Investigating the Effectiveness of Vocabulary Learning Tasks from the Perspective of the Technique Feature Analysis: The Effects of Pictorial Annotations

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 843)

Abstract

This research examines the effectiveness of vocabulary learning tasks from the perspective of Nation and Webb’s (2011) technique feature analysis. Three frequently practiced word learning exercises (reading comprehension, cloze-exercises, and sentence writing), and two types of annotations for target words (pictorial annotations, and textual annotations) were investigated. One hundred and twenty undergraduate students participated in the study and were randomly assigned to four groups to complete four tasks: reading comprehension with pictorial annotations, cloze-exercises with textual annotations, cloze-exercises with pictorial annotations, and sentence-writing with textual annotations. The post-test scores showed that the tasks of reading comprehension with pictorial annotations and doing cloze-exercises with textual annotations were similarly effective; and cloze-exercises with pictorial annotations were similarly effective as sentence-writing with textual annotations. Such results are consistent with the checklist for technique feature analysis, indicating that this framework is reliable in evaluating and predicting task effectiveness. It also shows that the involvement of imaging in an activity is conducive to word learning, and pictorial annotations promote effective learning. More integration of pictorial annotations in language learning materials is therefore suggested.

Keywords

Vocabulary acquisition Technique feature analysis Pictorial annotations Imaging 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This study was fully supported by the Start-Up Research Grant (RG 54/2017-2018R) of The Education University of Hong Kong and a grant from Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (UGC/FDS11/E03/16).

References

  1. Abraham, L.: Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: a meta-analysis. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 12(3), 199–226 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Seghayer, K.: The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: a comparative study. Lang. Learn. Technol. 5(1), 202–232 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. Baddeley, A.D.: Human Memory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London (1990)Google Scholar
  4. Bagnole, J.W.: The magic and mystery of motivation in TEFL and language learning. TESOL Matters, February/March, 10–16 (1993)Google Scholar
  5. Boers, F., Warren, P., He, L., Deconinck, J.: Does adding pictures to glosses enhance vocabulary uptake from reading? System 66, 113–129 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. Chun, D.: CALL technologies for L2 reading. In: Ducate, L., Arnold, N. (eds.) Calling on CALL: From Theory and Research to New Directions in Foreign Language Teaching, pp. 69–98. CALICO, San Marcos (2006)Google Scholar
  7. Chun, D.M., Plass, J.L.: Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. Modern Lang. J. 80(2), 183–198 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dornyei, Z.: Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom? Modern Lang. J. 78, 273–284 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gardner, R.C.: Motivation and second language acquisition. Porta Linguarum 8, 9–20 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. Gohar, M.J., Rahmanian, M., Soleimani, H.: Technique feature analysis or involvement load hypothesis: estimating their predictive power in vocabulary learning. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 1–11 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9568-5
  11. Hu, H.C.M., Nassaji, H.: Effective vocabulary learning tasks: involvement load hypothesis versus technique feature analysis. System 56, 28–39 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacobs, G.M., Dufon, P., Fong, C.H.: L1 and L2 vocabulary glosses in L2 reading passages: their effectiveness for increasing comprehension and vocabulary knowledge. J. Res. Read. 17(1), 19–28 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Joe, A.: What effects do text–based tasks promoting generation have on incidental vocabulary acquisition? Appl. Linguist. 19, 357–377 (1998)Google Scholar
  14. Keating, G.: Task effectiveness and word learning in a second language: the involvement load hypothesis on trial. Lang. Teach. Res. 12(3), 365–386 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim, Y.: The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Lang. Learn. 58(2), 285–325 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ko, M.: Glosses, comprehension, and strategy use. Read. Foreign Lang. 17(2), 125–143 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. Mohsen, M.A., Balakumar, M.: A review of multimedia glosses and their effects on L2 vocabulary acquisition in CALL literature. ReCALL 23(02), 135–159 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nation, I.S.P.: Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nation, P., Webb, A.: Researching and Analyzing Vocabulary. Cengage Learning, Heinle (2011)Google Scholar
  20. Paribakht, T.S., Wesche, M.: Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. In: Coady, J., Huckin, T. (eds.) Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale for Pedagogy, pp. 174–200. Cambridge University Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  21. Plass, J.L., Chun, D.M., Mayer, R.E., Leutner, D.: Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. J. Educ. Psychol. 90, 25–36 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schmidt, R.: The role of consciousness in second language learning. Appl. Linguist. 11, 129–158 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schmidt, R.: Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In: Chan, W.M., Chi, S., Cin, K.N., Istanto, J., Nagami, M., Sew, J.W., Suthiwan, T., Walker, I. (eds.) Proceedings of CLaSIC 2010, pp. 721–737. Centre for Language Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore (2010)Google Scholar
  24. Underwood, J.: HyperCard and interactive video. CALICO 6(3), 7–20 (1989)Google Scholar
  25. Yanguas, I.: Multimedia glosses and their effect on L2 text comprehension and vocabulary learning. Lang. Learn. Technol. 13(2), 48–76 (2009)Google Scholar
  26. Yeh, Y., Wang, C.-W.: Effects of multimedia vocabulary annotations and learning styles on vocabulary learning. CALICO J. 21, 131–144 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yoshii, M.: L1 and L2 glosses: their effects on incidental vocabulary learning. Lang. Learn. Technol. 10(3), 85–101 (2006)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. Yoshii, M., Flaitz, J.: Second language incidental vocabulary retention: the effect of picture and annotation types. CALICO J. 20, 33–58 (2002)Google Scholar
  29. Xie, H.R., Zou, D., Lau, Y.K., Wang, F.L., Wong, T.L.: Generating incidental word-learning tasks via topic-based and load-based profiles. IEEE Multimedia 23(1), 60–70 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xie, H.R., Zou, D., Wang, F.L., Wong, T.-L.: A review on recent development of the involvement load hypothesis. In: Cheung, S.K.S., Kwok, L.-F., Ma, W.W.K., Lee, L.-K., Yang, H. (eds.) ICBL 2017. LNCS, vol. 10309, pp. 447–452. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59360-9_39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zou, D.: A study of the components of the involvement load hypothesis: how involvement load should be allocated to “Search” and “Evaluation”. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong (2012)Google Scholar
  32. Zou, D.: Comparing dictionary-induced vocabulary learning and inferencing in the context of reading. Lexikos 26, 372–390 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zou, D.: Vocabulary acquisition through cloze exercises, sentence-writing and composition-writing: extending the evaluation component of the involvement load hypothesis. Lang. Teach. Res. 21(1), 54–75 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zou, D., Wang, F.L., Xie, H.R., Wong, T.L., Kwan, R.: A flexible graph-based model for facilitating digital learning activities. Int. J. Innov. Learn. (2017a, forthcoming)Google Scholar
  35. Zou, D., Xie, H.R., Wang, F.L.: The use of monolingual mobile dictionaries in the context of reading by intermediate Cantonese EFL learners in Hong Kong. In: Helm, F., Bradley, L., Guarda, M., Thouesny, S. (eds.) Critical CALL, pp. 569–574. Researchpublishing.net (2015)Google Scholar
  36. Zou, D., Xie, H.R., Wang, F.L., Wong, T.L.: Modeling second language learners for learning task recommendation. Int. J. Innov. Learn. (2017b, forthcoming)Google Scholar
  37. Zou, D., Xie, H., Wong, T.-L., Wang, F.L., Kwan, R., Chan, W.H.: An Explicit Learner Profiling Model for Personalized Word Learning Recommendation. In: Huang, T.-C., Lau, R., Huang, Y.-M., Spaniol, M., Yuen, C.-H. (eds.) SETE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10676, pp. 495–499. Springer, Cham (2017c).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71084-6_58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Education University of Hong KongTai PoHong Kong SAR, China
  2. 2.Caritas Institute of Higher EducationTseung Kwan OHong Kong SAR, China
  3. 3.The Open University of Hong KongHo Man TinHong Kong SAR, China

Personalised recommendations