Advertisement

The Intentions of Student-Athletes at Public Universities in Perlis, Malaysia, to Purchase Counterfeit Sporting Goods

  • Poy Hua KhorEmail author
  • Khong Chiu Lim
Conference paper

Abstract

Counterfeit business has recently attracted considerable attention. A large part of that comes from the sports world, where the sale of counterfeit goods is growing. This study examines factors influencing intentions of student-athletes at public universities in Perlis for purchasing counterfeit products. The hypotheses were tested using the independent t-test and MANOVA (multivariate analysis of variance), at the significance level of p < 0.05. The results indicated that perceived financial control exerts the greatest impact on student-athletes’ intention to purchase counterfeit sporting goods, although factors of perceived behavior and subjective norms also affected the decisions. The male youth-athletes showed higher positive attitude in relation to subjective norms and perceived behavior control to purchase counterfeit sports products. The youth-athletes perceived the same intention to acquire counterfeit sports products in relation to subjective norms, perceived behavior control, and perceived financial control, irrespective of their monthly family income. This investigation can help marketers and policy makers to understand the key influences on student-athletes’ behavior toward counterfeit sporting goods and thus to create effective marketing campaigns and anti-piracy strategies.

Keywords

Student-athlete Subjective norms Perceived behavior control Perceived financial control Counterfeit sporting goods 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments and suggestions of the reviewers, which have improved the presentation.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 178–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayub, K., & Ismail, R. (2011). Analysis of Malaysian young adults’ attitudes towards pirated products. International Journal of Information Business and Management, 3, 2–15.Google Scholar
  3. Bian, X., & Veloutsou, C. (2007). Consumers’ attitudes regarding non-deceptive counterfeit brands in the UK and China. Journal of Brand Management, 14, 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Casola, L., Kemp, S., & Mackenzie, A. (2009). Consumer decisions in the black market for stolen or counterfeit goods. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaudhry, P. E., & Zimmerman, A. (2012). Protecting your intellectual property rights: Understanding the role of management, governments, consumers and pirates. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Cheng, S. I., Fu, H. H., & Tu, L. T. C. (2011). Examining customer purchase intentions for counterfeit products based on a modified theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1, 278–284.Google Scholar
  7. Chiu, W., Lee, K. Y., & Won, D. (2014). Consumer behavior toward counterfeit sporting goods. Social Behavior and Personality, 42, 615–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cuno, A (2008). College students’ ethical perceptions on buying counterfeit products. Dissertation, University of Missouri.Google Scholar
  9. Eisend, M., & Schuchert-Güler, P. (2006). Explaining counterfeit purchases: A review and preview. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 12, 1–25.Google Scholar
  10. Haque, A., Khatibi, A., & Rahman, S. (2009). Factor influencing buying behavior of piracy products and its impact to Malaysian market. International Review of Business Research, 5, 383–401.Google Scholar
  11. Nordin, N. (2009) A study on consumers’ attitude towards counterfeit products in Malaysia. Dissertation, University of Malaya.Google Scholar
  12. Phau, I., Teah, M., & Lee, A. (2009). Targeting buyers of counterfeits of luxury brands: A study on attitudes of Singaporean consumers. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 17, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rutter, J., & Bryce, J. (2008). The consumption of counterfeit goods: Here be pirates? Society, 42, 1146–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stumpf, S. A., Chaudhry, P. E., & Perretta, L. (2011). Fake: Can business stanch the flow of counterfeit products? The Journal of Business Strategy, 32, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Walthers, A., & Buff, C. (2008). Attitudes towards counterfeiting and counterfeit products: Have they changed? Journal of International Business and Economics, 8, 79–87.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Sports Science and RecreationUniversiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan PerlisArauMalaysia
  2. 2.College of Law, Government & International StudiesUniversiti Utara MalaysiaSintokMalaysia

Personalised recommendations