Advertisement

Implementation of Congestion Charge Policy in China: Legal Analysis and Security Research

  • Han-ru Li
  • Yuejun Liu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 503)

Abstract

The non-exclusiveness to certain extent of transport resources particularly represented by urban road resources tends to result in a market failure and bring about an excessive travel of sedan cars. If the subsequent huge external cost of congestion, safety, pollution and other areas is not directly paid by car users but jointly borne by the entire society, this will distort rational allocation of social resources and further stimulate to a big extent the pursue of sedan cars and waste of resources. As an important measure of the demand management policy, the congestion charge policy can effectively regulate the cost to use sedan cars and help government administration authorities correct the distorted resource allocation mode and establish a more efficient and fairer transport system. The implementation of the congestion charge, which is a typical economic measure regulating the use of sedan cars, and the refinement of related supporting measures will demand explicit legal support.

Keywords

Congestion charge Legal barrier Legislative opinion and implementation security 

References

  1. 1.
    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. Reducing congestion and funding transportation using road pricing in Europe and SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gao F (2012) Feasibility study on traffic congestion charge project of Guangzhou City—a reference to the implementation process of Stockholm’s traffic congestion charge project. Mod Bus 19 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ming M, Yuan C, Guo X (2009) Impact assessment of implementation of congestion charge in central areas of metropolises. Technol Econ Areas of Commun 01Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Notice of the People’s Government of Beijing Municipality on Printing and Distributing the Beijing 2013–2017 Clean Air Action Plan (Jing Zheng Fa [2013] No. 27): http://zhengwu.beijing.gov.cn/gzdt/gggs/t1324560.htm
  5. 5.
    Notice of the General Office of the People’s Government of Beijing Municipality on Printing and Distributing the Beijing 2013–2017 Action Plan for Control over Motor Vehicle Pollutant Emissions (Jing Zheng Ban Fa [2013] No. 53): http://zhengwu.beijing.gov.cn/gzdt/gggs/t1329445.htm
  6. 6.
    Notice of the General Office of the State Council on Relevant Issues Regarding the Remediation of Noncompliant Charges from Motor Vehicles and Treatment of Road Sites (Guo Ban Fa [2002] No. 31): http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-10/12/content_5117804.htm
  7. 7.
    Development Policy for Automotive Industry, Order 8 of the National Development and Reform Commission of the People’s Republic of China: http://www.sdpc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbl/200506/t20050614_7501.html
  8. 8.
    Transport for London (2003) Central London congestion charging impacts monitoring first annual report. Transport for London, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Willoughby C (2001) Singapore’s motorization policies 1960–2000. Transp Policy 8(2):125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Highway Research Institute of Ministry of CommunicationsBeijingChina
  2. 2.Beijing Transport InstituteBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations