How Should Firms Deeply Implement Adoptive Management Innovation?

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes the conception of what makes adoptive management innovation unique and a review of literatures on management innovation. Four key perspectives in the literature of management innovation have been identified, including condition perspective, effectiveness perspective, diffusion perspective and process perspective. It is worth noting that the research on management innovation based on Chinese enterprises’ practices is more systematic and in-depth than that abroad, and the research results are abundant. Perhaps the research hasn’t distinguished the adoptive type and all-new type of management innovation, or it has paid more attention and emphasis on the all-new innovation concerning about new knowledge creation, all these studies have laid an important foundation for the exploration of adoptive management innovation.

References

  1. Anand, G., Gray, J., Siemsen, E.: Decay, shock, and renewal. Organ. Sci. 23(6), 1700–1716 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andriopoulos, C., Lewis, M.W.: Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ. Sci. 20(4), 696–717 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyris, C., Schön, D.A.: Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Birkhäuser Basel (1978)Google Scholar
  4. Ashforth, B.E., Fried, Y.: The mindlessness of organizational behaviors. Hum. Relat. 41(4), 305–329 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balogun, J., Johnson, G.: Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Acad. Manag. J. 47(4), 523–549 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barney, J.B.: Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17(1), 99–120 (1991)Google Scholar
  7. Becker, M.C.: Organizational routines: a review of the literature. Ind. Corp. Change 13(4), 643–678 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker, M.C., Lazaric, N., Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G.: Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Post-Print 14(5), 775–791 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. Birkinshaw, J., Mol, M.J.: How management innovation happens”, Sloan Manag. Rev. 47(4), 81–88 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. Birkinshaw, J., Crainer, S., Mol, M.: Special report on management innovation. Bus. Strategy Rev. 18(1), 45–73 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., Mol, M.J.: Management innovation. Acad Manag Rev 33(4) (2008)Google Scholar
  12. Birnholtz, J.P., Cohen, M.D., Hoch, S.V.: Organizational character: on the regeneration of camp poplar grove. Organ. Sci. 18(2), 315–332 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blumer, H.: Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Methods, Englewood Cliffs. Prentice Hall, NJ (1969)Google Scholar
  14. Blumer, H., Morrione, T.J.: George Herbert Mead and Human Conduct. Altamira Press (2004)Google Scholar
  15. Bresman, H.: Changing routines: a process model of vicarious group learning in pharmaceutical R&D. Acad. Manag. J. 56(1), 35–61 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chi, W., Freeman, R.B., Kleiner, M.M.: Adoption and termination of employee involvement programs. NBER working paper, W12878 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, M.D., Bacdayan, P.: Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5(4), 554–568 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen, W.M., Klepper, S.: Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: the case of process and product R&D. Rev. Econ. Stat. 78(2), 232–243 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cronin, M.A., Weingart, L.R.: Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32(3), 761–773 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cyert, R.M., March, J.G.: A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1963)Google Scholar
  21. Damanpour, F., Schneider, M.: Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: effects of environment, organization and top managers. Br. J. Manag. 17(3), 215–236 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Daneshvar, M., Dikmen, I., Birgonul, M.T.: Investigation of organizational routines in construction companies. Working Paper Proceedings. In: Engineering Project Organizations Conference, Rheden, The Netherlands (2012)Google Scholar
  23. DiMaggio, P.J., Powell, W.W.: The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48(2), 147–160 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dionysiou, D.D., Tsoukas, H.: Understanding the (re)creation of routines from within: a symbolic interactions perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 38(2), 181–205 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dittrich, K., Guérard, S., Seidl, D.: Talking about routines: the role of reflective talk in routine change. Organ. Sci. 27(3), 678–697 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Easterby-Smith, M., Lyles, M.A.: How Should We Understand Tacit Knowledge? A Phenomenological View. Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Wiley, London (2015)Google Scholar
  27. Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(4), 532–550 (1989)Google Scholar
  28. Eisenhardt, K.M.: Better stories and better constructs: the case for rigor and comparative logic. Acad. Manag. Rev. 16(3), 620–627 (1991)Google Scholar
  29. Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E.: Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad. Manag. J. 50(1), 25–32 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Feldman, M.S.: Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11(6), 611–629 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Feldman, M.S., Orlikowski, W.J.: Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5), 1240–1253 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Feldman, M.S., Pentland, B.T.: Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Adm. Sci. Q. 48(1), 94–118 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Feldman, M.S., Pentland, B.T.: Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Ind. Corp. Change 14(5), 793–815 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Feldman, M.S., Pentland, B.T.: Designing routines: on the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Inf. Organ. 18(4), 235–250 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Feldman, M.S., Pentland, B.T., D’Adderio, L., Lazaric, N.: Beyond routines as things: introduction to the special issue on routines dynamics. Post-Print 27(3), 505–513 (2016)Google Scholar
  36. Felin, T., Foss, N.J.: Organizational routines a sceptical look. Druid Working Papers, 04–13 (2004)Google Scholar
  37. Geiger, D., Schröder, A.: Ever-changing routines? Toward a revised understanding of organizational routines between rule-following and rule-breaking. Schmalenbach Bus. Rev. 66(2), 170–190 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gersick, C.J., Hackman, J.R.: Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 47(1), 65–97 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago (1967)Google Scholar
  40. Golden-Biddle, K., Locke, K.: Composing Qualitative Research: Crafting Theoretical Points from Qualitative Research. Sage, CA (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Guillén, M.F.: Models of Management: Work, Authority, and Organization in A Comparative Perspective. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1994)Google Scholar
  42. Gummesson, E.: Qualitative Research Methods in Management Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2000)Google Scholar
  43. Hage, J.: Theories of Organization: Form, Process, and Transformation. Wiley, New York (1980)Google Scholar
  44. Hamel, G.: The why, what, and how of management innovation. Harv. Bus. Rev. 84(2), 72–84 (2006)Google Scholar
  45. Hamel, G.: The Future of Management. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2007)Google Scholar
  46. Hannan, M.T., Freeman, J.R.: Structural inertia and organizational change. Am. Sociol. Rev. 49(2), 149–164 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Heimeriks, K.H., Schijven, M., Gates, S.: Manifestations of higher-order routines: the underlying mechanisms of deliberate learning in the context of postacquisition integration. Acad. Manag. J. 55(3), 703–726 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hodgson, G.M.: In: Becker, M.C. (ed.) The Concept of A Routine. Handbook of Organizational Routines. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 14–30 (2008)Google Scholar
  49. Howard-Grenville, J., Rerup, C., Langley, A., Tsoukas, H.: Organizational Routines: How they Are Created, Maintained, and Changed. Oxford University Press (2016)Google Scholar
  50. Howard-Grenville, J.A.: The persistence of flexible organizational routines: the role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. 16(6), 618–636 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Joas, H.: GH Mead: A Contemporary Re-examination of His Thought. MIT Press (1997)Google Scholar
  52. Kotter, J.P., Cohen, D.S.: Creative ways to empower action to change the organization: cases in point. J. Organiz. Excell. 22(1), 73–82 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks. CA (2004a)Google Scholar
  54. Krippendorff, K.: Reliability in content analysis. Hum. Commun. Res. 30(3), 411–433 (2004b)Google Scholar
  55. Langley, A.: Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Manag. Rev. 24(4), 691–710 (1999)Google Scholar
  56. Lazaric, N.: In: Becker, M.C. (ed.) Routines and Routinization: An Exploration of Some Micro-Cognitive Foundations. Handbook of Organizational Routines. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 225–227 (2008)Google Scholar
  57. Lin, H.F., Su, J.Q.: Research on the introducing mechanism of management innovations based on the perspective of internal promoters. Sci. Res. Manag. 31(6), 136–143 (2010)Google Scholar
  58. Lin, H.F., Su, J.Q.: A case study on adoptive management innovation in China. J. Organiz. Change Manag. 27(1), 83–114 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lin, H.F., Su, J.Q., Higgins, A.: How dynamic capabilities affect adoption of management innovations. J. Bus. Res. 69(2), 862–876 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G.: Naturalistic Inquiry Sage. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA (1985)Google Scholar
  61. Loch, C.H., Sengupta, K., Ahmad, M.G.: The microevolution of routines: how problem solving and social preferences interact. Organ. Sci. 24(1), 99–115 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. March, J.G.: Exploration and exploitation in organizational Learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1), 71–87 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. March, J.G., Simon, H.A.: Organizations. Wiley, New York (1958)Google Scholar
  64. Marks, M.L.: Workplace recovery after mergers, acquisitions, and downsizings: facilitating individual adaptation to major organizational transitions. Org. Dyn. 35(4), 384–399 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mccabe, D.: ‘Waiting for Dead Men’s Shoes’: towards a cultural understanding of management innovation. Hum. Relat. 55(5), 505–536 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mead, G.H.: Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. University of Chicago, Chicago (1934)Google Scholar
  67. Meaney, M., Pung, C.: McKinsey global results: creating organizational transformations. McKinsey Q. 7(3), 1–7 (2008)Google Scholar
  68. Miller, D.L.: George Herbert Mead: self, language, and the world. American J. Sociol. (1973)Google Scholar
  69. Miller, K.D., Pentland, B.T., Choi, S.: Dynamics of performing and remembering organizational routines. J. Manage. Stud. 49(8), 1536–1558 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Miner, A.S.: Structural evolution through idiosyncratic jobs: the potential for unplanned learning. Organ. Sci. 1(2), 195–210 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mol, M.J., Birkinshaw, J.: The sources of management innovation: when firms introduce new management practices. J. Bus. Res. 62(12), 1269–1280 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Narduzzo, A., Rocco, E., Warglien, M.: Talking about routines in the field: the emergence of organizational capabilities in a new cellular phone network company. Ceel Working Papers, pp. 27–51 (1997)Google Scholar
  73. Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G.: An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press/Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1982)Google Scholar
  74. Orlikowski, W.J.: Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3), 249–273 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ortmann, G.: On drifting rules and standards. Scand. J. Manag. 26(2), 204–214 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Paper, D., Chang, R.D.: The state of business process reengineering: a search for success factors. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 16(1), 121–133 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Parmigiani, A., Howard-Grenville, J.: Routines revisited: exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Acad. Manag. Ann. 5(1), 413–453 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pentland, B.T., Feldman, M.S., Becker, M.C., Liu, P.: Dynamics of organizational routines: a generative model. Social Sci. Electron. Publ. 49(8), 1484–1508 (2012)Google Scholar
  79. Pentland, B.T., Hærem, T., Hillison, D.: Comparing organizational routines as recurrent patterns of action. Organiz. Stud. 31(7), 917–940 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pentland, B.T., Rem, T., Hillison, D.: The (N)ever-changing world: stability and change in organizational routines. Organ. Sci. 22(6), 1369–1383 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pentland, B.T., Rueter, H.H.: Organizational routines as grammars of action. Adm. Sci. Q. 39(3), 484–510 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pierce, J.L., Delbecq, A.L.: Organization structure, individual attitudes and innovation. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2(1), 27–37 (1977)Google Scholar
  83. Pil, F.K., Macduffie, J.P.: The adoption of high-involvement work practices. Ind. Relat. J. Econ. Soc. 35(3), 423–455 (1996)Google Scholar
  84. Quinn, R.E.: Building The Bridge as You Walk on It: A Guide for Leading Change. Leader to Leader. Jossey-Bass Publishers (2004)Google Scholar
  85. Rentsch, J.R., Small, E.E., Hanges, P.J.: Cognitions in organizations and teams: what is the meaning of cognitive similarity? In: Smith, D.B. (ed.) The People Make the Place: Dynamic Linkages Between Individuals and Organizations, pp. 127–155. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  86. Rerup, C., Feldman, M.S.: Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: the role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Manag. J. 54(3), 577–610 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn. The Free Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  88. Salvato, C., Rerup, C.: Beyond collective entities: multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities. J. Manag. 37(2), 468–490 (2011)Google Scholar
  89. Stene, E.O.: An approach to a science of administration. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 34(6), 1124–1137 (1940)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Strauss, A., Corbin, J.M.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage, Newbury Park, CA (1990)Google Scholar
  91. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg. Manag. J. 18(7), 509–533 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Thompson, T.E.: Direct development in a nudibranch, cadlina laevis, with a discussion of developmental processes in opisthobranchia. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 47(1), 1–22 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tsoukas, H., Chia, R.: On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change. Organ. Sci. 13(5), 567–582 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tucker, A.L., Edmondson, A.C.: Why hospitals don’t learn from failures: organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. Calif. Manag. Rev. 45(2), 55–72 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Turner, S.F., Rindova, V.: A balancing act: how organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organ. Sci. 23(1), 24–46 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Vaccaro, I.G., Jansen, J.J.P., Bosch, F.A.J.V.D., Volberda, H.W.: Management innovation and leadership: the moderating role of organizational size. J. Manage. Stud. 49(1), 28–51 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Van, K.B., Martin, L., Tyler, T.: Process-orientation versus outcome-orientation during organizational change: the role of organizational identification. J. Organiz. Behav. 27(6), 685–704 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Weiss, H.M., Ilgen, D.R.: Routinized behavior in organizations. J. Behav. Econ. 14(1), 57–67 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wernerfelt, B.: A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 5(2), 171–180 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Whalen-Berry, K.S., Gordon, J.R., Hinings, C.B.: Strengthening organizational change processes: recommendations and implications from a multi-level analysis. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 39(2), 186–207 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Winter, S.G.: Toward a neo-schumpeterian theory of the firm. Soc. Sci. Electron. Publ. 15(1), 125–141 (2006)Google Scholar
  102. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury Park, CA (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Management and EconomicsDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations