Advertisement

Examination of Sense Significance in Semantic Web Services Discovery

  • Aradhana Negi
  • Parminder Kaur
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 771)

Abstract

This chapter presents the work in progress on a hybrid approach-based generic framework for semantic web services (SWSs) discovery. The novelty of this generic framework is its pertinence and coverage for diverse semantic formalisms, natural language processing of service descriptions and user queries, classification of services, and deposition of classified services to a repository known as a concept-sense knowledge base (CSKb). This manuscript investigates the significance of senses, which are extracted either from SWS concepts or user query concepts by means of natural language processing techniques. The examination of sense significance is based upon a set of three experiments on OWLS-TC V4. The experimental evaluation signifies that the senses together with concepts substantially improve the ultimate semantic similarity score in the match-making process.

Keywords

Concept-sense knowledge base Natural language processing Semantic web services SWS discovery 

References

  1. 1.
    Nacer, H., and D. Aissani. 2014. Semantic web services: Standards, applications, challenges and solutions. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 44: 51–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2014.04.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ran, S. 2003. A model for web services discovery with QoS. ACM Sigecom Exchanges 4: 1.  https://doi.org/10.1145/844357.844360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pathak, J., N. Koul, D. Caragea, and V.G. Honavar. 2005. A framework for semantic web services discovery. In 7th ACM international workshop on web information and data management, 45–50, ACM Press, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1097047.1097057.
  4. 4.
    Zhang, C., D. Zhu, Y. Zhang, and M. Yang. 2007. A web service discovery mechanism based on immune communication. In Convergence information technology, 456–461, IEEE press, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1109/iccit.2007.1.
  5. 5.
    Ying, L. 2010. Algorithm for semantic web services clustering and discovery. In Communications and mobile computing, 532–536, IEEE Press, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1109/cmc.2010.90.
  6. 6.
    Liu, Y., and Z. Shao. 2010. A framework for semantic web services annotation and discovery based on ontology. In Informatics and Computing, 1034–1039, IEEE Press, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1109/pic.2010.5688008.
  7. 7.
    Farrag, T.A., A.I. Saleh, H.A. Ali. 2011. ASWSC: Automatic semantic web services classifier based on semantic relations. In Computer Engineering & Systems, 283–288, IEEE Press, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1109/icces.2011.6141057.
  8. 8.
    Adala, A., N. Tabbane, and S. Tabbane. 2011. A framework for automatic web service discovery based on semantics and NLP techniques. Advances in Multimedia 2011: 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/238683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sangers, J., F. Frasincar, F. Hogenboom, and V. Chepegin. 2013. Semantic Web service discovery using natural language processing techniques. Expert Systems with Applications 40: 4660–4671.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.02.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hammami, R., H. Bellaaj, A.H. Kace. 2016. A novel approach for semantic web service discovery. In Enabling technologies: Infrastructure for collaborative enterprises, 250–252, IEEE Press, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1109/wetice.2016.62.
  11. 11.
    Dietze, S., A. Gugliotta, J. Domingue. 2008. Towards context-aware semantic web service discovery through conceptual situation spaces. In Context enabled source and service selection, integration and adaptation, p. 6, ACM Press, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1361482.1361488.
  12. 12.
    Miller, G.A. 1995. WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM 38: 39–41.  https://doi.org/10.1145/219717.219748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen, F., C. Lu, H. Wu, and M. Li. 2017. A semantic similarity measure integrating multiple conceptual relationships for web service discovery. Expert Systems with Applications 67: 19–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.09.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Banerjee, S., T. Pedersen. 2003. Extended gloss overlaps as a measure of semantic relatedness. In 18th joint conference on artificial intelligence, 805–810, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  15. 15.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Guru Nanak Dev UniversityAmritsarIndia

Personalised recommendations