Rethinking the Curriculum: Learning and Teaching Romans Then and Now

  • Orlando Nang Kwok Ho


The previous chapters have a slant towards the historicity of the text of The Epistle. The aim is to reclaim how a deep pedagogic reading of it can be rewarding. This chapter takes a slightly different angle. The discussion here, while anchors in The Epistle, will integrate critical perspectives and deliberative concerns about contemporary education. It aims to empower readers to come closer to some central beliefs and practices, especially if they are teachers or researchers. The focus here is to rethink and to philosophise critically about pedagogic perspectives, practices, and curricular issues. The authorial purpose here is neither to proselytise nor to preach. Instead, the central purpose is to pose genuine philosophical questions and to reassess the rationality and the defensibility of teaching about ideational and intellectual schemas that differ from the assumptions of the prevailing Secular Model of Education. That is, educators and schools do have legitimate philosophical grounds to refashion educational curriculums for reasoned pedagogic outcomes that truly reflect and embrace the developmental needs of learners as genuinely spirited individuals.


  1. Adler, A. (1999). The practice and theory of individual psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, D. (2001a). Why do we believe what we do believe? Where do our beliefs about science and faith come from? InRebuilding the matrix: Science and faith in the 21st century (pp. 12–31). Oxford: Lion Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, D. (2001b). Reweaving the rainbow: Scientific knowledge and religious knowledge. In M. Eggert & L. Hölscher (Eds.), Rebuilding the matrix: Science and faith in the 21st century (pp. 220–288). Oxford: Lion Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Apple, M. (1988). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education . New York/London: Routledge. Google Scholar
  5. Barnes, D. (1982). Practical curriculum study. London/Boston/Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  6. Barry, J., Jr. (1996). Theoretical embodiment: The technical authority of Newtonian time and space. InMeasures of science: Theological and technological impulses in early modern thought (pp. 157–174). Evanston: Northwest University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bernstein, R. (1983). The recovery of the hermeneutical dimension of science. In Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis (pp. 30–34). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  8. Biesta, G. (2008). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose of education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(2), 33–46.Google Scholar
  9. Brooke, J. (1996). Science and theology in the Enlightenment. In W. Richardson, & W. Wildman (Eds.), Religion & science: History, method, dialogue (pp. 2–28). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Crawford, R. (2000). The God vs Man’ World triangle: A dialogue between science and religion. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  11. Crumley II, J. (2009). Structure and sources of justification: Coherence theory. In An introduction to epistemology (pp. 133–158). Peterborough: Broadview Press, c2009.Google Scholar
  12. Dahlin, B. (2001). The primacy of cognition – Or of perception? A phenomenological critique of the theoretical bases of science education. In F. Bevilacqua et al. (Eds.), (pp. 129–151). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Dy, K. (2007). A history of democratic Kampuchea (1975–1979). Phnom Penh: The Documentation Center of Cambodia.Google Scholar
  14. Eisner, E. (2005). From episteme to phronesis to artistry in the study and improvement of teaching. In Reimagining schools: The selected works of Elliot W. Eisner (pp. 193–204). London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feuerbach, L. (1957). The essence of Christianity (G. Eliot, Trans.). New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
  16. Freedman, J., & Combs, G. (1996). Narrative therapy: The social construction of preferred realities. London: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  17. Fromm, E. (1973). The anatomy of human destructiveness. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  18. Fromm, E. (1994). On being human. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  19. Fromm, E. (1997). The fear of freedom. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Fromm, E. (1998). The sane society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Ganesan, N., & Kim, K. (2013). State violence in East Asia. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  22. Gardner, H. (2006). Changing minds: The art and science of changing our own and other people’s minds. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gibson, A. (2000). Ockham’s world and future. In J. Marenbon (Ed.), Routledge history of philosophy, Vol. III: Medieval philosophy (pp. 329–367). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Harcum, E. (2012a). Models of behavior; & theories of behavior. In A psychology for people of god (pp. 121–168). Lanham: Hamilton Books.Google Scholar
  25. Harcum, E. (2012b). Science and metaphysics. In A psychology for people of God (pp. 41–80). Lanham: Hamilton Books.Google Scholar
  26. Hartnack, J. (2001). Kant’s theory of knowledge: An introduction to the critique of pure reason. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub..Google Scholar
  27. Hayek, F. (1990). The fatal conceit: The errors of socialism. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Hergenhahn, B., & Henley, T. (2014). An introduction to the history of psychology. Belmont: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  29. Ho, O. (2010). How to render νόμος(nomos)of Romans into Chinese: An investigation on the interplays of textual traditions, translation paradigms and the Gospel Theory of Paul. China Graduate School of Theology Journal, 49, 45–72.Google Scholar
  30. Ho, O. (2017). On “recuperating the conscience”: From philosophical anthropology to life and values education lessons. Journal of Life Education, 9(1), 43–69.Google Scholar
  31. Hölscher, L. (2013). The religious and the secular: Semantic reconfigurations of the religious field in Germany from the eighteenth to the twentieth centuries. In Religion and secularity: Transformations and transfers of religious discourses in Europe and Asia (pp. 35–58). Leiden/Boston: BRILL.Google Scholar
  32. Hoy, D. (1978). The critical circle: Literature, history, and philosophical hermeneutics. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jun, H. (2010). Intrapersonal communication (inner dialogue). In Social justice, multicultural counseling, and practice: Beyond a conventional approach (pp. 19–58). Los Angeles/London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  34. Kant, I. (1990). Critique of pure reason (J. Meiklejohn, Trans.). Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  35. King, B., Viney, W., & Woody, W. (2013). A history of psychology: Ideas and context. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  36. Marcuse, H. (1991). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  37. Marenbon, J. (2000). The twelfth century. In J. Marenbon (Ed.), Routledge history of philosophy, Vol. Ill: Medieval philosophy (pp. 150–187). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Mulhall, S. (1996). Heidegger and Being and lime London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Neufeld, J. (2009). Redefining teacher development. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Newton, I. (1999). General Scholium. In The Principia: Mathematical principles of natural philosophy (I. Cohen, & A. Whitman, Trans.) (pp. 939–944). Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  41. Nwalutu, M. (2014). Dispiriting the spiritual in classroom education: Critiquing spirituality as a tool for transformative education in 21st-century academe. In N. Wane, F. Adyanga, & A. Ilimi (Eds.), Spiritual discourse in the academy: A globalized indigenous perspective (pp. 173–189). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  42. Poplin, M. (2014). “Is reality secular?” Testing the assumptions of four global world views. Downers Grove: IVP Books.Google Scholar
  43. Prentice, R. (1996). The spirit of education: A model for the twenty-first century. In R. Best (Ed.), Education, spirituality and the whole child (pp. 319–342). London/New York: Cassell.Google Scholar
  44. Pring, R. (2004). Knowledge out of control. In Philosophy of education (pp. 180–191).London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  45. Rao, V. (2005). History of education. New Delhi: A.P.H. Pub. Corp.Google Scholar
  46. Reid, W. (1981). The deliberative approach to the Study of the curriculum and its relation to critical pluralism. In M. Lawn, & L. Barton (Eds.), Rethinking curriculum studies: A radical approach (pp. 160–187). London/ New York: Croom Helm/Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Rhodes, J. (2013). Narrative CBT: Distinctive features. Florence: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Richert, A. (2002). Narratives that teach: Learning about teaching from the stories teachers tell. In N. Lyons & V. LaBoskey (Eds.), Narrative inquiry in practice: Advancing the knowledge of teaching (pp. 48–62). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  49. Rodger, A. (1996). Human spirituality: Towards an educational rationale. In R. Best (Ed.), Education, spirituality and the whole child (pp. 45–63). London/New York: Cassell.Google Scholar
  50. Rosenberg, A. (2000). Philosophy of science: A contemporary introduction. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Rosenberg, A., & McShea, D. (2008). Philosophy of biology: A contemporary introduction. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Rosiek, J., & Clandinin, J. (2016). Curriculum and teacher education. In D. Wyse, L. Hayward, & J. Pandya (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment, Vol. I (pp. 293–308). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  53. Rowland, C. (2017). Paul as an apocalyptist. In Stuckenbruck (Ed.), The Jewish apocalyptic tradition and the shaping of New Testament thought (pp. 131–153). Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  54. Sadovnik, A., Cookson, P., & Semel, S. (1994). Exploring education: An introduction to the foundations of education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  55. Schipani, D. (1984). Conscientization and creativity: Paulo Freire and Christian education. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  56. Scott, D. (2010). Arbitrary and non-arbitrary knowledge. In Education, epistemology and critical realism (pp. 113–125). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Searle, J. (2010). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sire, J., & Peraino, C. (2009). Deepest differences: A Christian-Atheist dialogue. Downers Grove: IVP Books.Google Scholar
  59. Smith, N. (1997). Interpretation, practical reason and tradition. In Strong hermeneutics: Contingency and moral identity (pp. 58–80). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Taylor, A. (1954). The struggle for mastery in Europe, 1848–1919. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  61. Thompson, R. (2001). Empires on the Pacific: World War II and the struggle for the mastery of Asia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  62. Watson, J., De Souza, M., & Trousdale, A. (2014). Global perspectives and contexts for spirituality in education. In J. Watson, M. de Souza, & A. Trousdale (Eds.), Global perspectives on spirituality and education (pp. 294–313). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Weaver, R. M. (1948). Ideas Have Consequences. London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  64. Westphal, M. (1998). Marx’s radical atheism. In Suspicion and faith: The religious uses of modern atheism (pp. 134–140). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Wilkinson, D. (2015). When I pray, what does God do? Oxford: Monarch Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Orlando Nang Kwok Ho
    • 1
  1. 1.The Chartered Institute of LinguistsLondonUK

Personalised recommendations