Advertisement

The Effects of Psychological Capital and Proactive Personality on Undergraduate Students’ Academic Performance

  • Lee-Peng NgEmail author
  • Yuen-Onn Choong
  • Lok-Sin Kuar
  • Chun-Eng Tan
  • Sok-Yee Teoh
Conference paper

Abstract

This study is designed to examine the effects of psychological capital and proactive personality on academic performance among undergraduate students. A quota sampling approach was used, and self-administered questionnaires were distributed to undergraduate students from different faculties of a private university in Malaysia. Based on data from 390 undergraduate students, the analysis by using Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modelling showed that psychological capital and proactive personality are positively related to academic performance. Appropriate training programs, activities, and talks can be designed to enhance students’ psychological capital and to shape proactive personality. The chapter concludes with limitations of the study and suggestions for future research.

Keywords

Academic performance Psychological capital Proactive personality Undergraduate students 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work is partially supported by research grant of Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (Project No.: IPSR/RMC/UTARRF/2016/C1/N1). The authors also gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments and suggestions of the reviewers.

References

  1. Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Luthans, F. (2008). Can positive employees help positive organisational change? Impact of psychological capital and emotions on relevant attitudes and behaviours. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44, 48–70.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886307311470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Humn Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127–152.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bressler, L., Bressler, M. E., & Bressler, M. S. (2010). The role and relationship of hope, optimism, and goal setting in achieving academic success: A study of students enrolled in online accounting courses. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14(4), 37–51.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural science. Hillsdale: Lawrwnce Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Demerouti, E., van Eeuwijk, E., Snelder, M., & Wild, U. (2011). Assessing the effects of a “personal effectiveness” training on psychological capital, assertiveness and self-awareness using self-other agreement. Career Development International, 16(1), 60–81.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431111107810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DuBrin, A. J. (2013). Proactive personality and behavior for individual and organizational productivity. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effects model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarsteadt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publication.Google Scholar
  12. Hanushek, E. A. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Research, 18(4), 45–51.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1176650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khatiwada, S., Desir, M., Matrinez, L., Nelson, J., & Nguyen, C. (2013). Association of proactive personality with academic success and stress among college students. In Proceedings of Cornell College student symposium. http://symposium.cornellcollege.edu/2012/04/14/association-of-proactive-personality-with-academic-success-and-stress-among-college-students/. Assessed 20 Jan 2017.
  15. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  16. Koretz, D. (1997). Indicators of educational achievement. In R. M. Hauser, B. V. Brown, & W. R. Prosser (Eds.), Indicators of children’s well-being. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Kwek, A., Bui, H. T., Rynne, J., & So, K. K. F. (2013). The impacts of self-esteem and resilience on academic performance: An investigation of domestic and international hospitality and tourism undergraduate students. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 25(3), 110–122.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2013.826946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lesley, W., Julie, C., & Sally, J. (2011). Beyond the first-year experiences: The impact of attrition of student experience throughout undergraduate degree studies in six diverse universities. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 331–352.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903581533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 695–706.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, social and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 143–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Luthans, F., Avolio, B., Walumbwa, F., & Li, W. (2005). The psychological capital of Chinese workers: Exploring the relationship with performance. Management and Organization Review, 1, 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60, 541–572.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Luthans, B. C., Luthans, K. W., & Jensen, S. M. (2012). The impact of business school students’ psychological capital on academic performance. Journal of Education for Business, 89, 253–259.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2011.609844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luthans, B. C., Luthans, K. W., & Avey, J. B. (2014). Building the leaders of tomorrow: The development of academic psychological capital. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(2), 191–199.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051813517003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Major, D. A., Turner, J. E., & Fletcher, T. D. (2006). Linking proactive personality and the Big Five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 927–935.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S., & Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. The American Psychologist, 51(2), 77–10.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.51.2.77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2000). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36, 633–662.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodrigues, N., & Rebelo, T. (2013). Incremental validity of proactive personality over the Big Five for predicting job performance of software engineers in an innovative context. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29, 21–27.  https://doi.org/10.5093/tr2013a4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rohde, T. E., & Thompson, L. A. (2007). Predicting academic achievement with cognitive ability. Intelligence, 35(1), 83–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosen, J. A., Glennie, E. J., Dalton, B. W., Lennon, J. M., & Bozick, R. N. (2010). Noncognitive skills in the classroom: New perspectives on educational research. Research Triangle Park: RTI Press Publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect size – or why p-value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tymon, A. (2015). Proactive personality, personal initiative and academic performance: A route to employability? In Proceedings of 8th international conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI 2015), Seville, Spain.Google Scholar
  34. Vanno, V., Kaemkate, W., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). Relationships between academic performance, perceived group psychological capital, and positive psychological capital of Thai undergraduate students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3226–3230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee-Peng Ng
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yuen-Onn Choong
    • 1
  • Lok-Sin Kuar
    • 1
  • Chun-Eng Tan
    • 1
  • Sok-Yee Teoh
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Business and FinanceUniversiti Tunku Abdul RahmanKamparMalaysia

Personalised recommendations