Enhanced Parallel Image Retrieval Technique Using Relevance Feedback

  • M. Sridevi
  • Vishnu Balakrishnan
  • Janardhan J. Kammath
  • Sherine Davis
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 710)

Abstract

The retrieval of relevant images to a given query is a challenging problem. Many researchers have proposed solutions to solve this problem. The idea of ‘Human in Loop’ adds more useful data to the existing data, which can help refine the output of content-based image retrieval (CBIR) system. In this paper, we extend on ‘Human in Loop’ by setting up a relevance feedback system. It helps the CBIR system to understand closer similarities between images which mere feature vectors and algorithms can’t identify. This paper aims at improving the performance and efficiency of a CBIR system by using Bitmaps to show relevance among the vast number of images, for which feature vectors have already been extracted and stored, and parallel indexing and comparison process are performed to reduce computation time. Use of Bitmap helps learn the feedback obtained from multiple users regarding the relevance between various images until a saturation point is reached. The results show its superiority in comparison with existing models such as QBIC, MARS and VIPER techniques.

Keywords

CBIR Colour moments Bitmaps Parallelization Image retrieval 

References

  1. 1.
    Vadhri Suryanarayana, Dr. M. V.L.N. Raja Rao et al (2012) “Image retrieval system using hybrid feature extraction technique”, IJCSIT Vol 04 No 1 Page No.:2–8Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Swapnil Saurav, Prajakta Belsare et al (2015) “Holistic Correlation of colour models, colour features and distance metrics on CBIR”, IRJET Vol 02 Issue 07Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amit Singla, Meenakshi Garg (2014) “QBIC, MARS and VIPER: A review on Content Based Image Retrieval Techniques”, IJECS Vol 03, Issue 08 Page No.: 7680–7684, Page No.: 3Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davar Giveki, Hadis Tarrah et al (2015) “A New Content Based Image Retrieval Model Based on Wavelet Transform”, Journal of Computer and Communications 3 Page No.: 66–73Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shih-Fu Chang et al (1999) “Image retrieval: Current Techniques, Promising Directions and Open Issues”, Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, Page No.: 2, 9Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Michael Ortega-Binderberger et al (2004) “Relevance Feedback Techniques in the MARS image retrieval system”, Springer Multimedia Systems Vol 09 Issue 06 Page No.: 535–547Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.S. Gode, Apurva N. Ganar (2014) “Enhancement of Image Retrieval by Using Colour, Texture and Shape Features”, Electronic Systems, Signal Processing and Computing Technologies (ICESC), International ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lijun Ding, Ardeshir Goshtasby (2001) “Pattern Recognition”, Vol 34 Issue 03 Page No.: 721–725Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R Jain, R Kasturi and B G Schunck (1995) “Machine Vision”, Binary Image Processing, McGraw–Hill, Page No.: 169–173Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E Trucco and A Verri (1998) “Introductory Techniques for 3D Computer Vision”, Prentice Hall Page No.: 71–79Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sunil Kopparapu and M Satish (2014) “Optimal Gaussian Filter for Effective Noise Filtering”, TENCON 2014–2015 IEEE Region 10 Conference, Page No.: 3Google Scholar
  12. 12.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Sridevi
    • 1
  • Vishnu Balakrishnan
    • 1
  • Janardhan J. Kammath
    • 1
  • Sherine Davis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyTiruchirappalliIndia

Personalised recommendations