Advertisement

Organic Cotton pp 127-139 | Cite as

Organic Cotton and Its Environmental Impacts

  • P. Senthil Kumar
  • P. R. Yaashikaa
Chapter
Part of the Textile Science and Clothing Technology book series (TSCT)

Abstract

Organic cotton is delivered utilizing an extensive variety of cultivating practices and cotton generation is exceedingly specialized and extremely troublesome. All techniques for creating cotton have impacts that are not really earth well disposed but rather are important to deliver the product. Organic cotton creation has a progression of social and financial dangers, particularly for little ranchers in creating nations. Therapeutic expenses and a powerlessness to work are an extreme monetary weight on influenced families. The over the top utilization of synthetic manures and pesticides in monoculture causes soil debasement, lessening its supplement and water maintenance limit. As a result, agriculturists confront declining yields and need to build generation inputs. Danger of cotton preparing: Most of these chemicals, for example, substantial metals, formaldehyde, azo colours, benzidine or chlorine fade, cause natural contamination by the factories’ waste water and numerous can be found as build-ups in the completed item. Notwithstanding, developing cotton utilizing organic generation practices is not appropriate for all nations and all agriculturists. Organic production is not really any more or any less ecologically well disposed than current ordinary cotton generation. For the textile procurer, there is no contrast between routinely developed cotton and organically developed cotton as to pesticide build-ups. Developing natural cotton is more requesting and more costly than developing cotton routinely. Organic generation can be a challenge if bug weights are high however, with duty and experience, it could give value premiums to cultivators willing to address the difficulties.

Keywords

Organic cotton Environmental impacts Textile Certification Lifecycle assessment Toxic chemicals 

References

  1. 1.
    Wakelyn PJ, Chaudhry MR (2007) 5—organic cotton. In: Cotton, pp 130–175Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Makita R (2012) Fair trade and organic initiatives confronted with Bt cotton in Andhra Pradesh, India: a paradox. Geoforum 43:1232–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mohan KS, Ravi KC, Suresh PJ, Sumerford D, Head GP (2015) Field resistance to the Bacillus thuringiensis protein Cry1Ac expressed in Bollgard hybrid cotton in pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders), populations in India. Pest Manag Sci 72(4):738–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vigneshwaran D, Ananthasubramanian M, Kandhavadivu P (2014) 7—bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles. In: Bioprocessing of textiles, pp 319–397Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fox sv. (1994) Organic cotton. In: Proceedings of the international cotton conference, Bremen, pp 317–319Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Radhakrishnan S (2017) 2—sustainable cotton production. Sustain Fibre Text, 21–67Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Soltani S, Azadi H, Mahmoudi H, Witlox F (2014) Organic agriculture in Iran: farmers’ barriers to and factors influencing adoption. Renew Agric Food Syst 29:126–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hae Now (2006) Organic cotton clothing ‘Why choose organic’, http://www.haenow.com/whyorganic.php
  9. 9.
    Sharma SK, Bugalya K (2014) Competitiveness of Indian agriculture sector: a case study of cotton crop. Proc Soc Behav Sci 133:320–335Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wakelyn PJ, Chaudhry MR (2009) 11—organic cotton: production practices and post-harvest considerations. In: Sustainable textiles, pp 231–301Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marquardt S (2003) Organic cotton: production and market trends in the United States and Canada—2001 and 2003. In: Proceedings of the 2003 beltwide cotton conference. National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN, pp 362–366Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Myers D, Stolton S (eds) (1999) Organic cotton—from field to final product. Intermediate Technology Publications, Intermediate Technology Development Group, 103/105 Southampton Row, London, WC1B 4HH, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Demeritt L (2006) Behind the buzz: what consumers think of organic labelling. Org Process 3(1):14–17Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adanacioglu H, Olgun A (2012) Evaluation of the efficiency of organic cotton farmers: a case study from turkey. Bul J Agric Sci 18:418–428Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Altenbuchner C, Larcher M, Vogel S (2014) The impact of organic cotton cultivation on the livelihood of smallholder farmers in Meatu district, Tanzania. Renew Agric Food Syst, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lakerveld RP, Lele S, Crane TA, Fortuin KPJ, Springate Baginski O (2015) The social distribution of provisioning forest ecosystem services: evidence and insights from Odisha, India. Ecosyst Serv 14:56–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cotton Inc. (2012) Life cycle assessment of cotton fibre and fabric. Prepared for VISION 21, a project of the cotton foundation and managed by Cotton Incorporated, Cotton Council International and The National Cotton Council. The research was conducted by Cotton Incorporated and PE International, http://cottontoday.cottoninc.com/Life-Cycle-Assessment/
  18. 18.
    Branson A, Sood D (2015) India—cotton and products annual 2015. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service—GAIN Global Agricultural Information Network, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Patil S, Reidsma P, Shah P, Purushothaman S, Wolf J (2014) Comparing conventional and organic agriculture in Karnataka, India: where and when can organic farming be sustainable? Land Use Policy 37:40–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bello WB (2008) Problems and prospect of organic farming in developing countries. Ethiop J Environ Stud Manage 1:36–43Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chaudhry MR (2003) Limitations on organic cotton production. In: The ICAC recorder, vol XXI, p 1Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bachmann F (2012) Potential and limitations of organic and fair trade cotton for improving livelihoods of smallholders: evidence from Central Asia. Renew Agric Food Syst 27(02):138–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringSSN College of EngineeringChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations