Linking Academic Research and Policymaking

  • Budiati PrasetiamartatiEmail author
  • Fred Carden
  • Siti Ruhanawati
  • Inaya Rakhmani
  • Yanuar Nugroho


This chapter explores the challenges that Indonesian academics face in producing policy-relevant research and using research evidence to inform policymaking. National- and university-level policies and practices discourage academics from undertaking research. These disincentives include a lack of funding for research, an overly strong emphasis on teaching and undervaluing of research and a less financially rewarding and unclear career path for researchers. Teaching and research in Indonesian universities tend to promote specialised, rather than broad-based, knowledge. This limits universities’ ability to bring interdisciplinary perspectives to bear on the complex social and economic problems faced by Indonesia. There is a marked divide between the political world of policymaking and the intellectual world of research: policymakers’ needs and priorities are not well communicated, and academic researchers seldom see policymakers or the public as key audiences for their research. The authors of this chapter reflect on these challenges and provide insights into how the development of a strong, interdisciplinary research culture in universities can support policymakers to develop appropriate policy responses to the issues confronting Indonesia today and in the future.


University research Academic research Knowledge sector Research funding Human resources Research culture Policymaking 


  1. AIPI [Akademi Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia/Indonesian Academy of Sciences]. (2017). Era Disrupsi: Peluang dan Tantangan Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia (Disruption era: Opportunities and challenges of Indonesian higher education). Jakarta: Indonesian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  2. Brodjonegoro, S. S., & Greene, M. P. (2012). Creating an Indonesian science fund. Jakarta: AIPI and World Bank. Accessed 14 June 2017.
  3. Colbeck, C. (1998). Merging in a seamless blend: How faculty integrate teaching and research. Journal of Higher Education, 69, 647–671.Google Scholar
  4. DRPM [Direktorat Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat/Directorate of Research and Community Services]. (2016). Panduan Pelaksanaan Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat di Perguruan Tinggi (Guidelines for implementation of research and Community Services in Universities). Jakarta: Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education.Google Scholar
  5. DRPM [Direktorat Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat/Directorate of Research and Community Services]. (2017). Rekap Penelitian Tahun 2013–2017 (Research recapitulation 2013–2017). Jakarta: Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education.Google Scholar
  6. Foray, D. (2004). Economics of knowledge. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ford, M. (2012). Mechanisms for building research capacity in Indonesia’s knowledge sector through Australian universities. Jakarta: AusAid. Accessed 5 June 2017.
  8. Griffiths, R. (2004). Knowledge production and the research–teaching nexus: The case of the built environment disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 709–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guggenheim, S. (2012). Indonesia’s quiet springtime: Knowledge, policy and reform. In A. Reid (Ed.), Indonesia rising: The repositioning of Asia’s third giant (pp. 141–169). Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar
  10. Hadiz, V. R., & Dhakidae, D. (2005). Social science and power in Indonesia. Singapore: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Horta, H., Dautel, V., & Veloso, F. (2012). An output perspective on the teaching–research nexus: An analysis focusing on the United States higher education system. Studies in Higher Education, 37(2), 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Karetji, P. C. (2010). Overview of the Indonesian knowledge sector. Jakarta: AusAID. Available at: Accessed 5 June 2017.
  13. Kompas. (2016, September 15). Dana Riset Jadi 0,2 Persen PDB, tetapi Cuma Karena Perubahan Rumus Penghitungan (Research funds became 0.2 percent of GDP, but only due to changes in the calculation formulas).Google Scholar
  14. Moeliodihardjo, B. Y., Biemo, W., Brodjonegoro, S. S., & Hatakenaka, S. (2012). University, industry, and government partnership: Its present and future challenges in Indonesia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 52, 307–316. Scholar
  15. Mok, K. (2008). Varieties of regulatory regimes in Asia: The liberalization of the higher education market and changing governance in Hong, Kong, Singapore, and Malaysia. Pacific Review, 21(2), 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Neumann, R. (1994). The teaching–research nexus: Applying a framework to university students’ learning experiences. European Journal of Education, 29, 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nizam, N. (2006). Higher education in South East Asia-Indonesia. Accessed 5 June 2017.
  18. Nugroho, Y., Prasetiamartati, B., & Ruhanawati, S. (2016). Addressing barriers to university research (Working Paper 8). Jakarta: Knowledge Sector Initiative. Accessed 5 June 2017.
  19. OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]. (2013). OECD reviews of innovation policy: Innovation in Southeast Asia.
  20. OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]. (2016). PISA 2015 results in focus. Paris. Accessed 5 June 2017.
  21. Pappiptek LIPI [Pusat Penelitian Perkembangan IPTEK Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia]. (2014). Buku Saku Indikator IPTEK Indonesia 2014 (Pocket book of science and technology indicators Indonesia). Jakarta: Pappiptek LIPI.Google Scholar
  22. PDDIKTI [Pangkalan Data Pendidikan Tinggi]. (2017). Jumlah Dosen Aktif Berdasarkan Jenjang Pendidikan Tertinggi (Number of active academic staff based on highest education level). Accessed 2 May 2017.
  23. Pellini, A., Helen, T., & Carden, F. (2016, November 16). Indonesia’s knowledge sector is catching up, but a large gap persists. The Conversation. Accessed 5 June 2017.
  24. Rakhmani, I., & Siregar, F. (2016). Reforming research in Indonesia: Policies and practices (Working Paper No 72). Washington, DC: Global Development Network.Google Scholar
  25. Rakhmani, I. (2016, February 3). Insularity leaves Indonesia trailing behind in the world of social research. Retrieved from The Conversation: Accessed 18 Apr 2018.
  26. Rakhmani, I., Siregar, F., & Halim, M. (2017). Policy journal diagnostic. Jakarta: Knowledge Sector Initiative. Accessed 5 June 2017.
  27. Robertson, J. (2007). Beyond the ‘research/teaching nexus’: Exploring the complexity of academic experience. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 541–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rosser, A. (2016). Neo-liberalism and the politics of higher education policy in Indonesia. Comparative Education, 52(2), 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sabarini, P. (2016, March 31). Indonesia launches its first multi-year funding scheme for scientific research. The Conversation. Accessed 5 June 2017.
  30. Simons, M., & Elen, J. (2007). The ‘research-teaching nexus’ and ‘education through research’: An exploration of ambivalences. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 617–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stern, L. N. (2016). Building on success and learning from experience: An independent review of the research excellence framework. London: Government of the United Kingdom. Accessed 5 June 2017.
  32. Suradijono, S. H., Probandari, A., Syafrudin, D., Panggabean, H., & Kurniawan, T. (2017). Addressing barriers to research in university: Cases from four Indonesian universities. KSI Diagnostic Study. Jakarta: Knowledge Sector Initiative. Accessed 14 June 2017.
  33. Suryadarma, D., & Jones, G. W. (Eds.). (2013). Education in Indonesia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  34. Syafrudin, D., Nasuhi, H., Darmadi, D., Makruf, J., Umam, S., & Ropi, I. (2017). Addressing barriers to research in university: A case study of State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah (Kajian Diagnostik Mengatasi Hambatan Penelitian di Universitas: Studi Kasus UIN Syarif Hidayatullah). Jakarta: Knowledge Sector Initiative and Centre for Study of Islam and Society (PPIM) UIN. Accessed 14 June 2017.
  35. Tilley, H., & Hidayat, D. (2017). The knowledge sector in Indonesia: higher education and R&D expenditure. Infographic. Jakarta: Knowledge Sector Initiative. Accessed 5 June 2017.
  36. Tyfield, D. (2012). A cultural political economy of research and innovation in an age of crisis. Minerva, 50(2), 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. UNESCO [United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization] Institute of Statistics. Dataset: Science, technology and innovation. Accessed 20 Jan 2017.
  38. Wicaksono, T. Y., & Friawan, D. (2011). Recent developments in higher education in Indonesia: Issues and challenges. In S. Armstrong & B. Chapman (Eds.), Financing higher education and economic development in East Asia (pp. 159–187). Canberra: Australian National University E-Press. Accessed 25 Jan 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Budiati Prasetiamartati
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fred Carden
    • 2
  • Siti Ruhanawati
    • 1
  • Inaya Rakhmani
    • 3
  • Yanuar Nugroho
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Australia-Indonesia Partnership for Pro-Poor Policy: The Knowledge Sector InitiativeJakartaIndonesia
  2. 2.Using Evidence Inc.OttawaCanada
  3. 3.Department of Communication, Faculty of Social and Political SciencesUniversity of IndonesiaJakartaIndonesia
  4. 4.Analysis and Oversight of Strategic Issues on Social, Cultural, and Ecological AffairsJakartaIndonesia
  5. 5.Executive Office of the PresidentGovernment of IndonesiaJakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations