Advertisement

Digital Platforms for Restructuring the Public Sector

  • Antti Hautamäki
  • Kaisa Oksanen
Chapter
Part of the Translational Systems Sciences book series (TSS, volume 11)

Abstract

Many technological innovations have led to the emergence of the platform economy in recent years. This development is changing the entire landscape of business in the era of digitalisation. However, the impacts of the platform economy on public services and government are not well known. In this article we study the potential for the digital platform economy to help restructure the public sector. Firstly, central features of the new platform technology are explored, pointing to an algorithmic revolution, big data and cloud computing. Platforms are used in coordinating market transactions in an extremely efficient way. In order to apply the platform concept to the public sector, an experimental approach is needed; public platforms cannot be built by transposing mechanical models of the private sector to the public sector, because the market logic of public services is quite different than open markets. To illustrate the challenges and possibilities of the platform economy, we explored a few cases from Finland such as “Suomi.fi” digital service platform and its background technology, which is based on a national architecture for digital services developed in Finland applying X-Road technology created originally in Estonia. As a special case, we studied the Finnish solution to the digital health-care system. The case of “Kanta Services” exemplifies the challenge to simultaneously develop open and secure data systems for health care. Finally, we point out the importance of citizen-centred approaches in developing platforms for the public sector.

Keywords

Platform economy Public services Restructuring the public sector Artificial intelligence Mydata 

References

  1. Annala, M., Kaskinen, T., Lee, S., Leppänen, J., Mattila, K., Neuvonen, A., Nuutinen, J., Saarikoski, E., & Tarvainen, A. (2015). Design for government: Human-centric governance through experiments. Publication as a part the Government’s Analysis, Assessment and Research Activities 7/2015, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  2. Behavioural Insights Team. (2017). Website accessed 14 Mar 2017. http://www.behaviouralinsights.co.uk/
  3. Bell, E., & Owen, T. (2017). The platform press: How Silicon Valley reengineered journalism. New York: Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia Journalism School.Google Scholar
  4. Breckon, J. (2015). Better Public Services through experimental government. Alliance, Nesta [online] available from http://www.alliance4usefulevidence.org/assets/Final.pdf. Accessed 23 Mar 2017.
  5. Brown, T. (2009). Change by design. How design thinking transforms organisations and inspires innovation. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Chesbrough, H. (2011). Open services innovation, rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Daglio, M., Gerson, D., & Kitchen, H. (2014, November 12–13). Building organisational capacity for public sector innovation. Background paper prepared for the OECD Conference “Innovating the Public Sector: From Ideas to Impact”, Paris.Google Scholar
  8. Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92–201.Google Scholar
  9. Experimental Finland. (2017). Website accessed 23 Feb 2017. http://kokeilevasuomi.fi/en
  10. Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gore, E. M. (2014). Nonprofits should lead the sharing economy. Standford Social Innovation Review. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/nonprofits_should_lead_the_sharing_economy. Accessed 28 Apr 2017.
  12. Hautamäki, A. (2017). Terveyden omaehtoinen edistäminen – kehityspolku [Self-care – The development path]. Tekesin katsauksia 326/2017.Google Scholar
  13. Hautamäki, A., & Oksanen, K. (2015). Systemic development of service innovation. In R. Agarwal, W. Selen, G. Roos, & R. Green (Eds.), The handbook of service innovation (pp. 349–371). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ikävalko, P. (2017, May 6). Omat terveystiedot näkee Omakannasta [Own health data is seen from Omakanta]. Helsingin Sanomat Newspaper.Google Scholar
  15. Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology 32(3), Spring, 61–69.Google Scholar
  16. Kushida, K. E., Murray, J., & Zysman, J. (2014). Cloud computing: From scarcity to abundance. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-014-0188-y.
  17. Lourenço, J. S., Ciriolo, E., Almeida, R. S., & Troussard, X. (2016). Behavioural insights applied to policy: European Report 2016. EUR 27726 EN.Google Scholar
  18. OECD. (2015). The innovation imperative in the public sector: Setting an agenda for action. Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264236561-en
  19. OECD. (2017, February 12–14). Embracing innovation in government. Global trends. Dubai: World Government Summit in collaboration with the OECD. http://www.oecd.org/innovation/innovative-government/embracing-innovation-in-government-global-trends.htm
  20. Owen, T. (2015). Disruptive power, the crisis of the state in the digital age. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pentland, A. (2014). Social physics, how good ideas spread – The lessons from a new science. New York: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  22. PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2007, January). The road ahead for public service delivery: Delivering on the customer promise. Luxembourg: The Public Sector Research Centre, PwC.Google Scholar
  23. Sandararajan, A. (2013). From Zipcar to the sharing economy. Harvard Business Review. http://oz.stern.nyu.edu/SharingEconomy2013HBR.pdf. Accessed 28 Apr 2017.
  24. Smedlund, A. (2016). Digital health platform complementor motives and effectual reasoning. In 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 1614–1623.Google Scholar
  25. The Innovation Policy Platform (IPP). (2017). IPP platform by the OECD and the World Bank. https://www.innovationpolicyplatform.org/content/public-sector-innovation
  26. Tiwana, A. (2014). Platform ecosystems: Aligning architecture, governance, and strategy. Waltham: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  27. Vazquez Sampere, J. P. (2016, April 8). Why platform disruption is so much bigger than product disruption. The Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2016/04/why-platform-disruption-is-so-much-bigger-than-product-disruption
  28. Viskari, J. (2017, March 20). Sähköiset palvelut on sovitettava yhteen, [Electrical services have to fit together]. Helsingin Sanomat Newspaper.Google Scholar
  29. Zysman, J. (2006). The 4th service transformation: The algorithmic revolution. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery: Special Issue on Services Sciences, 49(7):48.Google Scholar
  30. Zysman, J. (2014). Escape from the commodity trap: Will the production transformation sustain productivity, growth and jobs? A manuscipt. Berkeley: Brie.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antti Hautamäki
    • 1
  • Kaisa Oksanen
    • 2
  1. 1.University of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland
  2. 2.Prime Minister’s OfficeHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations