Advertisement

Quality Control and Laboratory Organization

  • Pranab Dey
Chapter

Abstract

The term quality control indicates the collection of operational techniques to verify and maintain a desired set level of quality in the laboratory test or process. It is a continuous process and it starts immediately from receiving the specimen to the final dispatch of the report along with post verification of the test result. Quality assurance means the systemic monitoring and evaluation of various areas of the quality control result and quality practice so that the laboratory delivers excellent healthcare service. The quality control involves three important steps: pre-analytic, analytic and post-analytic phases. The present chapter covers the various aspects of these three phases of quality control. The chapter also covers the organization of the pathology laboratory and discusses on laboratory construction and equipment, laboratory staffs, organization set-up and laboratory protocol.

Keywords

Quality control Quality assurance Pre-analytic Analytic Post-analytic phase External quality assurance Proficiency test Laboratory organization 

References

  1. 1.
    Travers H, Davey D, editors. Quality improvement manual in anatomic pathology. Chicago: College of American Pathologists; 1993.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. Recommendations for quality assurance and improvement in surgical and autopsy pathology. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30(11):1469–71. Erratum in: Am J Surg Pathol. 2007 Jan;31(1):16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Royal College of Pathologists. Medical and scientific staffing of NHS pathology departments. London: Royal College of Pathologists; 1992.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clinical laboratory improvement amendments of 1988. Final rule. Fed Regist. 1992;57:493. 1257(b).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Venkatraman NT, Bhadranna A, Shenoy S, Mohanty L. To err is human: quality management practices in surgical oral pathology, a safety net for medico-legal complications. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2013;17(2):234–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clinical laboratory improvement amendments of 1988. Final rule. Fed Regist. 1992;57:493. 1105Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roberts PF, Chairman RCPath EQA steering committee for histopathology and cytopathology, 2001, Personal Communication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pranab Dey
    • 1
  1. 1.Education and Research (PGIMER)Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER)ChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations