Advertisement

In House Laboratory Method Validation and Uncertainty Determination of 28 Pesticides in Spinach by Gas Chromatography Using Electron Capture (ECD) and Mass Spectrometric (MS) Detector

  • Sudeep Mishra
  • Neelam Richhariya
  • Samsul Alam
  • Lalitesh K. Thakur
Conference paper

Abstract

Study conducted to develop and validate laboratory method using QuEChERS method. QuEChER method was used for the determination of 28 pesticide residues belongs to organochlorine, synthetic pyrethroids and herbicides in Spinach. Sample was extracted by ethyl acetate. Removal of moisture using from sample extract by anhydrous sodium sulphate and magnesium sulphate. Cleaning of matrix and other interferences was done by Primary Secondary Amine (PSA), C18 and activated charcoal. Agilent 7890B model GC-ECD with 7693 auto sampler and 7890A-Agilent Technologies GC with 5975C inert XL EI/CI MSD triple axis mass detector with DB-5MS fused silica capillary column were used for analysis of samples taken for study. Each pesticide spiking concentration was 0.05 ppm level in three replicate whose recovery lies between Codex permissible limit i.e. 70–120%. Relative standard deviation (RSD) < 15%. Codex norms were followed for repeatability and reproducibility check of the instrument. For Linearity check, taking area of lambda cyhalothrin against five different concentration levels of 0.003, 0.010, 0.100, 0.70, 1.00 mg/kg, calibration curve was plotted with regression co-efficient (r2) 0.993. Total uncertainty or combined uncertainty comprise of three main independent uncertainties arise due to weighing of standards, purity of the standard and repeatability of instruments. Expanded uncertainty is twice of the combined uncertainty which lies in three ranges viz., (a) ≤10% (b) 11–15% and (c) 15–20%. All pesticides taken for study were in the range (a) i.e. ≤10%.

Keywords

Spinach Pesticides LOD LOQ QuEChERS Uncertainty 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are highly grateful to the Director, Institute of Pesticide Formulation Technology for allowing them to use the research facilities for the work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Anastassiades M, Lehotay SJ, Stajnbaher D, Schenck FJ (2003) Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and “dispersive solid-phase extraction” for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J AOAC Int 86:412–431PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hernandez-Borges J, Cabrera JC, Rodriguez-Delgado MA et al (2009) Analysis of pesticide residues in bananas harvested in the Canary Islands (Spain). Food Chem 113:313–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lehotay SJ, De Kok A, Hiemstra M et al (2005) Validation of a fast and easy method for the determination of residues from 229 pesticides in fruits and vegetables using gas and liquid chromatography and mass spectrometric detection. J AOAC Int 88:595–614PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nguyen TD, Yu JE, Lee DM, Lee GH (2008) A multiresidue method for the determination of 107 pesticides in cabbage and radish using QuEChERS sample preparation method and gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Food Chem 110:207–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paya P, Anastassiades M, Mack D et al (2007) Analysis of pesticide residues using the Quick Easy Cheap Effective Rugged and Safe (QuEChERS) pesticide multiresidue method in combination with gas and liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometric detection. Anal Bioanal Chem 389:1697–1714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lehotay SJ (2007) Determination of pesticide residues in foods by acetonitrile extraction and partitioning with magnesium sulfate: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 90:485–520PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG 4, EURACHEM/ CITAC Guide (2000) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 2nd edGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sanyal D, Rani A, Alam S et al (2011) Development validation and uncertainty measurement of multi-residue analysis of organochlorine and organophosphorus pesticides using pressurized liquid extraction and dispersive-SPE techniques. Environ Monit Assess 182:97–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saini MK, Mishra S, Alam S et al (2016) Method development and validation of multiclass pesticide residues and metabolites in wheat by GC-ECD and GC-MS. Asian J Res Chem 9(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mishra S, Saini MK, Alam S et al (2015) Determination of 25 pesticides By GC-ECD And MSD with measurement of uncertainty in tomato using modified QuEChERS technique. J Appl Chem 4(1):221–231Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Corley J (2002) Best practices in establishing detection and quantification limits for pesticide residues in foods. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, North Brunswick, NJ, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Corley J (2003) Best practices in establishing detection and quantification limits for pesticide residues in foods. In: Handbook of residue analytical methods for agrochemicals. Wiley, New York, USA, pp 59–74Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Corley J (2005) Handbook of residue analytical methods for agrochemicals. Wiley, p. 59Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sudeep Mishra
    • 1
  • Neelam Richhariya
    • 2
  • Samsul Alam
    • 1
  • Lalitesh K. Thakur
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Pesticide Formulation Technology (Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers, Govt. of India)GurugramIndia
  2. 2.Govt. Indra College SatnaSatnaIndia

Personalised recommendations