Advertisement

Mathematical Model for Pressure–Deformation Relationship of Miniaturized McKibben Actuators

  • K. P. Ashwin
  • Ashitava GhosalEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

A McKibben actuator/Pneumatic Artificial Muscle (PAM) is a soft actuator which has great potential in the field of bioinspired robotics. Miniaturized versions of PAMs or MPAMs of less than 1.5 mm diameter are ideal actuators for developing surgical devices due to their compliance and high power-to-weight ratio. Accurate mathematical model to represent the mechanics of PAM is an ongoing research. This paper develops a mathematical model which relates the input pressure to end-point deformation of a fabricated MPAM without external loading. The developed theoretical model is validated against experimental data for MPAM of lengths 60 and 70 mm. The model predicts the deformation of MPAM with standard error of less than 10%. The model is also able to predict the locking angle of \(54.7^\circ \) at higher pressures which is a distinct characteristic of McKibben actuators.

Keywords

Miniaturized McKibben actuators Pneumatic muscles Actuated endoscopic instruments 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded in part by the Robert Bosch Center for Cyber Physical Systems (RBCCPS) at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.

References

  1. 1.
    R.H. Gaylord, Fluid actuated motor system and stroking device, 22 July 1958. US Patent 2,844,126Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. De Volder, A. Moers, D. Reynaerts, Fabrication and control of miniature McKibben actuators. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 166(1), 111–116 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Chakravarthy, K. Aditya, A. Ghosal, Experimental characterization and control of miniaturized pneumatic artificial muscle. J. Med. Devices 8(4), 041011 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K.P. Ashwin, D.P. Jose, A. Ghosal, Modeling and analysis of a flexible end-effector for actuating endoscopic catheters, in Proceedings of the 14th IFToMM World Congress (IFToMM, 2015), pp. 113–120Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    I.A. Gravagne, I.D. Walker, On the kinematics of remotely-actuated continuum robots, in Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA’00 vol. 3 (IEEE, 2000), pp. 2544–2550Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Schulte, The application of external power in prosthetics and orthotics, The Characteristics of the McKibben Artificial Muscle, National Research Council, vol. 874 (1961)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Tondu, Modelling of the McKibben artificial muscle: a review. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 23(3), 225–253 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C.S. Kothera, M. Jangid, J. Sirohi, N.M. Wereley, Experimental characterization and static modeling of McKibben actuators. J. Mech. Des. 131(9), 091010 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C.S. Jog, Continuum Mechanics, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C.-P. Chou, B. Hannaford, Measurement and modeling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 12(1), 90–102 (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Zhou, M. Accorsi, J. Leonard, A new finite element for modeling pneumatic muscle actuators. Comput. Struct. 82(11), 845–856 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Chen, K. Ushijima, Prediction of the mechanical performance of McKibben artificial muscle actuator. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 78, 183–192 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Krishnan, J. Bishop-Moser, C. Kim, S. Kota, Kinematics of a generalized class of pneumatic artificial muscles. J. Mech. Robot. 7(4), 041014 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of ScienceBengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations