Mobilizing Concealment and Spectacle Among Uruguay’s Waste-Pickers

Chapter
Part of the Work, Organization, and Employment book series (WOAE)

Abstract

This chapter centers on the labor organization of waste-pickers (clasificadores) in Montevideo, Uruguay. It compares the organizational strategies of the waste-picker trade union with those of clasificadores working in landfills, and in formal sector recycling plants. While the trade union relies on spectacular protest in an effort to leverage concessions from the municipal government, it is shown that such methods are inappropriate for those at the landfill who instead rely on the concealment of their clandestine labor, and the development of affective bonds with municipal workers. Those working in formal sector recycling plants, meanwhile, are able both to make use of their newly found visibility and to use traditional avenues of workers’ struggle, such as taking strike-action and foot-dragging. Rather than being powerless, a range of ‘weapons of the weak’ are thus shown to be available to waste-pickers. Instead of being individualistic, clasificadores at different sites and scales use these to achieve and defend access to waste and thus livelihoods for various collectives, from cooperative to kinship groups.

Keyword

Labor organizing Waste-picking Recycling Concealment Spectacle 

References

  1. Adissi, G. (2004). El fenómeno “cartonero” en los medios gráficos porteños—La construcción de un nuevo sujeto/objeto histórico. Fichero de Casos, 1–12.Google Scholar
  2. Aguiar, L. L. M. (2016). Sweatshop citizenship, precariousness and organizing building cleaners. In R. Lambert & A. Herod (Eds.), Neoliberal capitalism and precarious work: Ethnographies of accommodation and resistance. Cheltenham: Edward Edgar.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections of the origins and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Atzeni, M. (2016). Beyond trade unions’ strategy? The social construction of precarious workers organizing in the city of Buenos Aires. Labor History, 57(2), 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aynsley, A. (producer) & Walker, L. (director). (2010). Wasteland. Brazil: 02 Filmes.Google Scholar
  6. Benassi, C., & Vlandas, T. (2016). Union inclusiveness and temporary agency workers: The role of power resources and union ideology. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 22(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benjamin, W. (1999). The arcades project (H. Eiland & K. McLaughlin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Birbeck, C. (1978). Self-employed Proletarians in an informal factory: The case of Cali’s garbage dump. World Development, 6(9–10), 1173–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boo, K. (2013). Behind the beautiful forevers: Life, death and hope in a Mumbai slum. London: Portobello Books.Google Scholar
  10. Breman, J. (2013). A Bogus concept? New Left Review, November–December 2013.Google Scholar
  11. Carenzo, S. & Miguez, P. (2010). De la atomización al asociativismo: Reflexiones en torno a los sentidos de la autogestión en experiencias asociativas desarrolladas por cartoneros/as. Maguare (24). Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
  12. Carrasco, S. (Muñoz, D.). (1883). La Basura. “La Razón” de Montevideo Agosto, 1 de 1883.Google Scholar
  13. Chikarmane, P. (2014). Informal economy monitoring study: Waste pickers in Pune, India. Manchester, UK: WIEGO.Google Scholar
  14. Debord, G. (2002 [1964]). The society of the spectacle (K. Ken Trans.). Canberra: Hobgoblin Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dinerstein, A. C. (2013). From corporatist to autonomous: Unemployed workers’ organisations and the remaking of labour subjectivity in Argentina. In J. Howell (Ed.), Non-governmental public action and social justice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elizalde, L., Fry, M., Musto, L., Sanguinetti, M., Sarachu, G., & Texeira, F. (2012). Clasificadores/as de residuos urbanos sólidos en Montevideo: condocionamientos, posibilidades y tentativas de organización. Contrapunto 1: December 2012.Google Scholar
  17. Fernandez, L. (2010). El encuentro fortuito entre la Nariz del Rey y los Espacios de Mal Olor. Harto Mapeo. Revista de la Facultad de Architectura en Montevideo.Google Scholar
  18. Fernandez, L. (2012). Paisajes-basura: Dinámicas y Externalidades Territoriales del Reciclaje en Montevideo—Uruguay. Documento de Trabajo de WIEGO (Políticas Urbanas) (25) Julio de 2012.Google Scholar
  19. Goldstein, D. (2004). The spectacular city: Violence and performance in urban Bolivia. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grimson, A. (2008). The making of new urban borders: Neoliberalism and protest in Buenos Aires. Antipodes, 40(4), 504–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Handelman, D. (1997). Rituals/spectacles. International Social Science Journal, 49(153), 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harvey, D. (1995). Militant particularism and global ambition: The conceptual politics of place, space, and environment in the work of Raymond Williams. Social Text, 42 (Spring, 1995), 69–98.Google Scholar
  23. Intendencia de Montevideo (IM). (2015). Trayectos Montevideanos: Inclusión social de hombres y mujeres clasificadores 2010–2015. Montevideo: IM.Google Scholar
  24. Intendencia de Montevideo (IM), PNUD & PNUMA. (2012). Caracterización de la población de clasificadores de residuos de Montevideo. Montevideo.Google Scholar
  25. Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lebowitz, M. A. (2006). Build it now: Socialism for the twenty-first century. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  27. Leigh Star, S. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioural Scientist, 43(3), 377–391, November/December 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lenin, V. I. (1990 [1902]). What is to be done? London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  29. LKSUR Asociados. (2004). Plan Director de Residuos Sólidos de Montevideo y Área Metropolitana, Anexo Residuos Sólidos.Google Scholar
  30. Lopez Reilly, A. (2017). IMM impide con policías ingreso de hurgadores a Felipe Cardoso. Feb 14th, 2016. El País. Available at http://www.elpais.com.uy/informacion/imm-impide-policias-ingreso-hurgadores.html. Accessed March 16, 2017.
  31. Meoni, J (coord.). (2014). Una Red de Encuentros, Un Proyecto en construcción. Montevideo: Red Latinoamericano de Recicladores (REDLACRE).Google Scholar
  32. Millar, K. (2014). The precarious present: Wageless labor and disrupted life in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cultural Anthropology, 29(1), 32–53, (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Munck, R. (2013). The precariat: A view from the South’. Third World Quarterly, 34(5), 747–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neilson, B., & Rossiter, N. (2008). Precarity as a political concept, or, Fordism as exception. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Hare, P. (2017). The Uruguayan recyclers’ union: Clasificadores, circulation, and the challenge of mobile labor organizations. In T. Ngwane, I. Ness, & L. Sinwell (Eds.), Urban revolt: State power and the rise of people’s movements in the global south. New York: Haymarket. Forthcoming (2017).Google Scholar
  36. Padilha, J. (Producer) & Prado, M. (Director). (2005). Estamira. Brazil.Google Scholar
  37. Plan Uruguay Clasifica (PUC). (2006). Tirando del carro. Montevideo: MIDES.Google Scholar
  38. Plan Uruguay Clasifica (PUC). (2008). Clasificar para incluir, incluir para reciclar. Montevideo: MIDES.Google Scholar
  39. Programa de Naciones Unidas de Desarrollo (PNUD) & Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente (PNUMA). (2012). Implementación de la Ley de Envases”: Informe de evaluación. PNUD/PNUMA: Montevideo.Google Scholar
  40. Ras, N. (1996). El Gaucho y la Ley. Montevideo: Carlos Marchesi.Google Scholar
  41. Rosaldo, M. (2016). Revolution in the garbage dump: The political and economic foundations of the Colombian recycler movement, 1986–2011. Social Problems, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ross, A. (2008). The new geography of work. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Samson, M. (Ed.). (2009). Refusing to be cast aside: Waste pickers organising around the world. Cambridge, MA: WIEGO.Google Scholar
  44. Samson, M. (2015). Forging a new conceptualization of “The Public” in waste management. WIEGO Working Paper (32).Google Scholar
  45. Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Silverman, J. (2011). Labor Relations in Uruguay under the Frente Amplio Government, 2005–2009: From Neoliberalism to Neocorporativism? In Paper presented at the VII Global Labour University Conference 2011, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
  47. Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  48. Standing, G. (2014). A precariat charter: From denizens to citizens. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  49. Sternberg, C. A. (2013). From “cartoneros” to “recolectores urbanos”. The changing rhetoric and urban waste management policies in neoliberal Buenos Aires. Geoforum 48, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thoburn, N. (2002). Difference in Marx: The lumpenproletariat and the proletariat unnameable. Economy and Society, 31(3), 434–460, August 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Williams, R. (1989). Resources of hope. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  52. Yun, A. (2016). Organizing across a fragmented labor force: Trade union responses to precarious work in Korean auto companies. In R. Lambert & A. Herod (Eds.), Neoliberal capitalism and precarious work: Ethnographies of accommodation and resistance. Cheltenham: Edward Edgar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations