Advertisement

Mobile STEM Learning Scenarios

  • Sandy SchuckEmail author
  • Peter Aubusson
  • Kevin Burden
  • Sue Brindley
Chapter
  • 367 Downloads

Abstract

In both the professional rhetoric and academic literature, mobile learning is frequently positioned to realise the aspirations of STEM educators who seek to implement inquiry-based learning within authentic and collaborative contexts, mimicking the processes and settings real STEM practitioners experience. The reality maybe somewhat different, as this study demonstrates, with students often shackled by the physical boundaries of the classroom and limited degrees of choice granted to them as independent agents in the learning process. Rather than mediating access to external expertise and collaborative know-how, data derived from a recent international online survey of STEM educators, suggests mobile technologies are only rarely used to support the sharing and exchange of data between students or to engage in ‘conversations’ and dialogue with ‘outsiders’ in the way real STEM practitioners commonly behave. This conundrum forms the basis of this chapter, which adopts scenario production and analysis as a methodological approach to help STEM educators reconceptualise their use of mobile technologies across various different futures. These ‘futures’ are set out neither as predictions nor as prognoses but rather as stimuli to encourage greater discussion and reflection around the use of mobile technologies in STEM education. In considering four alternative futures for STEM education we conclude that ‘seamless learning’, whereby students are empowered to use their mobile technologies to negotiate across boundaries (e.g. between school and out-of-school activities), may be the most significant factor in encouraging educators to rethink their existing pedagogical patterns, thereby realizing some of the aspirations which have yet to be achieved in inquiry-based STEM education. The chapter concludes with an analysis of the ways in which teacher education might respond to future challenges and opportunities emerging from recent research in mobile learning.

Keywords

Scenario planning Mobile learning STEM learning Collaborative learning Inquiry-based learning Scenario building 

References

  1. Aubusson, P., Griffin, J., & Kearney, M. (2012). Learning beyond the classroom: Implications for school science. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), The second international handbook of science education (pp. 1123–1134). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aubusson, P., & Schuck, S. (2013). Teacher education futures: Today’s trends, tomorrow’s expectations. Teacher Development, 17(3), 322–333.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2013.813768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burden, K., Hopkins, P., Male, T., Martin, S., & Trala, C. (2012). iPad Scotland evaluation. Faculty of Education, The University of Hull, UK. Retrieved from http://www2.hull.ac.uk/ifl/ipadresearchinschools.aspx.
  4. Burden, K., & Kearney, M. (2016). Future scenarios for mobile science learning. Research in Science Education, 1–22. Google Scholar
  5. Burden, K., & Kearney, M. (2017). Investigating and critiquing teacher educators’ mobile learning practices. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(2), 110–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cann, A. (2010). Scenario based strategic planning in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works Program. IWR White Paper. Retrieved from http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/Portals/70/docs/iwrreports/Scenario-BasedStrategicPlanning.pdf.
  7. Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Codd, J. A., Brown, M., Clark, J., Mcpherson, H., O’Neill, J., O’Neill, H., Waitere-Ang, & Zepke, N. (2002). Review of future-focused research on teaching and learning. Wellington: Ministry of Education New Zealand.Google Scholar
  9. Crooks, C. (1999). Computers in the community of classrooms. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers. Analysing productive interaction (pp. 102–117). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. DeGennaro, D. (2012). Evolving learning designs and emerging technologies. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), The second international handbook of science education (pp. 1319–1331). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunleavy, M., & Dede, C. (2014). Augmented reality teaching and learning. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 735–745). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foley, B. J., & Reveles, J. M. (2014). Pedagogy for the connected science classroom: Computer supported collaborative science and the next generation science standards. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 14(4). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol14/iss4/science/article1.cfm.
  13. Green, L., Hechter, R., Tysinger, P., & Chassereau, K. (2014). Mobile app selection for 5th through 12th grade science: The development of the MASS rubric. Computers & Education, 75, 65–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herodotou, C., Villasclaras-Fernández, E., & Sharples, M. (2014). The design and evaluation of a sensor-based mobile application for citizen inquiry science investigations. In Open Learning and Teaching in Educational Communities (pp. 434–439). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Martín, S. (2013). Technology outlook for STEM+ education 2013–2018: An NMC horizon project sector analysis. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
  17. Jonassen, D. H., Carr, C., & Yueh, H. P. (1998). Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking. TechTrends, 43(2), 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones, A. C., Scanlon, E., & Clough, G. (2013). Mobile learning: Two case studies of supporting inquiry learning in informal and semiformal settings. Computers & Education, 61, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kamarainen, A. M., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T., Browne, A., Mazzuca, D., Tutwiler, M. S., et al. (2013). EcoMOBILE: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips. Computers & Education, 68, 545–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kearney, M., Burden, K., & Rai, T. (2015). Investigating teachers’ adoption of signature mobile pedagogies. Computers & Education, 80, 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kearney, M., & Maher, D. (2013). Mobile learning in maths teacher education: Driving pre-service teachers’ professional development. Australian Educational Computing, 27(3), 76–84.Google Scholar
  22. Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 2.  https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0/14406.
  23. Kinash, S., Brand, J., & Mathew, T. (2012). Challenging mobile learning discourse through research: Student perceptions of Blackboard Mobile Learn and iPads. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4).  https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.832.
  24. Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 283–315). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
  25. Lai, K. W., Khaddage, F., & Knezek, G. (2013). Blending student technology experiences in formal and informal learning. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 29(5), 414–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ling, R., & Donner, J. (2009). Mobile communications. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  27. Lui, M., Kuhn, A., Acosta, A., Niño-Soto, M. I., Quintana, C., & Slotta, J. D. (2014). Using mobile tools in immersive environments to support science inquiry. In CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 403–406). ACM.Google Scholar
  28. Marty, P. F., Alemanne, N. D., Mendenhall, A., Maurya, M., Southerland, S. A., Sampson, V., et al. (2013). Scientific inquiry, digital literacy, and mobile computing in informal learning environments. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mifsud, L. (2014). Mobile learning and the socio-materiality of classroom practices. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 142–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Murray, O., & Olcese, N. (2011). Teaching and learning with iPads: Ready or not? TechTrends, 55(6), 42–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Norris, C. A., & Soloway, E. (2011). Learning and schooling in the age of mobilism. Educational Technology, 51(6), 3–12.Google Scholar
  32. OECD. (2001). Schooling for tomorrow. Paris, OECD): What schools for the future.Google Scholar
  33. Pachler, N., Bachmair, B., & Cook, J. (2009). Mobile learning: Structures, agency, practices. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(2), 78–102.Google Scholar
  35. Parry, D. (2011). Mobile perspectives: On teaching mobile literacy. Educause Review, 46, 14–18.Google Scholar
  36. Peluso, D. (2012). The fast-paced iPad revolution: Can educators stay up to date and relevant about these ubiquitous devices? British Journal of Educational Technology, 43.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01310.x.
  37. Radinsky, J., Bouillion, L., Lento, E., & Gomez, L. (2001). Mutual benefit partnership: A curricular design for authenticity. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(4), 405–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Royle, K., & Hadfield, M. (2012). From ‘posh pen & pad’ to participatory pedagogies: One story of a netbook implementation project with 108 pupils in two primary schools. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 4(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rushby, N. (2012). Editorial: An agenda for mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 355–356.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01313.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scanlon, E., Woods, W., & Clow, D. (2014). Informal participation in science in the UK: Identification, location and mobility with iSpot. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 58–71.Google Scholar
  41. Schuck, S., & Aubusson, P. (2010). Educational scenarios for digital futures. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(3), 293–305.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2010.509351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schuck, S. (2016). Enhancing teacher education in primary mathematics with mobile technologies. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 126–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schuler, C., Winters, N., & West, M. (2012). The future of mobile learning: Implications for policy makers and planners. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  44. Schwartz, P. (1997). The art of the long vie. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Sharples, M. (2013). Mobile learning: Research, practice and challenges. Distance Education in China, 3(5), 5–11.Google Scholar
  46. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of e-learning research (pp. 221–224). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shell, (2003). Scenarios: An explorer’s guide. London: Shell.Google Scholar
  48. Snoek, M. (2005). Scenario writing in education: Teaching guidelines for an in-service course for teachers and teacher educators. Brussels/Amsterdam: Association for Teacher Education. in Europe.Google Scholar
  49. Snoek, M. (2013). From splendid isolation to crossed boundaries? The futures of teacher education in the light of activity theory. Teacher Development, 17(3), 307–321.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2013.813758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Snoek, M., Baldwin, G., Cautreels, P., Enemaerke, T., Halstead, V., Hilton, G., et al. (2003). Scenarios for the future of teacher education in Europe. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(1), 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Song, Y. (2014). “Bring your own device (BYOD)” for seamless science inquiry in a primary school. Computers & Education, 74, 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Toh, Y., So, H. J., Seow, P., Chen, W., & Looi, C. K. (2013). Seamless learning in the mobile age: a theoretical and methodological discussion on using cooperative inquiry to study digital kids on-the-move. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(3), 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Traxler, J. (2008). Current state of mobile learning. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile learning transforming the delivery of education and training. Athabasca: University of Athabasca Press.Google Scholar
  54. Traxler, J. (2009). Learning in a mobile age. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. UNESCO. (2011). UNESCO mobile learning week report. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/ED/ICT/pdf/UNESCO%20MLW%20report%20final%2019jan.pdf.
  56. Van Der Heijden, K. (2005). Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  57. Van Gunsteren, H. R. (1976). The quest for control exemplar scenarios from science, engineering and maths. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  58. Wang, M., & Shen, R. (2012). Message design for mobile learning: Learning theories, human cognition and design principles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 561–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilson, R., Goodman, J., Bradbury, L., & Gross, L. (2013). Exploring the use of iPads to investigate forces and motion in an elementary science methods course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol13/iss2/science/article1.cfm.
  60. Wong, L. H., & Looi, C. K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2364–2381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang, B. H., Looi, C. K., Seow, P., Chia, G., Wong, L. H., Chen, W., et al. (2010). Deconstructing and reconstructing: Transforming primary science learning via a mobilized curriculum. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1504–1523.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zimmerman, H. T., & Land, S. M. (2014). Facilitating place-based learning in outdoor informal environments with mobile computers. TechTrends, 58(1), 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandy Schuck
    • 1
    Email author
  • Peter Aubusson
    • 1
  • Kevin Burden
    • 2
  • Sue Brindley
    • 3
  1. 1.STEM Education Futures Research CentreUniversity of Technology SydneyBroadwayAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Arts, Culture and EducationUniversity of HullYorkshireUK
  3. 3.Faculty of EducationUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations