ICIIT 2017: Smart Secure Systems – IoT and Analytics Perspective pp 224-238 | Cite as
E-FPROMETHEE: An Entropy Based Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making Service Ranking Approach for Cloud Service Selection
Abstract
The immense popularity and rapid adoption of cloud computing has led to the emergence of various cloud service providers, offering functionally-equivalent services. This scenario complicates the identification of an appropriate and trustworthy cloud service provider with respect to the unique Quality of Service (QoS) requirement of the users. Trust based service selection approaches prove to be a prominent solution for the cloud service selection problem since trust evaluation of the cloud services exploits the intrinsic relations between the QoS attributes. This paper presents Shannon entropy based Fuzzy PROMETHEE service ranking approach for the identification of trustworthy cloud service providers. A case study using real world QoS data from Cloud Harmony demonstrates the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed approach in terms various quality metrics (trustworthiness, untrustworthiness, uncertainty) and sensitivity analysis.
Keywords
Cloud service ranking Entropy Fuzzy logic Multi Criteria Decision Making Trustworthy service providersReferences
- 1.Chiregi, M., Navimipour, N.: A new method for trust and reputation evaluation in the cloud environments using the recommendations of opinion leaders’ entities and removing the effect of troll. Comput. Hum. Behav. 60, 280–292 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Mell, P., Grance, T.: The NIST definition of cloud computing (2011)Google Scholar
- 3.Nivethitha, S., Kannan, K., Sriram, V.S.S.: A computational model for ranking cloud service providers using hypergraph based techniques. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 68, 14–30 (2016)Google Scholar
- 4.Somu, N., Kirthivasan, K., Sriram, V.S.S.: A rough set-based hypergraph trust measure parameter selection technique for cloud service selection. J. Supercomput. 73(10), 4535–4559 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Thampi, S., Bhargava, B., Atrey, P.: Managing Trust in Cyberspace. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Qu, L.: Credible service selection in cloud environments (2016)Google Scholar
- 7.Tang, M., Dai, X., Liu, J., Chen, J.: Towards a trust evaluation middleware for cloud service selection. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 74, 302–312 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Mao, C., Lin, R., Xu, C., He, Q.: Towards a trust prediction framework for cloud services based on PSO-driven neural network. IEEE Access 5, 2187–2199 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Ma, H., Zhu, H., Hu, Z., Tang, W., Dong, P.: Multi-valued collaborative QoS prediction for cloud service via time series analysis. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 68, 275–288 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Ma, H., Hu, Z., Li, K., Zhang, H.: Toward trustworthy cloud service selection: a time-aware approach using interval neutrosophic set. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 96, 75–94 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Al-Masri, E., Mahmoud, Q.H.: QoS-based discovery and ranking of web services. In: Proceedings - International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, ICCCN, pp. 529–534 (2007)Google Scholar
- 12.Costa, P.M.A.C.: Evaluating cloud services using multicriteria decision analysis (2013)Google Scholar
- 13.Sun, L., Dong, H., Hussain, F.K., Hussain, O.K., Chang, E.: Cloud service selection: state-of-the-art and future research directions. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 45, 134–150 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Sidhu, J., Singh, S.: Design and comparative analysis of MCDM-based multi-dimensional trust evaluation schemes for determining trustworthiness of cloud service providers. J. Grid Comput. 15, 197–218 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Efe, B.: An integrated fuzzy multi criteria group decision making approach for ERP system selection. Appl. Soft Comput. 38, 106–117 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Cloud harmony cloud reports: http://static.lindsberget.se/state-of-the-cloud-compute-0714.pdf (2014)
- 17.Garg, S.K., Versteeg, S., Buyya, R.: A framework for ranking of cloud computing services. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29, 1012–1023 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Sidhu, J., Singh, S.: Improved TOPSIS method based trust evaluation framework for determining trustworthiness of cloud service providers. J. Grid Comput. 15(1), 81–105 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Ervural, B.C., Zaim, S., Demirel, O.F., Aydin, Z., Delen, D.: An ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS-based SWOT analysis for Turkey’s energy planning. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. Part 1 82, 1538–1550 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Lee, K.C., Tsai, W.H., Yang, C.H., Lin, Y.Z.: An MCDM approach for selecting green aviation fleet program management strategies under multi-resource limitations. J. Air Transp. Manag. 1–10, July 2017Google Scholar
- 21.Yazdani, M., Chatterjee, P., Zavadskas, E.K., Zolfani, S.H.: Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection. J. Clean. Prod. 142, 3728–3740 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Büyüközkan, G., Karabulut, Y., Arsenyan, J.: RFID service provider selection: an integrated fuzzy MCDM approach. Measurement 112, 88–98 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Alabool, H.M., Mahmood, A.K.: Trust-based service selection in public cloud computing using fuzzy modified VIKOR method. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 7, 211–220 (2013)Google Scholar
- 24.Rai, D., Kumar, P.: Instance based multi criteria decision model for cloud service selection using TOPSIS and VIKOR. Int. J. Comput Eng. Technol. 7, 78–87 (2016)Google Scholar
- 25.Kumar, R.R., Mishra, S., Kumar, C.: Prioritizing the solution of cloud service selection using integrated MCDM methods under Fuzzy environment. J. Supercomput. 73(11), 4652–4682 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Sun, L., Dong, H., Hussain, F.K., Hussain, O.K., Ma, J., Zhang, Y.: A hybrid fuzzy framework for cloud service selection. In: IEEE International Conference on Web Service, pp. 313–320 (2014)Google Scholar
- 27.Zhao, Z., Jiang, Y., Zhao, X.: SLA_oriented service selection in cloud environment : a PROMETHEE_based Approach. In: 2015 4th International Conference on Computer Science Network Technology, pp. 872–875 (2015)Google Scholar
- 28.Singh, S., Sidhu, J.: Compliance-based multi-dimensional trust evaluation system for determining trustworthiness of cloud service providers. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 67, 109–132 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Rădulescu, C.Z., Rădulescu, I.C.: An extended TOPSIS approach for ranking cloud service providers. Stud. Inform. Control 26, 183–192 (2017)Google Scholar
- 30.Liu, S., Chan, F.T.S.S., Ran, W.: Decision making for the selection of cloud vendor: an improved approach under group decision-making with integrated weights and objective/subjective attributes. Expert Syst. Appl. 55, 37–47 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Sun, L., Ma, J., Zhang, Y., Dong, H., Hussain, F.K.: Cloud-FuSeR: fuzzy ontology and MCDM based cloud service selection. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 57, 42–55 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Shetty, J., D’Mello, D.A.: Quality of service driven cloud service ranking and selection algorithm using REMBRANDT approach. In: Proceedings of 2015 International Conference on Smart Technology Management for Computing, Communication, Controls, Energy and Materials ICSTM 2015, pp. 126–132 (2015)Google Scholar
- 33.Dwivedi, A.N.: Handbook of Research on Information Technology Management and Clinical Data Administration in Healthcare. IGI Global, Hershey (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Malczewski, J., Rinner, C.: Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Geographic Information Science. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar