The Lazy Element: LMF and the Localization of Hip Hop Authenticity

  • Michael Ka Chi Cheuk


No other cultural practitioner values authenticity, or “keeping it real,” more than rappers and hip hop musicians. Debates regarding what “real” hip hop is, however, remain contentious. This chapter examines how the Hong Kong hip hop group LazyMuthaFucka (LMF) localizes hip hop authenticity. Deviating from existing studies which label LMF as “conscious rap” or “gangsta rap,” the study introduces the notion of the “Lazy element” to reveal LMF’s artistic vision as one that is too “Lazy” to conform to any artistic conventions or categories. The examination focuses on how the group manifests the Lazy element in both its musical and lyrical aesthetics. This chapter concludes that LMF’s Lazy element represents the localization of the fluidity of hip hop authenticity in the Hong Kong context.


Hip hop Localization Authenticity Identity LMF 


  1. Abbas, Ackbar. Hong Kong: Culture and the Politics of Disappearance. Minneapolis: Minnesota UP, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. Brubaker, Roger, and Frederick Cooper. “Beyond Identity.” Theory and Society 29.1 (2000): 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chan, Ka-yan. “Exploring Youth Subculture in Hong Kong: A Case Study on the Local Band LazyMuthaFucka (LMF).” MPhil thesis., Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2002.Google Scholar
  4. Chan, Koon-chung. “Hong Kong as Method,” In Chu, Hong Kong Studies as Method. Chung Wah Book Company: Hong Kong, 2016. 129–39.Google Scholar
  5. Chang, Jeff. “Making a Name: How DJ Kool Herc Lost His Accent And Started Hip-Hop.” Can’t Stop Won’t Stop. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2005. 67–88.Google Scholar
  6. Charry, Eric. “Music for an African Twenty-First Century.” In Hip Hop Africa: New African Music in a Globalizing World. Ed. Eric Charry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2012. 283–316.Google Scholar
  7. Chu, Yiu-wai. Hong Kong Popular Lyrics Studies: From the Mid-1970s to the Mid-1990s. Hong Kong: Joint Publishing, 1998.Google Scholar
  8. ———. “Localness/Syncreticism: Preface.” In Chu, Hong Kong Studies as Method, 229–36.Google Scholar
  9. ———. “The Importance of Being Free: Fu©Kin Music as Alternative Pop Music Production.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 12.1 (2011): 62–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———., ed. Hong Kong Studies as Method. Chung Hwa Book Company: Hong Kong, 2016.Google Scholar
  11. Chuck D (Carlton Douglas Ridenhour). “Gangs.” Fight the Power: Rap, Race and Reality with Yusuf Jah. New York: Delacorte Press, 1997. 240–62.Google Scholar
  12. Gilroy, Paul. “It’s a Family Affair.” That’s the Joint!: The Hip Hop Studies Reader. Ed. Murray Forman and Mark Anthony Neal. New York: Routledge, 2004. 87–94.Google Scholar
  13. Hoch, Danny. “Towards A Hip Hop Aesthetic: A Manifesto.” Total Chaos: The Art and Aesthetics of Hip Hop. Ed. Jeff Chang. Cambridge, MA: Basic Civitas Books, 2006. 349–63.Google Scholar
  14. Iandoli, Kathy. “The Rise of ‘Mumble Rap’: Did Lyricism Take a Hit in 2016?” Billboards. com. December 21, 2016. Accessed September 23, 2017.
  15. Jarman-Ivens, Freya. Oh Boy! Masculinities and Popular Music. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
  16. Jeffries, Michael. Thug Life: Race, Gender, and the Meaning of Hip-Hop. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lin, Angel. “‘Respect for da Chopstick Hip Hop’: The Politics, Poetics, and Pedagogy of Cantonese Verbal Art in Hong Kong.” Global Linguistic Flows: Hip Hop Cultures, Youth Identities, and the Politics of Language. Ed. H. Samy Alim, Awad Ibrahim, and Alastair Pennycook. New York: Routledge, 2008. 159–78.Google Scholar
  18. Ma, Eric. “Emotional Energy and Sub-Cultural Politics: Alternative Bands in Post-1997 Hong Kong.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 3.2 (2002): 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mak, Tim. “Why Won’t Hong Kong Get Down With Hip-Hop?” October 6, 2014. Accessed September 23, 2017 from
  20. McLeod, Kembrew. “Authenticity Within Hip-Hop and Other Cultures Threatened with Assimilation.” Journal of Communication 49.4 (1999): 134–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mitchell, Tony. Global Noise: Rap and Hip Hop Outside the USA. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan UP, 2001.Google Scholar
  22. Ng, Chun-hung, Cheung Chi-wai, and Tsang Chung-kin. Pop Hong Kong: Reading Hong Kong Popular Culture: 2000–2010. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Educational Publishing Company, 2012.Google Scholar
  23. Ng, Wincy, et al. Selling LMF. Hong Kong: Ming Pao, 2001.Google Scholar
  24. Norfleet, Dawn M. “Hip Hop and Rap.” African American Music: An Introduction. Ed. Mellonee V. Burnim and Portia K Maultsby. New York: Routledge, 2006. 355–90.Google Scholar
  25. Pennycook, Alastair. “Language, Localization, and the Real: Hip-Hop and the Global Spread of Authenticity.” Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 6.2 (2008): 101–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rose, Tricia. “Introduction.” The Hip Hop Wars: What We Talk About When We Talk About Hip Hop–and Why It Matters. New York: Basic Civitas Books, 2008. 1–30.Google Scholar
  27. RZA (Robert Fitzgerald Diggs). The Wu-Tang Manual. New York: Penguin Books, 2005.Google Scholar
  28. Samuels, David. “The Rap on Rap.” That’s the Joint!: The Hip Hop Studies Reader. Ed. Murray Forman and Mark Anthony Neal. New York: Routledge, 2004. 147–53.Google Scholar
  29. Wong, Lin-lin. “Heping shoushi bi ren zuo dao lan. Fan V shiwei. Beyond ming cun ting feng: Sha ren xian zheng jie ta [Peace Signs Become Cliché. Reverse V as Protest. Beyond disses Nicholas Tse: Only Idiots Would Break Guitars].” June 23, 2003. Accessed September 23, 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Ka Chi Cheuk
    • 1
  1. 1.SOASUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations