Life Cycle Assessment of LFP Cathode Material Production for Power Lithium-Ion Batteries

  • Jun Xie
  • Feng Gao
  • Xianzheng Gong
  • Zhihong Wang
  • Yu Liu
  • Boxue Sun
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)

Abstract

To cope with the world energy crisis and global climate change, the governments of the world attach great importance to the development of new energy industry. The production and application of power lithium-ion battery also attract much attention. Based on the life cycle model we built for the lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cathode materials production, the resources and energy consumption inventory of LFP cathode production was calculated. The environmental impacts of LFP production for a power lithium-ion battery were analyzed. The results showed that the synthesis process of LFP production was the key production stage and accounted for 52.93% of the accumulated environmental burden, followed by Li2CO3 preparation, (NH2)2HPO4 preparation and Fe3O4 preparation, which accounted for 20.90, 18.90 and 7.27% of overall environmental burdens respectively. The key impact categories of LFP production were human toxicity, fossil depletion, climate change and acidification, which accounted for 77.62, 6.36, 5.21 and 4.19% of total environmental impact, respectively. The climate change potential of LFP production in different stages was compared emphatically. The Li2CO3 preparation was the key stage for the climate change potential, which accounted for 50.59% of greenhouse gases emissions. The optimized synthesis process could be conducive to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions and decrease the environmental burden caused by the production of lithium iron phosphate.

Keywords

Power lithium-ion battery Cathode material Lithium iron phosphate Life cycle assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFF0201501, 2017YFF0211501), Beijing municipal science & technology commission project (D161100002416001), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Project No. 51304009).

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    C. Wang, B. Chen, Y.J. Yu, Carbon footprint analysis of lithium ion secondary battery industry: two case studies from China. J. J. Clean. Prod. 13, 1–11 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y.J. Yu, X. Wang, Environmental characteristics comparison of Li-ion batteries and Ni-MH batteries under the uncertainty of cycle performance. J. J. Hazard. Mater. 230, 455–460 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y.H. Liang, J. Su, Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for greenhouse gas emissions. J. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 31, 340–349 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Majeau, T.R. Hawkins, Life cycle environmental assessment of lithium-ion and nickel metal hydride batteries for plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 10, 4548–4554 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Anna, Environmental impacts of a transition toward e-mobility: the present and future role of lithium carbonate production. J. J. Clean. Prod. 23, 104–112 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D.A. Notter, M. Gauch, Contribution of Li-ion batteries to the environmental impact of electric vehicles. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 6550–6556 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.L. Sullivan, L. Gaines, Status of life cycle inventories for batteries. J. Energy Convers. Manage. 58, 134–148 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Matheys, W. Autenboer, Influence of functional unit on the life cycle assessment of traction batteries. J. Life Cycle Assess. 12, 191–196 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Matheys, J.M. Timmermans, Comparison of the environmental impact of five electric vehicle battery technologies using LCA. J. Int. J. Sustain. Manuf. 3, 318–329 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Spanos, D.E. Turney, Life-cycle analysis of flow-assisted nickel zinc-, manganese dioxide-, and valve-regulated lead-acid batteries designed for demand-charge reduction. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 43, 478–494 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.B. Dunn, L. Gaines, J.C. Kelly, The significance of Li-ion batteries in electric vehicle life-cycle energy and emissions and recycling’s role in its reduction. J. Energy. Environ. Sci. 8, 158–168 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Kushnir, Multi-level energy analysis of emerging technologies: a case study in new materials for lithium ion batteries. J. Clean. Prod. 19, 1405–1416 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. Reuter, Assessment of sustainability issues for the selection of materials and technologies during product design: a case study of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles. J. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 10, 217–227 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. Duncan, The time dimension and lithium resource constraints for electric vehicles. J. Resour. Policy 37, 93–103 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O. Luis, M. Maarten, Key issues of lithium-ion batteries from resource depletion to environmental performance indicators. J. J. Clean. Prod. 108, 54–362 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Swart, Resource demand for the production of different cathode materials for lithium ion batteries. J. J. Clean. Prod. 9, 2–5 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.Y. Hu, F. Gao, Z.H. Wang, Life Cycle Assessment of Steel Production. J. Materials Science Forum. 787, 102–105 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    F.F. Zhang, Life cycle assessment of ammonium phosphate production, Master’s thesis, Shandong University, 2016Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    The first national census data compilation committee. In Manual of Pollution Discharge Coefficient of the Pollution Source Census (Beijing, 2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    B.X. Sun, Z.R. Nie, Y. Liu, X.Z. Gong, F. Gao, Z.H. Wang, Research on life cycle CO2 emissions of energy carriers in China. J. Mater. Res. Innovations 18, 56–61 (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    X.H. Di, Z.R. Nie, B.R. Yuan, T.Y. Zuo, Life cycle inventory for electricity generation in China. J. Life Cycle Assess. 12, 217–224 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. Shiau, C. Samaras, Impact of battery weight and charging patterns on the economic and environmental benefits of plug-in hybrid vehicles. J. Energy Policy 37, 2653–2663 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    F. Peters, M. Baumann, The environmental impact of Li-ion batteries and the role of key parameters—a review. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 67, 491–506 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jun Xie
    • 1
  • Feng Gao
    • 1
  • Xianzheng Gong
    • 1
  • Zhihong Wang
    • 1
  • Yu Liu
    • 1
  • Boxue Sun
    • 1
  1. 1.Center of National Materials Life Cycle Assessment, College of Materials Science and EngineeringBeijing University of TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations