Perspectives of Vegetation Ecology and Biodiversity for Management of Ravine Lands

  • Jagdish Chander Dagar


Importance of vegetation ecology in the abatement of soil erosion and thereby in stabilizing the gullies and ravines has been well known and widely advocated. The indigenous woody vegetation and perennial grasses are considered generally more effective in halting runoff and erosion than cultivated crops and exotics. The native species have adapted themselves against all edaphic and biotic pressure and have capacity to regenerate along eroded slopes. The phytoclimate of the watersheds of rivers having ravines indicates to be therophytic showing biotic pressure of over-exploitation and overgrazing. But at the same time, there are quite a good number of phanerophytes showing that the watershed areas favour the luxuriant growth of both phanerophytes and therophytes provided the over-exploitation of woody vegetation and overgrazing are stopped. Successional trend also indicates that the ravine lands are facing tremendous biotic pressure and the vegetation is a biotic climax. After closing to grazing, it will lead to dry deciduous or savannah forest which consequently will offer more effective check against erosion. Along with herbage cover, the underground parts mainly thin roots also play an important role in retaining the soil and moisture, infiltration of nutrient cycling and ameliorating the soil. This all depends upon the configuration, density and the strength of the root system. The extent of root systems and their soil-binding capacity vary from plant to plant. Therefore, the ecological studies of vegetation including root systems help in understanding the role of different species and plant communities in conserving the soil in watershed areas including ravines and consequently silting of reservoirs, canals, streams and rivers. In the present chapter, an attempt has been made to explore the ecological perspectives of vegetation and terrestrial biodiversity in controlling the ravine formation by stabilizing the soil and protecting the biodiversity for its potential and sustainable use for livelihood and environmental security.


  1. Abraham R (2011) Puntius fascicatus. In: IUCN Red list of threatened species, version 2011.2.
  2. Ambasht RS (1968) Ecology of river bank. Proc Symp Rec Adv Trop Ecol Varanasi 1:466–470Google Scholar
  3. Ambasht RS, Shankar M (1993) Rehabilitation of degraded river corridors. In: Singh JS (ed) Restoration of degraded lands: concepts and strategies. Rastogi Publications, Meerut, pp 191–209Google Scholar
  4. Ambasht RS, Shardendu, Srivastava AK, Shankar M, Sinha M (1988) Plant population, community structure and function of riparian and aquatic macrophytes in relation to pollution of river Ganga. Technical Report, DoEn- Ganga Project P-739 (A), pp 139Google Scholar
  5. Anwar C, Baheramsyah K, Hamzah Z (1989) Effectiveness of shrubs and agroforestr in Kadipaten village (Indonesia, upper Citanduy sub-watershed) in trimming runoff and erosion. Bull Penelitian Hutan 511:1–8Google Scholar
  6. Baets D, Poesen J, Knapen A, Barbera GG, Navarro JA (2007) Root characteristics of representative Mediterranean plant species and their erosion-reducing potential during concentrated runoff. Plant Soil 294(1):169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhimaya CP, Rege ND, Srinivasan S (1956) Preliminary studies on the role of grasses in soil conservation in the Nilgiris. J Soil and Water Cons India 4:113–117Google Scholar
  8. Bokhari UG, Singh JS (1974) Effects of temperature and clipping on growth, carbohydrate reserves and root exudation of western wheat grass in hydrophonic culture. Crp Sci 14:790–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bor NL (1960) Grasses of Burma, Ceylon, India and Pakistan. Pergamon Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Caughenour MB, McNaughton SJ, Wallace LL (1984) Simulation study of East African perennial graminoid responses in defoliation. Ecol Model 26:177–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Champion HG, Seth SK (1968) A revised survey of the forest types of India. Manager of Publications, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  12. Chandra K, Gajbe PU (2005) An inventory of Herpetofauna of Madhya Pradesh and Chhttisgarh. Zoo’s Print J 20(3):1812–1819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaturvedi OP, Kaushal R, Tomar JMS, Prandiyal AK, Panwar P (2014) Agroforestry for wasteland rehabilitation: mined, ravine, and degraded wasteland areas. In: Dagar JC, Singh AK, Arunachalam A (eds) Agroforestry systems in India: livelihood security and ecosystem services, advances in agroforestry, vol 10. Springer, New Delhi, pp 233–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chinnamani S (1992) Silvipasture and natural grasslands of Mahi ravines and ravines of Gujarat. J Range Manag Agroforest 13:175–181Google Scholar
  15. Chinnamani S (1998) Ecology of succession of Prosopis Juliflora in the ravines of India. In: Tewari JC, Pasiecznik NM, Harsh LN, PJC H (eds) Prosopis species in the arid and semiarid zones of India. The Prosopis Society of India & the Henry Doubleday research association. CAZRI, JodhpurGoogle Scholar
  16. Dagar JC (1978) Studies on soil erosion of Kshipra ravines. Ph D Thesis, Vikram University, Ujjain, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  17. Dagar JC (1986) Studies on root systems of some grasses growing in Kshipra ravines. J Indian Bot Soc 65(4):397–403Google Scholar
  18. Dagar JC (1987a) Species composition and plant biomass of an ungrazed and a grazed grassland at Ujjain, India. Trop Ecol 28:208–215Google Scholar
  19. Dagar JC (1987b) Responses of clipping treatments on nine palatable perennial grasses. Trop Ecol 28:216–221Google Scholar
  20. Dagar JC (1987c) Studies on reclamation of Kshipra ravines. Indian J For 10(2):83–89Google Scholar
  21. Dagar JC (1987d) Studies on root systems of some woody species growing in Kshipra ravines. Indian J Appl Pure Biol 2(1):17–21Google Scholar
  22. Dagar JC (1989) Studies on root systems of some forbs growing in Kshipra ravines. Indian J Appl Pure Biol 4(1):35–47Google Scholar
  23. Dagar JC (1995) Soil conservation values of some grasses and forbs. Proc Indian Nat Sci Acad B 61:163–170Google Scholar
  24. Dagar JC (2001) Biological spectrum and successional trends in Kshipra watershed areas. Indian J For 24(3):351–356Google Scholar
  25. Dagar JC (2012) Utilization of degraded lands / habitats and poor-quality water for livelihood security and mitigating climate change. Indian J Agroforetsry 14(1):1–16Google Scholar
  26. Dagar JC (2017) Potentials for fodder production in degraded lands. In: Ghosh PK, Mohanta SK, Singh JB, Vijay D, Kumar RV, Yadav VK, Sunil K (eds) Approaches towards fodder security in India. Studera Press, New Delhi, pp 333–364Google Scholar
  27. Dagar JC, Arunachalam A (2013) Management of degraded ecologies for mitigating climate change. In: Arunachalam A, Dagar JC, Singh AK (eds) Agroforestry and climate change management. Pointer Publications, Jaipur, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  28. Dagar JC, Balakrishnan NP (1984) Life forms and biological spectrum of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Bull Bot Surv India 26(3&4):147–159Google Scholar
  29. Dagar JC, Gupta SR (2016) Agroforestry: potentials for rehabilitation of degraded lands, constraints and the way forward. In: Dagar JC, Tewari JC (eds) Agroforestry research developments. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 46–97. (ISBN: 978-1-63485-046-9)Google Scholar
  30. Dagar JC, Mall LP (1980) Studies on the vegetation of ravines and banks of the river Kshipra and its tributaries. J Indian Bot Soc 59:234–245Google Scholar
  31. Dagar JC, Pathak PS (2005) Grassland dynamics and their management. Range Manag Agroforestry 26(1):7–31Google Scholar
  32. Dagar JC, Singh VP (1980) The ecological studies of the vegetation of river Kshipra and its tributaries. Biologia 25:43–62Google Scholar
  33. Dagar JC, Singh NT (1999) Plant resources of Andaman & Nicobar Islands. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh Publishers, Dehra Dun, India. p. 985Google Scholar
  34. Dagar JC, Singh G (2003) Pasture production in degraded and problematic soils- status and prospects. In: Jakhmola RC, Jain RK (eds) Sustainable animal production. Pointer Publishers, Jaipur, pp 94–119Google Scholar
  35. Dagar JC, Singh VP, Mall LP (1978) Regeneration in plants growing on eroded soil. Ann Arid Zone 17:68–74Google Scholar
  36. Daily GC, Alexander S, Ehrlich PR, Goulder L, Lubchenco J, Matson PA, Mooney HA, Postel S, Schneider SH, Tilman D, Woodwell GM (1997) Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Issues Ecol 1(2):1–18Google Scholar
  37. De Kroon H, Visser EJW (eds) (2003) Root ecology. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  38. Edroma EL (1985) Effect of clipping on Themeda Triandra and Brachiaria platynotan in Queen Elizabeth National Park, Uganda. Afr J Ecol 23:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Evans GC (1972) The quantitative analysis of plant growth. Univ Calif Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  40. Gallart F, Marignani M, Perez-Gallego N, Santi E, Maccherini S (2012) Thirty years of studies on badlands, from physical to vegetational approaches-a succinct review. Catena 106:4–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gray DH, Barker D (2004) Root-soil mechanics and interaction. In: Bennett SJ, Simon A (eds) Riparian vegetation and fluvial geomorphology-water science and application series 8. American Geophysical union, Washington, DC, pp 113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gupta RK (1961) Vegetation in catchment areas of river ganga and Yamuna with reference to their soil and water conservation problems. J Indian Bot Soc 40:325–334Google Scholar
  43. IUCN (1998) 1997 IUCN red list of threatened species. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, GlandGoogle Scholar
  44. IUCN (2011) IUCN Red list of threatened species, version 2011.2.
  45. Kumar R, Shankar M, Ambasht RS (1990) Water, soil and nutrient movement from riparian and Obra-Renukoot-Singrauti area and its impact on natural and derived ecosystems. Tech report. Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, pp 285–304Google Scholar
  46. Luken JO (1990) Directing ecological succession. Chapman and Hall, New York. ISBN 0-412-34450-5Google Scholar
  47. Meher-Homji VM (1964) Life form and biological spectra as ephamonic criteria of aridity and humidity in the tropics. J Indian Bot Soc 43:424–430Google Scholar
  48. Misra R (1944) The vegetation of Raighat ravines. J Indian Bot Soc 23:113–121Google Scholar
  49. Misra R (1962) The science of vegetation with reference to India. Bull Bot Survey India 4:113–118Google Scholar
  50. Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Murthy MS (1971) Ecology of upper catchment area of river Narmada-Climo-vegetational relationships. Japanese J Ecol 21:188–192Google Scholar
  52. Nair T, Chitanya-Krishna Y (2013) Vertebrate fauna of the Chambal river basin, with emphasis on the National Chambal Sanctuary, India. J Threat Tax 5(2):3620–3641. Scholar
  53. Oldeman LR (1994) The global extent of soil degradation. In: Greenland DJ, Szabolcs I (eds) Soil resilience and sustainable land use. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 99–118Google Scholar
  54. Pande H, Singh JS (1985) Influence of clipping and water stress on growth performance and nutrient value of four range grasses. Proc Indian Acad Sci (Plant Sc) 95:389–403Google Scholar
  55. Pandeya SC, Pandya SM, Murthy MS (1972) Ecology of river Narmada upper catchment in Central India. I. Introduction, situation, terrain, lithology, climate, general forests and methods of vegetational analysis. J Indian Bot Soc 51:356–373Google Scholar
  56. Pathak PS, Dagar JC (2015) Indian grasslands and their management. In: Ghosh PK, Mahanta SK, Singh JB, Pathak PS (eds) Grassland: a global resource perspective. Range Management Society of India, Jhansi, pp 3–36Google Scholar
  57. Pimentel D, Kounang N (1998) Ecology of soil erosion in ecosystems. Ecosystems 1(5):416–426. Scholar
  58. Prajapati MC, Nambiar KTN, Puri DN, Singh JP, Malhotra BM (1993) Fuel and fodder production in Yamuna ravines at Agra. Indian J Soil Cons 21(3):8–13Google Scholar
  59. Puri GS, Meher-Homji VM, Gupta RK, Puri S (1983) Forest ecology, 2nd ed Vol I: phytogeography and forest conservation. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co, New Delhi, p 549Google Scholar
  60. Ranade DH, Mishra VK, Gupta RK, Verma SK (2002) Root distribution pattern of some grass species in black clay soil in relation to their capability for controlling erosion. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 50(3):280–282Google Scholar
  61. Rao CC (1965) Ecological studies on a piece of watershed land. Trp Ecol 6:124–132Google Scholar
  62. Rao CC (1969) Phytosociological studies on a piece of watershed land in the vicinity of rivers Karamnasa and Chandraprabha (Varanasi district). Ph D Thesis Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  63. Raunkiaer C (1934) The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography-being the collected papers of C Raunkiaer. (Translated into English by Carter HG, Tansley AG, Fausboll) Oxford Clarendon Press, pp 632Google Scholar
  64. Reubens B, Poesen J, Danjon F, Geudens G, Muys B (2007) The role of fine and coarse roots in shallow slope stability and soil erosion control with a focus on root system architecture: a review. Trees 21(4):385–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Saxena SK (1977) Vegetation and its succession in the Indian desert. In: Desertification and its control. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp 176–192Google Scholar
  66. SER (2004) The SER Primer on Ecological Restoration, Version 2. Society for Ecological Restoration (SER), Science and Policy Working Group.
  67. Shah GL (1969) A contribution to the flora of Mahi ravines in Central Gujarat. Indian For 95(4):270–277Google Scholar
  68. Shankar V, Kanodia KC, Dabadghao PM (1971) Studies on plant succession in Sehima-Dichanthium grass cover. Ann Arid Zone 10:158–164Google Scholar
  69. Shields FD, Gray DH (1993) Effects of woody vegetation on the structural integrity of sandy levees. Water Res Bull 28:917–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Singh VP, Dagar JC, Uppadhyaya SD (1979) Analysis of structure, production dynamics and successional trends of tropical grassland communities of Ujjain (India). Sylvatrop-Philip For Res Journ 4:231–254Google Scholar
  71. Somasundaram J, Singh RK, Parandiyal AK, Prasad SN (2009) Micronutrient status of soils under different land use systems in Chambal ravines. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 57(3):307–312Google Scholar
  72. Stocking MA (1984) Erosion and soil productivity: a review. FAO Consultant working paper No. 1. Soil Conservation Program, Land and Water Development Division, FAO, rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  73. Taylor HM (1976) The effect of soil compaction on rooting pattern and water uptake of cotton. Paper in 7th Conference. Soil Intnl Soil Till. Res Org SwedonGoogle Scholar
  74. Tejwani KG, Gupta SK, Mathur HN (eds) (1975) Soil and water conservation research (1956–1971). ICAR Pub, New Delhi, p 358Google Scholar
  75. Thomas M, Sahu P, Shrivastava A, Hussain Z (2011) Biodiversity and livelihood options of people in Chambal ravine of Morena district, Madhya Pradesh, India. J Trop For 27(July–Sept, 2011):40–56Google Scholar
  76. Vanicek V (1973) The soil protective role of specially shaped plant roots. Biol Conserv 5:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Verma B, Chinnamani S (1990) Rehabilitation of ravine lands. In: Abrol IP, Dhuruva Narayana VV (eds) Technologies for wasteland development. ICAR, New Delhi, pp 263–272Google Scholar
  78. Verma SK, Singh A (2015) Chambal ravines, perspectives of formations and management options. In: Verma SK, Trivedi SK, Singh A, Tomar AS (eds) Management of degraded lands and soil health. Biotech Books, New Delhi, pp 31–46Google Scholar
  79. Verma SK, Trivedi SK, Singh A, Tomar AS (eds) (2015) Management of degraded lands and soil health. Biotech Books, New Delhi, p 249Google Scholar
  80. Wadia DM (1961) Geology of India. The English Language Book Soc, and Mc Millan & Co Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  81. Wilson EO (1988) Biodiversity. National Academy, Washington, DC. ISBN 0-309-03739-5Google Scholar
  82. Yadava PS, Singh JS (1977) Progress in ecology vol 2: grassland vegetation. Today and Tomorrow’s Print and Publ, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  83. Young A (1989) Agroforestry for soil conservation. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jagdish Chander Dagar
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Council of Agricultural SciencesPusaIndia

Personalised recommendations