Stabilization Analysis of Mixed Traffic Flow with Electric Vehicles Based on the Modified Multiple Velocity Difference Model

  • Chenggang Li
  • Hongwei Guo
  • Wuhong Wang
  • Xiaobei Jiang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 503)


Electric vehicles have gained popularity in modern society as a solution to both traffic pollution and energy consumption. However, the stabilization of the mixed traffic flow with both electric vehicles (EVs) and fuel electric vehicles (FVs) in the road network has been explored very little. In this study, a modified multiple velocity difference model is developed by taking into account the unique features of EVs. The stability criterion is obtained by the linear analysis, and the coexisting curves are drawn. In addition, the traffic behavior of the modified model is further investigated with numerical simulations. The results show that the characters of different type of vehicles have a great impact on the stability of the mixed traffic flow. Yet, EVs always show better performance in stabilizing the stream than FVs, which indicates that more EVs on the road would help make the traffic much more quickly back to the steady state.


Stabilization Electric vehicles Mixed traffic flow Modified multiple velocity difference model 



This research is partially supported by the Beijing Institute of Technology International Science and Technology Cooperation Project (GZ2016035102), and the Project Based Personnel Exchange Program with China Scholarship Council and German Academic Exchange Service.


  1. 1.
    Quddus MA (2008) Time series count data models: an empirical application to traffic accidents. Accid Anal Prev 40(5):1732–1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brijs T, Karlis D, Wets G (2008) Studying the effect of weather conditions on daily crash counts using a discrete time-series model. Accid Anal Prev 40(3):1180–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bando M, Hasebe K, Nakayama A, Shibta A, Sugiyama Y (1995) Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. Phys Rev E 51(2):1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Helbing D, Tilch B (1998) Generalized force model of traffic dynamics. Phys Rev E 58:133–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jiang R, Wu QS, Zhu ZJ (2001) Full velocity difference model for a car-following theory. Phys Rev E 64:017101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang T, Gao ZY, Zhao XM (2006) Multiple velocity difference model and its stability analysis. Acta Phys Sin 55:634–640Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xie DF, Gao ZY, Zhao XM (2008) Stabilization of traffic flow based on the multiple information of preceding cars. Commun Comput Phys 3(4):899–912MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosey F, Auberlet JM (2014) Driving simulator configuration impacts drivers’ behavior and control performance: An example with studies of a rural intersection. Transp Res Part F 27:99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Warner HW, Aberg L (2008) Drivers’ beliefs about exceeding the speed limits. Transp Res Part F 11(5):376–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gwyther H, Holland C (2014) Feelings of vulnerability and effects on driving behaviour—a qualitative study. Transp Res Part F 24:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Silva C, Ross M, Farias T (2009) Evaluation of energy consumption, emissions and cost of plug-in hybrid vehicles. Energ Convers Manage 50(7):1635–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Faria R, Maques P, Moura P (2013) Impact of the electricity mix and use profile in the life-cycle assessment of electric vehicles. Renew Sust Energ Rev 24(3):271–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hawkins TR, Singh B, Majeau BG (2013) Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. J Ind Ecol 17(1):53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang SC, Deng C, Tang TQ, Qian YS (2013) Electric vehicle’s energy consumption of car-following models. Nonlinear Dynam 71(1–2):323–329MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Darbha S, Rajagopal KR (1999) Intelligent cruise control systems and traffic flow stability. Transp Res Part C 7(6):329–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Castillo JM (2001) Propagation of perturbations in dense traffic flow: a model and its implications. Transp Res Part B 35(4):367–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yi JG, Lin H, Alvarez L, Horowitz R (2003) Stability of macroscopic traffic flow modeling through wavefront expansion. Transp Res Part B 37(7):661–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meng JP, Dai SQ, Dong LY, Zhang JF (2007) Cellular automaton model for mixed traffic flow with motorcycles. Phys A 380(7):470–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wan LW, Chiou YC, Lin ZS, Hsu CC (2010) Cellular automaton simulations for mixed traffic with erratic motorcycles’ behaviors. Phys A 389(10):2077–2089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hu XJ, Wang W, Yang HF (2012) Mixed traffic flow model considering illegal lane-changing behavior: simulations in the framework of Kerner’s three-phase theory. Phys A 391(21):5102–5111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moussa N, Daoudia AK (2003) Numerical study of two classes of cellular automaton models for traffic flow on a two-lane roadway. Eur Phys J B 31(3):413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang P, Wong SC, Shu CW (2006) A weighted essentially non-oscillatory numerical scheme for a multi-class traffic flow model on an inhomogeneous highway. J Comput Phys 212(2):739–756MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li, XG, Jia B, Gao ZY, Jiang R (2006) A realistic two-lane cellular automata traffic model considering aggressive lane-changing behavior of fast vehicle. Physica A 367(C):479–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mu R, Yamamoto T (2012) An analysis on mixed traffic flow of conventional passenger cars and microcars using a cellular automata model. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 43(4):457–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chowdhury D, Wolf DE, Schreckenberg M (1997) Particle hopping models for two-lane traffic with two kinds of vehicles: effects of lane-changing rules. Phys A 235(3–4):417–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu LY, Li XG, Jia B (2014) Traffic dynamics around weaving section with mixed slow and fast vehicles based on cellular automata model. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 138:548–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aghabayk K, Sarvi M, Young W, Wang Y (2012) Investigating heavy-vehicle interactions during car-following process. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mason AD, Woods AW (1997) Car-following model of multispecies systems of road traffic. Phys Rev E 55(3):2203–2214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jin S, Wang DH, Huang ZY, Tao PF (2011) Visual angle model for car-following theory. Phys A 390(11):1931–1940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yang D, Jin P, Pu Y, Ran B (2014) Stability analysis of the mixed traffic flow of cars and trucks using heterogeneous optimal velocity car-following model. Phys A 395(4):371–383MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Transportation EngineeringBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations