Advertisement

Satisfaction Evaluation Model of Intercity Bus Service with Different Educational Background Travelers: A Case Study in Guangzhou and Foshan

  • Weiwei Qi
  • Jiajun Mei
  • Huiying Wen
  • Yaping Wu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 503)

Abstract

Guangzhou and Foshan, the two cities belong to the core area of the Pearl River Delta, the border areas of two cities are about 200 km, so they are unique to natural conditions of the intercity traffic construction. This year, the traffic infrastructures between Guangzhou and Foshan are very fast. There are many ways to travel between the two cities, including the subway, city rail, city bus, and so on. The complex travel groups with different educational backgrounds between the two cities of Guangzhou and Foshan have concerned whether the intercity bus service is satisfactory, and the city manager and the public have also concerned about the topic. The satisfaction indexes of the intercity bus travel can give a good feedback to the intercity travel situation. So, the indexes of economic convenience, reliability, comfort, and accessibility are selected to build a comprehensive index system. Then, the satisfaction evaluation model of intercity bus service with different educational background travelers is established via the entropy weight method. The calculation results show as follows: There is a higher demand for travel time for the intercity travelers under the bachelor’s degree. The college degree travelers pay more attention to the reliability and comfort of the intercity travel. The master’s degree traveler’s demand for intercity travel is more comfortable and reliable, but the demand for accessibility is relatively low. The travel demand for doctoral degree travelers is close to the master, and the demand for economic convenience and comfort is relatively high. Finally, the research results can provide a practical thought train for the evaluation method of the intercity public transport service level, and also provide the reference goal for the accurate service of the intercity transportation facilities.

Keywords

Satisfaction evaluation model Intercity bus service Entropy weight method Educational background Guangzhou and Foshan 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2016A030310427), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2015ZM025), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71701070).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper. The content of questionnaire has been confirmed by the Ethics Committee of SCUT.

References

  1. 1.
    Alpu Ozlem (2015) A methodology for evaluating satisfaction with high-speed train services: a case study in Turkey. Transp Policy 44:151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Ona J, De Ona R, Calvo FJ (2012) A classification tree approach to identify key factors of transit service quality. Expert Syst Appl 39(12):11164–11171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grisé Emily, El-Geneidy Ahmed (2017) Evaluating the relationship between socially (dis)advantaged neighbourhoods and customer satisfaction of bus service in London, U.K. J Transp Geogr 58:166–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Friman M, Fellesson M (2009) Service supply and customer satisfaction in public transportation: the quality paradox. J Public Transp 12(4):57–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Oña J, de Oña R, Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2015) Heterogeneity in perceptions of service quality among groups of railway passengers. Int J Sustain Transp 9(8):612–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2015) Relationships between rail passengers’ satisfaction and service quality: a framework for identifying key service factors. Public Transp 7(2):185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wallis Ian P (2016) Demand and service impacts of competition for the market—Australian urban bus case studies. Res Transp Econ 59:330–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mulley Corinne, Ho Chinh (2013) Evaluating the impact of bus network planning changes in Sydney, Australia. Transp Policy 30:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sajjakaj J, Vatanavongs R (2016) Measurement modelling of the perceived service quality of a sightseeing bus service: an application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. Transp Policy 45:240–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cafiso S, Di Graziano A, Pappalardo G (2013) Using the Delphi method to evaluate opinions of public transport managers on bus safety. Saf Sci 57(8):254–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and TransportationSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations