The Asian Tsunami and Post-Disaster Aid: Critical Perspectives

  • Sunita ReddyEmail author


The Asian Tsunami of 2004 drew worldwide attention due to the sheer scale of destruction: massive loss of lives, livelihoods, and infrastructure. It attracted unprecedented international attention, assistance, and aid. While there has been a lot written on the Asian tsunami, mostly by natural scientists, engineers, disaster management, and policy specialists, yet a sustained body of scholarly work in the social sciences on long-term Rehabilitation has not been developed. The existing perspectives from different disciplines are understandably influenced by the enormous loss of property and material devastation and the efforts to manage and mitigate disasters.


  1. Alexander, D.E. 1999. Natural Disasters. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Athukorala, P.C. 2012. Indian Ocean Tsunami: Disaster, Generosity and Recovery. Asian Economic Journal 26 (3): 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binder, M. 2009. Humanitarian Crises and the International Politics of Selectivity. Human Rights Review 10 (3): 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birkmann, J., P. Buckle, J. Jaeger, et al. 2010. Extreme Events and Disasters: A Window of Opportunity For Change? Analysis of Organizational, Institutional and Political Changes, Formal and Informal Responses After Mega-Disasters. Natural Hazards 55 (3): 637–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bosher, L., and A. Dainty. 2011. Disaster Risk Reduction and ‘Built-In’ Resilience: Towards Overarching Principles for Construction Practice. Disasters 35 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coyne, C. 2013. Doing Bad by Doing Good: Why Humanitarian Action Fails. United States: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Global Humanitarian Overview. 2015. Status report. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. UNOCHA, 23. Available: Retrieved on 12 May 2016.
  8. Gunewardena, N., and Mark Schuller. 2008. Capitalizing on Catastrophe: Neoliberal Strategies in Disaster Reconstruction. New York: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hilhorst, D., and B.J. Jansen. 2010. Humanitarian Space as Arena: Perspective on the Everyday Politics of Aid. Journal Development and Change 41 (6): 1117–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Howden, M. 2009. How Humanitarian Logistics Information System can improve Humanitarian Supply Chains: A View from the Field. In Proceeding of the 6th International ISCRAM Conference—Gothenburg, Sweden, May 2009. Available: Accessed on 12 May 2016.
  11. Hyndman, J. 2011. Dual Disasters: Humanitarian Aid After the 2004 Tsunami. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  12. Inderfurth, K.F., D. Fabrycky, S.P. Cohen. 2005. The Tsunami Report Card. Foreign Policy: 57–68. Available: Accessed on 12 May 2016.
  13. Jha, A.K., Duyne, J.E. 2010. Safer Homes, Stronger Communities: A Handbook for Reconstructing After Natural Disasters. World Bank Publications, Available: Accessed on 12 May 2016.
  14. Kennedy, J., J. Ashmore, E. Babister, and I. Kelman. 2008. The meaning of ‘build back better’: evidence from post‐tsunami Aceh and Sri Lanka. Journal of contingencies and crisis management, 16(1), 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Klein, N. 2007. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Kweifio-Okai, C. 2014. Where Did the Indian Ocean Tsunami Aid Money Go? The Guardian. Available: Accessed on 12 May 2016.
  17. Lund, R., and P. Blaikie. 2013. The Tsunami of 2004 in Sri Lanka: Impacts and Policy in the Shadow of Civil War. UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Minear, L., T.G. Weiss. 1995. Humanitarian Politics, Headline Series No. 304. Foreign Policy Association, 17, Available: Accessed on 12 May 2016.
  19. Nakagawa, Y., R. Shaw. 2004. Social Capital: A Missing Link to Disaster Recovery. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 22 (1): 5–34.Google Scholar
  20. Oliver-Smith, A. 1990. Post-Disaster Housing Reconstruction and Social Inequality: A Challenge to Policy and Practice. Disasters 14 (1): 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oliver-Smith, A. 2002. Theorizing Disasters: Nature, Power, and Culture. In Catastrophe & Culture: The Anthropology of Disaster, ed. S.M. Hoffman and A. Oliver-Smith, 23–47. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  22. Podger, O. 2013. Adapting Professional Practices for Post-Disaster Reconstruction. Project Management World Journal 2 (4): 1.Google Scholar
  23. Reddy, S. 2012. Clash of Waves: Post Tsunami Relief and Rehabilitation in Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Delhi: Indos Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Riddell, R. 2007. Does Foreign Aid Really Work?. UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Schneider, S.K. 1992. Governmental Response to Disasters: The Conflict Between Bureaucratic Procedures and Emergent Norms. Public Administration Review 52 (2): 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schullar, M. 2008. Deconstructing the Disaster after the Disaster: Constructing Disaster Capitalism. In Capitalizing on Catastrophe: Neoliberal Strategies in Disaster Reconstruction, ed. N. Gunewardena and M. Schuller, 17–28. New York: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  27. Shaw, R., M. Gupta, and A. Sarma. 2003. Community Recovery and Its Sustainability: Lessons from Gujarat Earthquake of India. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 18 (2): 28.Google Scholar
  28. Silva, K.T. 2009. ‘Tsunami Third Wave’ and the Politics of Disaster Management in Sri Lanka. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography 63 (1): 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Singh, S.J. 2009. Complex Disasters: The Nicobar Islands in the Grip of Humanitarian Aid. Geographische Rundschau International Edition 5 (3): 48–56.Google Scholar
  30. Strömberg, D. 2007. Natural Disasters, Economic Development, and Humanitarian Aid. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (3): 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Telford, J., and J. Cosgrave. 2007. The International Humanitarian System and the 2004 Indian Ocean Earthquake and Tsunamis. Disasters 31 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Telford, J., J. Cosgrave, R. Houghton. 2006. Joint Evaluation of the International Response to the Indian Ocean Tsunami: Synthesis Report. Tsunami Evaluation Coalition. Available: Accessed on 16 Mar 2017.
  33. Thomas, M. 2017. Understanding Humanitarian Funds: Growing Beyond Country Based Pooled Funds. Norwegian Refugee Council, Norwegian, Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Available: Accessed on 16 Mar 2017.
  34. UN/ISDR. 2007. Disaster Risk Reduction: 2007 Global Review. Consultation Edition, United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. Available: Accessed on 16 Mar 2017.
  35. Warner, Daniel. 1999. The politics of the political/humanitarian divide. International Review of the Red Cross 81 (833): 109–118. International Committee of the Red Cross.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wisner, B., P. Blaikie, T. Cannon, et al. 2004. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. World Economic Forum. 2017. The Future of Humanitarian Response. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting. Available: Accessed 16 Mar 2017.
  38. Zanotti, L. 2010. Cacophonies of aid, failed state building and NGOs in Haiti: setting the stage for disaster, envisioning the future. Third World Quarterly 31 (5): 755–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre of Social Medicine and Community Health and Adjunct Faculty at the Special Centre for Disaster ResearchJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations