Dawn of Corporate Governance: Japan Must Change

Chapter

Abstract

Asian Corporate Governance Association White Paper (2008) and global investor surveys (Yanagi in The ROE revolution and financial strategy. Chuokeizai-Sha, 2015.) have revealed that foreign investors have harsh views and deep dissatisfaction with Corporate Japan in connection to its value-destruction arising out of the lack of corporate governance (CG) and capital efficiency (ROE) in comparison with the other advanced nations in the world. This situation is deeply rooted in the historical bank-dominance culture in Japan as evidenced by significant cross-shareholdings. However, in the wake of a collapse of the bubble economy and ensuing unwinding of cross-shareholdings, Japan has been transitioning from debt-governance to equity governance. Having learned from the voices of foreign investors who replaced cross-holdings, the Abe administration in Japan finally adopted the Stewardship Code (SC) in 2014 and the Corporate Governance Code (CGC) in 2015. This will be the dawn of Japan’s CG improvement. This chapter serves as an introduction to this change.

Keywords

Debt-governance Equity-governance Cross-shareholdings Stewardship code Corporate governance code The Ito review 

References

  1. Asian Corporate Governance Association (ACGA). (2008). White Paper on Corporate Governance in Japan.Google Scholar
  2. Financial Services Agency. (2014). Principles for responsible institutional investors ≪Japan’s Stewardship Code≫ -To promote sustainable growth of companies through investment and dialogue.Google Scholar
  3. Financial Services Agency, Tokyo Stock Exchange, Inc. (2015). Japan’s Corporate Governance Code [Final Proposal] Seeking Sustainable Corporate Growth and Increased Corporate Value over the Mid-to Long-Term.Google Scholar
  4. Kondo, K., Yanagi, R. (2013). Financial, IR & SR strategies for improvement of Corporate value. Chuokeizai-Sha.Google Scholar
  5. Life Insurance Association of Japan. (2015). Survey results on approaches toward enhancing equity values FY2014. Life Insurance Association of Japan.Google Scholar
  6. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. (2014). Ito review of competitiveness and incentives for sustainable growth—Building favorable relationships between companies and investors—Final Report.Google Scholar
  7. Moving the mountain study group. (2014). Reform Japan, the LLDC (least less developed country) of ROE. Nikkei Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Yanagi, R. (2015). The ROE revolution and financial strategy. Chuokeizai-Sha.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EisaiBunkyōJapan

Personalised recommendations