Advertisement

A Two-Fold Empirical Approach for Estimating the Preconsolidation Stress in Clay Deposits

  • Karim Kootahi
  • Paul W. Mayne
Conference paper

Abstract

The conventional method for determining preconsolidation stress of clay is via one-dimensional consolidation tests on undisturbed samples but a first-order approximate value can be estimated from simple empirical models that relate preconsolidation stress to easily measured soil properties, such as natural water content, liquid limit, plasticity index, etc. In this paper, a two-fold simple empirical model for predicting preconsolidation stress that bifurcates at an overconsolidation ratio (OCR) of 3 is developed. Two independent data sets which consist of about 2000 samples of fine-grained soils are used as model-building and model-validation data sets. The results of applying the new and existing simple empirical models to validation data set indicate that (1) the proposed model provides quite acceptable estimates for soils with different stress histories and sensitivities, (2) the predictive ability of the new model is quite superior to existing models, and (3) the performance of prior existing models can be classified as unacceptable.

Keywords

Preconsolidation stress Index properties Empirical models 

References

  1. Casagrande, A.: The determination of preconsolidation load and its practical significance, Discussion D-34. In: 1st International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, pp. 60–64. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1936)Google Scholar
  2. Ching, J., Phoon, K.K.: Modeling parameters of structured clays as a multivariate normal distribution. Can. Geotech. J. 49(5), 522–545 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DeGroot, D.J., Knudsen, S., Lunne, T.: Correlations among p′c, su, and index properties for offshore clays. In: Singh, S. K., Lacasse, S. (eds.) International Conference on Offshore and Nearshore Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 173–178. Balkema, Rotterdam (1999)Google Scholar
  4. Kootahi, K., Mayne, P.W.: Index test method for estimating the effective preconsolidation stress in clay deposits. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142(10) (2016)Google Scholar
  5. Kootahi, K., Mayne, P.W.: Closure to “Index test method for estimating the effective preconsolidation stress in clay deposits” by Karim Kootahi and Paul W. Mayne. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143(10) (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nagaraj, T.S., Murthy, B.R.S.: Prediction of compressibility of overconsolidated uncemented soils. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 112(4), 484–488 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Stas, C.V., Kulhawy, F.H.: Critical evaluation of design methods for foundations under axial uplift and compression loading. Report No. EL-3771, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California (1984)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Saghez BranchIslamic Azad UniversitySaghezIran
  2. 2.Geosystems Engineering Group, School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations