Costs and Benefits of Market-Based Instruments in Accelerating Low-Carbon Energy Transition

  • Tilak K. Doshi


This chapter provides a discussion on costs and benefits of market-based instruments (MBIs) in accelerating low-carbon energy transitions. MBIs are contrasted with discretionary government policies such as mandated energy efficiency standards and subsidy support for renewable energy. After providing a brief survey of existing carbon pricing schemes and trends, the chapter discusses the literature on costs and benefits of carbon pricing with a focus on Asia.


Carbon tax Emission trading scheme (ETS) Energy transitions 


  1. Australian Government, Treasury. 2011. Strong growth, low pollution: Modelling a carbon price. Accessed at’snewdirectactionscepticsolidated.pdf.
  2. Bodansky, Daniel, et al. 2014. Facilitating linkage of heterogeneous regional, national, and sub-national climate policies through a future international agreement. Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, November.Google Scholar
  3. Bovenberg, A. Lans, and Lawrence H. Goulder. 1994. Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: General equilibrium analyses. NBER Working Paper No. 4897, October.Google Scholar
  4. BP. 2016. Annual Statistical Review of World Energy 2016.Google Scholar
  5. Chan, Gabriel et al. 2012a. The SO2 allowance trading system and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990: Reflections on twenty years of policy innovation. Harvard Kennedy School of Government, Faculty Research Working Paper Series, January 2012.Google Scholar
  6. Chan, Gabriel et al. 2012b. The SO2 Allowance Trading System and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990: Reflections on Twenty Years of Policy Innovation. Cambridge: Harvard Environmental Economics Program, January 2012.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, Ling. 2017. China and Asia-Pacific Carbon Markets. The Diplomat, June 2nd. Accessed at
  8. China Daily. 2017. China to launch world’s largest carbon market soon, February 16th.Google Scholar
  9. Clack, Christopher et al. 2017. Evaluation of a proposal for reliable low-cost grid power with 100% wind, water, and solar. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences approved February 24, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doshi, Tilak. 2015. Singapore in a Post-Kyoto World: Energy, Environment and the Economy. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  11. Doshi, Tilak. 2017. Carbon tax could hobble oil sector’s competitive edge. Straits Times, 17 May 2017.Google Scholar
  12. Elliot, Cara. 2011. Friedrich von Hayek: The socialist-calculation debate, knowledge arguments, and modern economic development. Gettysburg Economic Review 5 Article 6.Google Scholar
  13. Ergas, Henry and Alex, Robson. 2012. Modelling as Agit-prop: The treasury’s role in Australia’s carbon tax debate. Agenda. Accessed at Griffith Research Online
  14. European Commission. undated. EU emission trading system. factsheet, undated accessed at
  15. Goulder, Lawrence H. 2000. Economic impacts of environmental policies. NBER Reporter: Spring 2000, June 28.Google Scholar
  16. Government of Australia, Department of Climate Change. 2014. Starting emissions trading on 1 July 2014 policy summary.Google Scholar
  17. Government of Singapore, National Climate Change Secretariat. no date. Carbon Taxes. Accessed at
  18. Griffiths, Emma. 2013. Tony Abbott tells National Press Club that election will be referendum on carbon tax. ABC News, 2 September 2013.Google Scholar
  19. He, Laura. 2017. China’s national carbon trading rollout expected to have major impact on key industries. South China Morning Post, 2 April, 2017.Google Scholar
  20. Helm, Dieter. 2010. Government failure, rent-seeking, and capture: the design of climate change policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 26(2):182–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hood, Christina. 2013. Managing interactions between carbon pricing and existing energy policies: Guidance for policymakers. IEA Insight Series, 2013.Google Scholar
  22. Inglis, Bob and Arthur Laffer. 2008. An emission plan conservatives could warm to. New York Times, December 27, 2008.Google Scholar
  23. International Energy Agency (IEA). 2015. Energy Technologies Perspectives, Paris, 2015.Google Scholar
  24. Jacobsen, Mark et al. 2017. Low-cost solution to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of intermittent wind, water, and solar for all purposes. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, approved November 2, 2015, vol. 112, No. 49. Accessed on 1 June 2017
  25. Jindal, Gautam. 2017. Will Singapore’s power sector bear the brunt of its carbon tax? Asian Power, 20 April 2017. Accessed at
  26. Martin, Richard. 2016. Germany Runs Up Against the Limits of Renewables. MIT Technology Review, May 24, 2016.Google Scholar
  27. Mehling, Michael and Benjamin, Görlach. 2016. Multilateral linking of emissions trading systems. MIT Centre of Energy and Environmental Policy Research Working Paper, CEEPR WP 2016-009, April 2016.Google Scholar
  28. Murphy, Robert. 2012. Carbon Tax Swap deals: Review and critique. Institute for Energy Research, November. Accessed at
  29. Muse, Stancil and Co. 2001. Refinery profitability statistics (begin). Oil and Gas Journal, 15 January 2001.Google Scholar
  30. Muse, Stancil and Company. 2017. “Singapore Carbon Taxes” Presentation to the American Chambers of Commerce Singapore, 13 July 2017.Google Scholar
  31. National Treasury, Republic of South Africa. 2013. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and facilitating the transition to a green economy. Carbon Tax Policy Paper. May 2013.Google Scholar
  32. Nordhaus, William D. 1993. Optimal greenhouse gas reductions and tax policy in the ‘DICE’ model. American Economic Review 83: 313–317.Google Scholar
  33. Nordhaus, W.D. 2007. A review of the stern review on the economics of climate. Journal of Economic Literature 45(3): 686–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nordhaus, William. 2008. A question of balance: Weighing the options on global warming policies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Pindyck, Robert S. 2013. Climate change policy: What do the models tell us? National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 19244, July 2013. Accessed on 8 May 2017,
  36. Robson, Alex. 2014. Australia’s carbon tax: An economic evaluation. Economic Affairs (Griffiths University). Accessed at Scholar
  37. Schultz, George P. and James A. Baker III. 2017. A conservative answer to climate change: Enacting a carbon tax would free up private firms to find the most efficient ways to cut emissions. The Wall Street Journal, February 7, 2017.Google Scholar
  38. Smil, Vaclav. 2013. Energy Transitions. World Energy Forum, Energy Vision 2013, prepared in partnership with HIS CERA.Google Scholar
  39. Smil, Vaclav. 2016. Examining energy transitions: A dozen insights based on performance. Energy Research and Social Science 22 (2016): 194–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Soh, Andrea. 2017. Carbon tax likely to be passed on to end consumers (Amended). Business Times, February 22, 2017.Google Scholar
  41. Stavins, Robert. 1997. Economic Incentives for Environmental Regulation. Belfer Center Discussion Paper, Harvard University, June accessed on 02 June 2017, at
  42. Stern, Nicholas. 2006. Stern review on the economics of climate change. Accessed at HM Treasury website at,
  43. Thwaites, Joe. 2015. What Does the Paris Agreement do for Finance? World Resources Institute, 18 December 2015.Google Scholar
  44. Timmons, Roberts and Romain, Weikmans. 2015. The Unfinished Agenda of the Paris Climate Talks: Finance to the Global South. Brookings Institution, December 22, 2015. Accessed at
  45. Tol, Richard S.J. 2017. The social cost of carbon: Trends, outliers and catastrophes. Economics E-Journal, Vol. 2, 2008-25 August 12, 2008. Accessed 2 June 2017 at Scholar
  46. Tracht, Joel P. 2016. WTO law constraints on border tax adjustment and tax credit mechanisms to reduce the competitive effects of carbon taxes. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper, January.Google Scholar
  47. Twidale, Susanna. 2017. Analysts trim EU carbon price forecasts as supply swells. Reuters, January 9, 2017. Accessed on 02 June, 2017 at
  48. Wood Mackenzie. 2017. Singapore carbon pricing: An accelerating trend? 7 April 2017. Accessed at
  49. World Bank. 2015. State and trends in carbon pricing 2015, Washington DC, October 2015.Google Scholar
  50. World Bank. 2016. State and trends in carbon pricing 2016, Washington DC, October 2016.Google Scholar
  51. UNFCCC. no date. Kyoto protocol: Clean development mechanism. Accessed on June 2, 2017 at

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Doshi ConsultingSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations