• Arnaldo PelliniEmail author
  • Budiati Prasetiamartati
  • Kharisma Priyo Nugroho
  • Elisabeth Jackson
  • Fred Carden


Indonesia’s strong economic growth over the last decade has enabled it to regain its status as a lower-middle-income country following the Asian financial crisis of 1997–1998. To continue on this path of growth, prosperity and democratisation, Indonesia’s policymakers need to develop effective public policies that increase productivity and competitiveness and ensure that the benefits of growth translate into better public services and increased economic opportunities for all. How well equipped is Indonesia to face these challenges? Is the country developing the intellectual capital required to transform knowledge into growth? How do policymakers make use of evidence to inform policy decisions? This book examines these and other key questions through the lens of the Indonesian ‘knowledge sector’ – the overall institutional landscape of government, private sector and civil society organisations that produce, synthesise and use knowledge to support the development of public policies – as Indonesia transitions to a knowledge-based economy. The authors draw their insights and evidence from experience acquired during implementation of the Australia-Indonesia Partnership for Pro-Poor Policy: the Knowledge Sector Initiative, a donor-funded programme that aims to strengthen demand for and use of evidence in policymaking in Indonesia.


Evidence-informed policymaking Knowledge sector Indonesia Policymaking Evidence-based policymaking Demand and use of evidence Policy cycle 


  1. AusAID [Government of Australia. Australian Agency for International Development]. (2012). Australia-Indonesia Partnership for Pro-Poor Policy: The knowledge sector initiative: Design document. Jakarta. Accessed 11 Mar 2014.
  2. Cairney, P. (2016). The politics of evidence-based policy making. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carden, F. (2009). Knowledge to policy: Making the most of development research. London: Sage and IDRC.Google Scholar
  4. Carden, F. (2017). How do you evaluate a mental revolution? (Working Paper 22). Jakarta: Knowledge Sector Initiative. Accessed 20 May 2017.
  5. Datta, A., Jones, H., Febriany, V., Harris, D., Dewi, R. K., Wild, L., & Young, J. (2011). The political economy of policy-making in Indonesia. AusAID. Available at: Accessed 20 May 2017.
  6. Davies, H. T. O., Nutley, S., & Smith, P. (2000). Introducing evidence-based policy and practice in public services, In H. T. O. Davies, S. M. Nutley, & P. C. Smith (Ed.), What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  7. Davies, P. (2012). The state of evidence-based policy evaluation and its role in policy formation. National Institute Economic Review, 219(1), 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flynn, N. (1999). Modernizing British government. Parliamentary Affairs, 52(4), 582–597. Scholar
  9. Government of the United Kingdom, Cabinet Office. (1999). Modernising government (White Paper). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  10. Indonesia Investments. (2016, February 6). GDP in focus: Analysis of Indonesia’s 5.04% economic growth in Q4-2015. Accessed 18 March 2017.
  11. Karetji, P. C. (2010). Overview of the Indonesian knowledge sector. Jakarta: AusAID. Available at: Accessed on 21 May 2017.
  12. Leicester, G. (1999). The seven enemies of evidence-based policy. Public Money and Management, 19(1), 5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lindblom, C. E. (1968). The policy-making process. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ, 312(1996), 71. Scholar
  15. Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  16. Shaxson, L. (2016). Lessons for building and managing an evidence base for policy (Working Paper 10). Jakarta: Knowledge Sector Initiative. Accessed 5 April 2017.
  17. Sherlock, S. (2010). Knowledge for policy: Regulatory obstacles to the growth of a knowledge market in Indonesia. Jakarta: AusAID. Accessed 9 June 2017.
  18. Stuart, E., Samman, E., Avis, W., Berliner, T. (2015). The data revolution. Finding the missing millions. London: Overseas Development Institute. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.
  19. Sumarto, S. (2011). The SMERU research institute: History and lessons learned. Jakarta: AusAID. Available at: Accessed 22 May 2017.
  20. Suryadarma, D., Pomeroy, J., Tanuwidjaja, S. (2010). Economic factors underpinning constraints in Indonesia’s knowledge sector. Jakarta: AusAID. Accessed 23 May 2017.
  21. Sutcliffe, S., & Court, J. (2005). Evidence-based policymaking: What is it? How does it work? What relevance for developing countries? London: Overseas Development Institute. Accessed 15 Mar 2017.
  22. Weiss, C. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39(5), 426–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnaldo Pellini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Budiati Prasetiamartati
    • 2
  • Kharisma Priyo Nugroho
    • 3
    • 4
  • Elisabeth Jackson
    • 2
  • Fred Carden
    • 5
  1. 1.Overseas Development InstituteLondonUK
  2. 2.Australia-Indonesia Partnership for Pro-Poor Policy: The Knowledge Sector InitiativeJakartaIndonesia
  3. 3.Indonesian Alliance for Policy Research (ARK Indonesia)JakartaIndonesia
  4. 4.Winrock InternationalBangkokThailand
  5. 5.Using Evidence Inc.OttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations