Advertisement

Progressive Localism and the Moral Economy: Lessons from the London Living Wage

  • Corinne Nativel
Chapter
Part of the ARI - Springer Asia Series book series (ARI, volume 6)

Abstract

Local living wage campaigns and ordinances have become key political tools to tackle rising inequalities and in-work poverty in the cities of the West. Community organizers, trade unions and enlightened municipalities have fought for the adoption of living wage agreements and have, as shown with the case of London presented in this chapter, even strongly managed to influence national politics. Living wage policies are therefore generally regarded as a meaningful illustration of “progressive localism”. Their diffusion holds the promise of stronger social inclusion and redistributive justice, which are among the key pillars of the progressive city. However, the complexity and heterogeneity of the living wage movement in the British capital underline the importance of temporal and multi-scalar dynamics as well as entrenched class and racial inequalities. In the long run, political co-option and hijacking by the “establishment” mean that local living wage politics, as any other form of progressive localism, risk losing their progressive edge. “Progressive localism” undoubtedly contributes to a theory of the progressive city, but this concept needs to be understood as a radical alternative against neoliberalism and urban austerity, and not as a new avatar of local innovation.

References

  1. Aldridge, H., Bushe, S., Kenway, P., MacInnes, T., & Tinson, A. (2013). London’s poverty profile 2013. London: Trust for London & New Policy Institute http://www.npi.org.uk/files/3313/8150/0123/Final_full_report.pdf.Google Scholar
  2. Balazard, H. (2015). Agir en démocratie [Acting within democracy]. Paris: Editions de l’Atelier.Google Scholar
  3. Beaumont, J., & Nicholls, W. (2008). Plural governance, participation and democracy in cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 87–94.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00779.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Churchill, W. (1909). United Kingdom Legislative Council Trade boards bill (eds), Hansard Series 5(4.): cc388, http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1909/apr/28/trade-boards-bill. 28 April 1909.
  5. Clavel, P. (1986). The progressive city: Planning and participation, 1969–1984. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Coats, D., Johnson, N., & Hackett, P. (2012). From the poor law to welfare-to-work: What have we learnt from a century of anti-poverty policies? London: The Smith Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Dorling, D. (2010). Injustice: Why social inequality persists. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Douglass, M. (2018). The rise of progressive cities for human and planetary flourishing - a global perspective on Asia’s urban transition, Chapter 2. In M. Douglass, K. C. Ho, & R. Garbaye (Eds.), The rise of progressive cities east and west. Springer.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy. (2011). Cities of tomorrow, challenges, vision, ways forward. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  10. Featherstone, D., Ince, A., MacKinnon, D., Strauss, K., & Cumbers, A. (2012). Progressive localism and the construction of political alternatives. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(2), 177–182.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00493.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibney, J. (2011). Knowledge in a “shared and interdependent world”: Implications for a progressive leadership of cities and regions. European Planning Studies, 19(4), 613–627.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.548474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldberg, M. (2014). The rise of the progressive city. The Nation, April 21.Google Scholar
  13. Greater London Authority. (2013). 2020 Vision, the greatest city on earth: Ambitions for London by Boris Johnson. London: GLA.Google Scholar
  14. Hamnett, C. (2003). Unequal city: London in the global arena. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Jacobs, K., & Manzi, T. (2013). New localism, old retrenchment: The ‘big society’, housing policy and the politics of welfare reform. Housing Theory and Society, 30(1), 29–45  https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2012.683293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones, E. (2015). The establishment and how they get away with it. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  17. Jouve, B. (2005). La démocratie en métropoles: gouvernance, participation et citoyenneté. Revue Française de Science Politique, 55, 317–337.  https://doi.org/10.3917/rfsp.552.0317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, N., Sissons, P., & Jones, K. (2013). Wage inequality and employment polarisation in British cities. The work foundation: Lancaster.Google Scholar
  19. Living Wage Commission. (2014, June). Work that pays, final report of the living wage commission. www.livingwagecommission.org.uk.
  20. London Assembly, Economy Committee. (2014). Fair pay, making the London living wage the norm. London: Greater London Authority.Google Scholar
  21. Lowndes, V., & Pratchett, L. (2012). Local governance under the coalition government: Austerity, localism and the ‘big society’. Local Government Studies, 38(1), 21–40.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2011.642949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Gonzalez, S., & Swyngedouw, E. (2007). Introduction: Social innovation and governance in European cities: Urban development between path dependency and radical innovation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(3), 195–209.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776407077737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pantland, W. (2015, April 27). Cleaners protest at Barbican Centre for living wage. Union Solidarity International. https://usilive.org/cleaners-protest-at-barbican-centre-for-london-living-wage/. Accessed 31 Aug 2016.
  24. Peck, J. (2012). Austerity urbanism, American cities under extreme economy. City, 16(6), 626–655.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2012.734071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schragger, R. C. (2009). The progressive city. Virginia public law and legal theory research paper No. 2009-16. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1471430.
  26. Schragger, R. C. (2013). Is a progressive city possible? Reviving urban liberalism for the twenty-first century, Virginia public law and legal theory research paper no. 2013–2022. Harvard Law & Policy Review, 7, 901 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2295697.Google Scholar
  27. Swarts, H., & Vasi, B. (2011). Which US cities adopt living ordinances? Predictors of adoption of a new labor tactic, 1994–2006. Urban Affairs Review, 47(6), 743–774.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087411412733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Twycross, F. (2014, March). London cost of living report. A living wage. London: Greater London Authority/London Assembly Labour.Google Scholar
  30. Velut, J.-B. (2018). The promises and pitfalls of US labour ordinances, Chapter 9. In M. Douglass, K. C. Ho, & R. Garbaye (Eds.), The rise of progressive cities east and west. Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Wills, J. (2008). Making class politics possible: Organising contract cleaners in London. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(2), 305–324.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00783.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wills, J., & Linneker, B. (2012, October). The costs and benefits of the London Living Wage. Report commissioned by Trust for London, London: School of Geography, Queen Mary University of London.Google Scholar
  33. Wills, J., & Linneker, B. (2014). In-work poverty and the living wage campaign in the United Kingdom: A geographical perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 39(2), 182–194.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilson, T., Gardiner, L., & Krasnowski, K. (2013). Work in progress- low pay and progression in London and in the UK. London: Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion http://www.learningandwork.org.uk/sites/niace_en/files/resources/Work_in_progress_full.pdf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Corinne Nativel
    • 1
  1. 1.Université de Paris Est-Créteil (UPEC)CréteilFrance

Personalised recommendations