Engaging Learners in a Flipped Information Science Course with Gamification: A Quasi-experimental Study

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 843)

Abstract

In educational context, gamification is increasingly used as a pedagogical tool to increase learner engagement and motivation. However, there is still a lack of evidence about the long-term benefits of using gamified interventions in flipped classroom. This study examined the effects of a gamified intervention on student engagement in a 10-week flipped information science course. Prior to the intervention, the authors systematically reviewed the motivation theories that are relevant to game psychology, and proposed a goal-access-feedback-competition-collaboration (GAFCC) design model to scaffold the invention design. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected and analyzed to evaluate the impact of gamification. Results showed that the gamified group completed more out-of-class discussion activities than the control group within the expected time. Self-report data (i.e. survey data) indicated that more than half of the respondents in the gamified group expressed that gamification added fun to this course, and encouraged them to reflect on their learning strategies. This study provided evidence that gamification strategies guided by the GAFCC model can enhance students’ behavior engagement and motivation in the flipped activities. The implications and limitations of this study, and future trends are discussed as well.

Keywords

Gamification Flipped classroom Information science education Student engagement 

References

  1. Albert, M., Beatty, B.J.: Flipping the classroom applications to curriculum redesign for an introduction to management course: impact on grades. J. Educ. Bus. 89(8), 419–424 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antin, J., Churchill, E.F.: Badges in social media: a social psychological perspective. In: CHI 2011 Gamification Workshop Proceedings, pp. 1–4. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  3. Bergmann, J., Sams, A.: Remixing chemistry class: two Colorado teachers make vodcasts of their lectures to free up class time for hands-on activities. Learn. Lead. Technol. 36(4), 22–27 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. Betihavas, V., Bridgman, H., Kornhaber, R., Cross, M.: The evidence for ‘flipping out’: a systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse Educ. Today 38, 15–21 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bunchball, I.: Gamification 101: an introduction to the use of game dynamics to influence behavior. White paper, 9 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. Çakıroğlu, Ü., Başıbüyük, B., Güler, M., Atabay, M., Memiş, B.Y.: Gamifying an ICT course: influences on engagement and academic performance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 69, 98–107 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Intrinsic rewards and emergent motivation. In: The Hidden Costs of Reward: New Perspectives on the Psychology of Human Motivation, pp. 205–216 (1978)Google Scholar
  8. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Self-Determination. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., Nacke, L.: From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, pp. 9–15. ACM, September 2011Google Scholar
  10. Dicheva, D., Dichev, C.: An active learning model employing flipped learning and gamification strategies. In: Proceedings of First International Workshop on Intelligent Mentoring Systems, pp. 1–6 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., Angelova, G.: Gamification in education: a systematic mapping study. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 18(3), 75 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. Festinger, L.: A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 7(2), 117–140 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Han, H.C.: Gamified pedagogy: from gaming theory to creating a self-motivated learning environment in studio art. Stud. Art Educ. 56(3), 257–267 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. He, W., Holton, A., Farkas, G., Warschauer, M.: The effects of flipped instruction on out-of-class study time, exam performance, and student perceptions. Learn. Instr. 45, 61–71 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hew, K.F., Huang, B., Chu, K.W.S., Chiu, D.K.: Engaging Asian students through game mechanics: findings from two experiment studies. Comput. Educ. 92, 221–236 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang, B., Hew, K.F.: Do points, badges and leaderboard increase learning and activity: a quasi-experiment on the effects of gamification. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computers in Education, pp. 275–280, November 2015Google Scholar
  17. Landers, R.N., Bauer, K.N., Callan, R.C.: Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: a goal setting experiment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 71, 508–515 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lo, C.K., Hew, K.F., Chen, G.: Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: a synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educ. Res. Rev. 22, 50–73 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P.: Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. Am. Psychol. 57(9), 705–717 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mortensen, C.J., Nicholson, A.M.: The flipped classroom stimulates greater learning and is a modern 21st century approach to teaching today’s undergraduates. J. Anim. Sci. 93(7), 3722–3731 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nacke, L.E., Deterding, S.: The maturing of gamification research. Comput. Hum. Behav. 71, 450–454 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nederveld, A., Berge, Z.L.: Flipped learning in the workplace. J. Workplace Learn. 27(2), 162–172 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ng, K.: Bio (2014). https://keizng.wordpress.com/
  24. O’Flaherty, J., Phillips, C.: The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: a scoping review. Internet High. Educ. 25, 85–95 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sailer, M., Hense, J.U., Mayr, S.K., Mandl, H.: How gamification motivates: an experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 69, 371–380 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Skinner, B.F.: Science and Human Behavior. Simon and Schuster, New York (1953)Google Scholar
  27. Tune, J.D., Sturek, M., Basile, D.P.: Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 37(4), 316–320 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Werbach, K., Hunter, D.: For the Win: How Game Thinking Can Revolutionize Your Business. Wharton Digital Press, Philadelphia (2012)Google Scholar
  29. Yildirim, I.: The effects of gamification-based teaching practices on student achievement and students’ attitudes toward lessons. Internet High. Educ. 33, 86–92 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationThe University of Hong KongPok Fu Lam RoadHong Kong

Personalised recommendations