What Tourism Can Do: The Fall of Pastoral Manali Resort in the Kulu Valley of the Indian Himalayas

  • Tej Vir Singh
  • Masood A. Naqvi
  • Gaitree (Vanessa) Gowreesunkar
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives on Asian Tourism book series (PAT)

Abstract

Tourism is a queer paradox. It can be benign and malign, and at times it can conserve and consume resources, protect natural capital while damages heritage and so on. This dualism in tourism is not inherent or native to its character, but it is due to some policy failure, bad planning, ill governance, poor management of skills or want of new knowledge. This chapter shall illustrate the case of Manali in the Indian Himalayas which is now transformed from a rural pastoral settlement to an urban destination due to lack of sustainable pro-growth policy and tourism intelligence inaction. Efforts are being made for implementing sustainable tourism policy through ‘Explore Rural India Project’ that shall decongest Manali destination and diversify tourism activity all-through the Kulu Valley with Naggar as a satellite resort.

Keywords

Green tourism Tourism intelligence Governance Knowledge transfer Manali Indian Himalayas 

References

  1. Acerenza, M. A. (1985). Planificationestrategia del tourismo: Esquemametodologico. EstudiosTuriticos, 85, 47–70.Google Scholar
  2. Bosselman, F. P., Peterson, C. A., & McCarthy, C. (1999). Managing tourism growth: Issues and applications. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bramwell, B., & Lane, B. (2012). Tourism governance: Critical perspective on governance and sustainability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, R. W. (1974). Problem in the prediction of tourism development: Theoretical approach. In J. Matznetter (Ed.), Studies in geography of tourism. Frankfurt: Goethe University.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, R. W. (2015). Sustainable tourism – The undefinable and unachievable pursued by the unrealistic? In T. V. Singh (Ed.), Challenges in tourism research (pp. 234–241). Clevedon: Channel View.Google Scholar
  6. Chauhan, P. (2009). The problem of tourism growth management in the Himalayas: The case of Manali in the Kullu Valley, Unpublished Ph. D., thesis. Institute of Vocational Studies, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla.Google Scholar
  7. Cooper, C. (2015). Transferring tourism knowledeg: A challenge for tourism educators and researchers. In T. V. Singh (Ed.), Challenges in tourism research (pp. 310–319). Bristol: CVP.Google Scholar
  8. Dogra, C. S. (2006). Ford vs the icons. Outlook, 6, 48–49.Google Scholar
  9. Environment and Development Design Trust (EDDT). (1976). EDDT report. Shimla: Government of Himachal Pradesh.Google Scholar
  10. Gardner, J., Sinclair, J., Berkes, F., & Singh, R. B. (2002). Accelerated tourism development and its impacts in Kulu-Manali, HP, India. Tourism Recreation Research, 27(3), 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gill, A. M., & Williams, P. W. (2012). Rethinking resort growth: Understanding evolving governance in Whistler, British Columbia. In B. Bramwell & B. Lane (Eds.), Tourism governance: Critical perspectives on governance and sustainability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Goulet, R. (1993). Society, policy and policy analysis – Review and critique of a theoretical debate, Unpublished paper. Toronto: York University.Google Scholar
  13. Kuniyal, J. C., Vishvakarma, S. C. R., Badola, H. K., & Jain, A. P. (2004). Tourism in Kulu Valley – An environmental assessment. Almora: GBPIHED.Google Scholar
  14. Murphy, P. E. (1985). Tourism: A community approach. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
  15. Pubby, V. (1988). Simla then and now: Summer capital of the Raj. New Delhi: Indus Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Richter, L. (1989). The politics of tourism in Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sanibel Plan. (1976). Retrieved from http://www.mysanibel.com/content/download/539/3306.
  18. Sheehan, L., Vargas-Sanchez, A., Presenza, A., & Abbate, T. (2016). The use of intelligence in tourism destination management: An emerging role for DMOs. International Journal of Tourism Research, 18(6), 549–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Singh, T. V. (1989). The Kulu valley: Impacts of tourism development in the mountain areas. New Delhi: Himalayan Books.Google Scholar
  20. Singh, T. V. (1992). Tourism in the mountains: Searching for strategies of sustainable development. In A. Gill & R. Hartmann (Eds.), Mountain resort development (proceedings of the Vail conference) (pp. 187–198). Burnaby: Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  21. Singh, S. (2008). Destination development dilemma – Case of Manali in Himachal Himalaya. Tourism Management, 29(6), 1152–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Singh, T. V., & Singh, S. (1998). Managing heritage resources for sustainable development of tourism: The case of Kulu Valley in the Indian Himalaya. In Conference proceedings of 4th Asia Pacific tourism conference on the role of tourism: National and regional perspective, Tanyang, Chung-Buk, Korea, August 18–21, 1998.Google Scholar
  23. Strong, A. M., Rimmer, C. C., McFarland, K. P., & Hagen, K. (2009). Effects of mountain resorts on wildlife. In J. E. Milne, J. LeMense, & R. A. Virginia (Eds.), Mountain resorts: Ecology and the law (pp. 99–126). Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Williams, T. A. (1982). Impact of domestic tourism on host population: The evolution of a model. New Delhi: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tej Vir Singh
    • 1
  • Masood A. Naqvi
    • 1
  • Gaitree (Vanessa) Gowreesunkar
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Tourism Research and DevelopmentLucknowIndia
  2. 2.Mauritius Institute of EducationMokaMauritius

Personalised recommendations