re built. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, J. (2004). The hero with a thousand faces. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cunha, M. P. (2008). Serendipity. In S. R. Clegg & J. R. Bailey (Eds.), International encyclopedia of organization studies (pp. 1407–1408). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Dawney, L., Kirwan, S., & Brigstocke, J. (2016). Introduction: The promise of the commons. In S. Kirwan, L. Dawney, & J. Brigstocke (Eds.), Space, power and the commons: The struggle for alternative futures (pp. 1–27). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. de Rond, M. (2014). The structure of serendipity. Culture and Organization, 20(5), 342–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Florida, R. (2013, August 22). From sewing to analyzing: The historical shift in urban work. Citylab. Retrieved from https://www.citylab.com/life/2013/08/sewing-analyzing-historical-shift-urban-work/6442/.
  11. Foth, M. (2016, April 8). Why we should design smart cities for getting lost. The Conversation. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/why-we-should-design-smart-cities-for-getting-lost-56492.
  12. Glasmeier, A., & Christopherson, S. (2015). Thinking about smart cities. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gross, M. (2010). Ignorance and surprise: Science, society, and ecological design. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grossi, G., & Pianezzi, D. (2017). Smart cities: Utopia or neoliberal ideology? Cities, 69, 79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Groves, K., & Marlow, O. (2016). Spaces for innovation: The design and science of inspiring environments. Amsterdam: Frame Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Guston, D. H. (2014). Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’. Social Studies of Science, 44(2), 218–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harvey, D. (2010). The enigma of capitalism and the crises of capitalism. London: Profile Books. Google Scholar
  18. Hinchliffe, S., & Whatmore, S. (2006). Living cities: Towards a politics of conviviality. Science as Culture, 15(2), 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hollands, R. G. (2015). Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Houston, D., Hillier, J., MacCallum, D., Steele, W., & Byrne, J. (2017). Make kin, not cities! Multispecies entanglements and ‘becoming-world’ in planning theory. Planning Theory.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216688042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacobs, J. (1993). The death and life of great American cities. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
  22. Johansson, F. (2006). The Medici Effect: What elephants and epidemics can teach us about innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kitchin, R. (2015). Making sense of smart cities: Addressing present shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kitchin, R. (2016). The ethics of smart cities and urban science. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 374. http://dx.doi/org10.1098/rsta.2016.0115.
  25. Kitchin, R., Lauriault, T. P., & McArdle, G. (2016). Smart cities and the politics of urban data. In S. Marvin, A. Luque-Ayala, & C. McFarlane (Eds.), Smart urbanism: Utopian vision or false dawn? (pp. 16–33). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Lefebvre, H. (2003). The urban revolution. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  27. Leszczynski, A. (2016). Speculative futures: Cities, data, and governance beyond smart urbanism. Environment and Planning A, 48(9), 1691–1708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lim, H. S., & Lu, X. X. (2016). Sustainable urban stormwater management in the tropics: An evaluation of Singapore’s ABC Waters program. Journal of Hydrology, 538, 842–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lindsay, G. (2013, April 5). Engineering serendipity. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/07/opinion/sunday/engineering-serendipity.html.
  30. Lindsay, G. (2014, November 1). Engineering serendipity. Medium. Retrieved from https://medium.com/aspen-ideas/engineering-serendipity-941e601a9b65.
  31. Løgstrup, K. E. (1997). The ethical demand. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  32. Machiavelli, N. (2005). The prince. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  33. Meisterlin, L. (2014). Antipublic urbanism: Las Vegas and the Downtown Project. The Avery Review, No. 3. Retrieved from http://averyreview.com/issues/3/antipublic-urbanism.
  34. Merton, R. K. (2004). Afterword: Autobiographic reflections on the travels and adventures of serendipity. In R. K. Merton & E. Barber (Eds.), The travels and adventures of serendipity: A study in sociological semantics and the sociology of science (pp. 230–298). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Merton, R. K., & Barber, E. (2004). The travels and adventures of serendipity: A study in sociological semantics and the sociology of science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Metzger, J. (2016). Expanding the subject of planning: Enacting the relational complexities of more-than-human urban common(er)s. In S. Kirwan, L. Dawney, & J. Brigstocke (Eds.), Space, power and the commons: The struggle for alternative futures (pp. 133–149). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Mitchell, W. J. (1999). E-topia. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. Murdoch, I. (2014). The sovereignty of good. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Olma, S. (2016). In defence of serendipity: For a radical politics of innovation. London: Repeater Books.Google Scholar
  40. Picon, A. (2015). Smart cities: A spatialized intelligence. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reps, P. (2009). Writings from the Zen masters. Compiled by Paul Reps. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  42. Rudofsky, B. (1994). Architecture without architects: A short introduction to non-pedigreed architecture. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  43. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sennett, R. (1973). The uses of disorder: Personal identity and city life. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  45. Sennett, R. (2005). Capitalism and the city: Globalization, flexibility, and indifference. In Y. Kazepov (Ed.), Cities of Europe: Changing contexts, local arrangements, and the challenge to urban cohesion (pp. 109–122). Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sennett, R. (2012). Together: The rituals, pleasures and politics of cooperation. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  47. Sennett, R. (2017). Edges: Self and city. In M. Mostafavi (Ed.), Ethics of the urban: The city and the spaces of the political (pp. 261–268). Zurich: Lars Muller Publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Suzuki, D. T. (2002). Buddha of infinite light: The teachings of Shin Buddhism, the Japanese way of wisdom and compassion. Boston: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  49. Thatcher, J. (2013). Avoiding the Ghetto through hope and fear: An analysis of immanent technology using ideal types. GeoJournal, 78, 967–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wagner, J., & Watch, D. (2017). Innovation spaces: The new design of work. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  51. West, G. (2017). Scale: The universal laws of growth, innovation, sustainability, and the pace of life in organisms, cities, economies, and companies. London: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  52. Williams, B. (1999). Moral luck: Philosophical papers 1973–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Willis, C. (1995). Form follows finance: Skyscrapers and skylines in New York and Chicago. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  54. Yates, J. J. (2017). Saving the soul of the smart city. The Hedgehog Review, 19(2), 18–35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey K. H. Chan
    • 1
  1. 1.Singapore University of Technology and DesignSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations