Advertisement

Thermal Comfort in Indian Apartments

  • Madhavi IndragantiEmail author
  • Kavita Daryani Rao
Chapter

Abstract

Socio-political and economic drivers can be historically traced behind the apartments evolutionary trajectory. Absence and poor adherence to norms appear to have caused thermal discomfort. It pushed occupants toward energy-intensive solutions. India needs to embrace the adaptive thermal comfort model to unburden her import-dependent energy balances. Occupant responses from real buildings underpin this model. This chapter focuses on the field studies in apartments. People in naturally ventilated apartments expressed comfort at 30.3 °C during the hot and warm-humid seasons. Thermal condition indoors varied adaptively with the outdoors. However, discomfort was high in summer. The subjects accustomed to air conditioners had lower comfort temperature. This cyclic path dependency works against India’s sustainability agenda.

Keywords

Indian apartments Thermal comfort Adaptive model Warm-humid climate Field survey Comfort temperature 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Indraganti VS Prasad funded the Hyderabad thermal comfort surveys. Late Allakky Sreenivas, Rajyalakshmi, Sarma AVRJ, Ratnavati, C. Rajeswari, Lahari, Dhanya, Lohita, and Yashwanth assisted us. We thank all of them. Over a hundred residents responded, even foregoing their post-meal siestas. We are forever grateful to them.

References

  1. 1.
    Gallion BA, Eisner S (1963) The urban Pattern City planning and design. D. Van Nostrand, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Indraganti M (2009) Thermal comfort and adaptive use of controls in summer: An investigation of apartments in Hyderabad. PhD thesis. JNAFA University, HyderabadGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhattacharjee KP (2004) House desgin with local climate and materials. J Inidan Inst Archit 11:29–34Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    IEA (2013) Energy balances of non-OECD countries. International Energy AgencyGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    BIS (2005) National building code 2005. Bureau of Indian Standards, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Indraganti M (2010) Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated apartments in summer: findings from a field study in Hyderabad, India. Appl Energy 87(3):866–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Indraganti M (2010) Adaptive use of natural ventilation for thermal comfort in Indian apartments. Build Environ 45:1490–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Humphreys MA, Nicol JF (2002) The validity of ISO-PMV for predicting comfort votes in every-day thermal environments. Energ Buildings 34(6):667–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sharma MR, Ali S (1986) Tropical summer index – a study of thermal comfort in Indian subjects. Build Environ 21(1):11–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rijal HB, Honjo M, Kobayashi R, Nakaya T (2013) Investigation of comfort temperature, adaptive model and the window-opening behaviour in Japanese houses. Archit Sci Rev 56(1):54–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nicol JF, Roaf S (1996) Pioneering new indoor temperature standards: the Pakistan project. Energ Buildings 23:169–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Singh S (2016) Seasonal evaluation of adaptive use of controls in multi-storied apartments: a field study in composite climate of north India. Int J Sustain Built Environ 5:83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rajasekar E, Ramachandraiah A (2011) A study on thermal parameters in residential buildings associated with hot humid environments. Archit Sci Rev 54(1):23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Indraganti M, Ooka R, Rijal HB, Brager GS (2014) Adaptive model of thermal comfort for offices in hot and humid climates of India. Build Environ 74(4):39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    CEN:15251 (2007) Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings: addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics. Commite European de Normalisation, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Indraganti M (2010) Using the adaptive model of thermal comfort for obtaining indoor neutral temperature: findings from a field study in Hyderabad, India. Build Environ 45(3):519–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Indraganti M, Rao KD (2010) Effect of age, gender, economic group and tenure on thermal comfort: a field study in residential buildings in hot and dry climate with seasonal variations. Energ Buildings 42(3):273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karyono TH (2000) Report on thermal comfort and building energy studies in Jakarta, Indonesia. Build Environ 35:77–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shove E (2002) Converging-conventions. Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, Lancaster. http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Shove-Converging-Conventions.pdf
  20. 20.
    Humphreys MA (1995) Thermal comfort temperatures and the habits of hobbits. In: Nicol J, Humphreys MA, Sykes O, Roaf S (eds) Standards for thermal comfort: indoor air temperature standards. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 3–13Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architecture and Urban PlanningCollege of Engineering, Qatar UniversityDohaQatar
  2. 2.Department of ArchitectureJawaharlal Nehru Architecture and Fine Arts UniversityHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations