Advertisement

Could Postural Strategies Be Assessed with the Microsoft Kinect v2?

  • Diego Gonzalez
  • Luis Imbiriba
  • Frederico Jandre
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 68/2)

Abstract

Quantification of body movement strategies to maintain balance may be useful to understand changes in postural control. Some methods for this purpose require special preparations, such as placement of inertial sensors, goniometers or EMG electrodes. In this study, the capability of the Microsoft Kinect v2, a markerless motion sensor, to assess postural control strategies was tested. Forty-six young healthy subjects had the trajectories of 25 “joints”, provided by a Kinect v2, recorded during upright stance with eyes open or close, on rigid (force platform) and soft (foam pad) surfaces. Postural strategies were characterized by a strategy index (SI) based on the phase difference between the accelerations of upper (trunk) and lower (hip) segments of the body, measured by the Kinect in anterior-posterior and medial-lateral direction. Ankle and hip strategies were identified by in-phase or counterphase accelerations respectively, the phase being estimated from the covariance between 2-s sliding windows of the two signals. The trajectories of center of mass (COM) and center of pressure (COP) were also computed from the Kinect and the force plate, respectively. The SI and the velocities of COP and COM were significantly different between conditions (Friedman p < 0.001 for SI), suggesting effects of sensory information. These results are in line with other studies, showing coexistence of both strategies during stance and the predominance of ankle rather than hip strategy on foam or with closed eyes instead of on rigid surface with open eyes. These results support using the Kinect v2 to assess postural strategies.

Keywords

Body sway Microsoft Kinect v2 Postural strategy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank financial support of the agencies CNPq, CAPES and FAPERJ.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Visser, J.E., Carpenter, M.G., van der Kooij, H., Bloem, B.R.: The clinical utility of posturography. Clin. Neurophysiol. 119, 2424–2436 (2008).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Raymakers, J.A., Samson, M.M., Verhaar, H.J.J.: The assessment of body sway and the choice of the stability parameter(s). Gait Posture. 21, 48–58 (2005).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kuo, A.D., Speers, R.A., Peterka, R.J., Horak, F.B.: Effect of altered sensory conditions on multivariate descriptors of human postural sway. Exp. Brain Res. 122, 185–195 (1998).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Horak, F.B., Nashner, L.M., Diener, H.C.: Postural strategies associated with somatosensory and vestibular loss. Exp. Brain Res. 82, 167–177 (1990).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Creath, R., Kiemel, T., Horak, F., Peterka, R., Jeka, J.: A unified view of quiet and perturbed stance: simultaneous co-existing excitable modes. Neurosci. Lett. 377, 75–80 (2005).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baston, C., Mancini, M., Schoneburg, B., Horak, F., Rocchi, L.: Postural strategies assessed with inertial sensors in healthy and parkinsonian subjects. Gait Posture. 40, 70–75 (2014).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Runge, C.F., Shupert, C.L., Horak, F.B., Zajac, F.E.: Ankle and hip postural strategies defined by joint torques. Gait Posture. 10, 161–170 (1999).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fransson, P.A., Gomez, S., Patel, M., Johansson, L.: Changes in multi-segmented body movements and EMG activity while standing on firm and foam support surfaces. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 101, 81–89 (2007).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eltoukhy, M., Kuenze, C., Oh, J., Signorile, J.: Validation of Static and Dynamic Balance Assessment using Microsoft Kinect for Young and Elderly Populations. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. PP, 1–1 (2017).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Otte, K., Kayser, B., Mansow-Model, S., Verrel, J., Paul, F., Brandt, A.U., Schmitz-Hübsch, T.: Accuracy and Reliability of the Kinect Version 2 for Clinical Measurement of Motor Function. PloS One. 11, e0166532 (2016).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yeung, L.F., Cheng, K.C., Fong, C.H., Lee, W.C.C., Tong, K.-Y.: Evaluation of the Microsoft Kinect as a clinical assessment tool of body sway. Gait Posture. 40, 532–538 (2014).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Winter, D.A.: Biomechanics and Motor Control of Movement. John Wiley & Sons, Upper Saddle River (2004).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Winter, D.A., Patla, A.E., Prince, F., Ishac, M., Gielo-Perczak, K.: Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. J. Neurophysiol. 80, 1211–1221 (1998).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diego Gonzalez
    • 1
  • Luis Imbiriba
    • 2
  • Frederico Jandre
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering ProgramFederal University of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.School of Physical Education and SportsFederal University of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations