Advertisement

Steps Taken by NGOs and the Private Sector to Improve Quality of Care

  • Jay Satia
  • Kavita Chauhan
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss NGO-led interventions for demand creation/enhancing demand for quality of care, service delivery, and reaching young people. The private sector has two major operational modalities: social franchising and social marketing. Although many steps have been taken to improve quality of care through quality assurance in both these modalities, continuous QI is needed. We have hardly any information on quality of care in the private sector outside these two modalities.

Keywords

Demand creation Young people Social marketing Social franchising 

References

  1. Abt Associates. (2007). Using partnerships to expand the use of injectable contraceptives: The Dimpa networkhttp://www.abtassoc.net/presentations/DimpaNetworkASinha.pdf. Accessed on December 7, 2017.
  2. Ashcroft, C. N. (2016). The linkages between fertility awareness and family planning uptake: Program findings of scaling mHealth services in India. Presentation made at the International Conference on Family Planning, Panel 99.Google Scholar
  3. Bishnoi, S. (2015). Addressing needs of young people: Empowerment through life skills education and counselling. In J. Satia, K. Chauhan, A. Bhattacharya, & N. Mishra (Eds.), Innovations in family planning: Case studies from India (pp. 221–239). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  4. FHI360. (2013). Improving access to family planning: End of project meeting. https://www.fhi360.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/fhi360-global-approach-family-planning-finger.pdf. Accessed on December 7, 2017.
  5. Iyengar, K., & Sharad, D. I. (2000). The Copper-T 380A IUD: A ten-year alternative to female sterilisation in India. Reproductive Health Matters, 8(16), 125–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(00)90194-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kumar, D. (2016). Capacity building in no-scalpel vasectomy leads to greater contraceptive choice in Uttar Pradesh and Jharkhand, India. In International Conference on Family Planning, Panel 1536.Google Scholar
  7. Leisher, S. H., Sprockett, A., Longfield, K., & Montagu, D. (Eds.). (2016, October). Quality measurement in family planning: Past, present, future. Papers from the Bellagio Meeting on Family Planning Quality. Metrics for Management, Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
  8. Madhavan, S., & Bishai, D. (2010). Private sector engagement in sexual and reproductive health and maternal and neonatal health a review of the evidence. Baltimore: Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.Google Scholar
  9. Methur D, Pandya B. (2016). Role of helpline outbound calling in reduction of dissatisfaction and discontinuation rate among IUD clients. Plesented at the International Conference on Family Planning (ICFP). http://www.psi.org/icfp-2016/ Accessed on 7 July 2017.
  10. Mwaikambo, L., Speizer, I. S., Schurmann, A., Morgan, G., & Fikree, F. (2011). What works in family planning interventions: A systematic review. Studies in Family Planning, 42(2), 67–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Ominde, A. (2016). A matter of rights, choice, and quality: Effective quality of care interventions in family planning programs. In International Conference on Family Planning, Panel 199.Google Scholar
  12. OPM (Oxford Policy Management). (2015). Impact evaluation of project Ujjwal. http://www.opml.co.uk/sites/default/files/Impact_Evaluation_of_Project_Ujjwal.pdf. Accessed on December 7, 2017
  13. PSS (2003). Report of Odisha urban reproductive health project. Parivar Seva SansthanGoogle Scholar
  14. Scott, B., Alam, D., & Raman, S. (2011). Factors affecting acceptance of vasectomy in Uttar Pradesh: Insights from community-based, participatory qualitative research. The RESPOND Project Study Series, Contributions to global knowledge—Report no. 3. New York: EngenderHealth/The RESPOND Project.Google Scholar
  15. Sharma, V., Sagar, M., & Singh, A. (2013). Evaluation of Dimpa injectable contraceptive network in India. Strengthening Health Outcomes through the Private Sector (SHOPS). USA: Abt Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Stephenson, R., Tsui, A. O., Sulzbach, S., Bardsley, P., Bekele, G., Giday, T., et al. (2004). Franchising reproductive health services. Health Services Research, 39(6, part 2), 2053–2080.Google Scholar
  17. USAID (United States Agency for International Development). (2005). Systematic screening to integrate reproductive health services in India.Google Scholar
  18. Visaria, L. (1999). The quality of reproductive health care in Gujarat: Perspectives of female health workers and their clients. In M. A. Koenig & M. E. Khan (Eds.), Improving quality of care in India’s family welfare programme (pp. 143–168). New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  19. Viswanathan, R., & Seefeld, C. A. (2015). Clinical social franchising compendium. An annual survey of programs: Findings from 2014. San Francisco: Global Health Group, Global Health Sciences, University of California.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Public Health GandhinagarGandhinagarIndia
  2. 2.Public Health Foundation of IndiaGurgaonIndia

Personalised recommendations