Design of Rate 3/4, 16-States, 16-PSK, Trellis-Coded Modulation Code for AWGN Channel

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 695)

Abstract

Generally, ‘encoding and decoding’ and ‘modulation and demodulation’ are considered as two independent isolated activities, while designing any digital communication system. Implementation of ‘encoding and decoding’ such as block coding, TCM, turbo coding ensures that the errors introduced by the channel are mitigated, and the implementation of ‘modulation and demodulation’ such as BPSK, 8-PSK, 64-QAM at the baseband level enables the optimum data transfer depending on the channel conditions. In order to improve the BER, error correction schemes are implemented in the digital communication system under design, wherein data is encoded prior transmission; however, in this process bandwidth gets expanded. This bandwidth expansion, however, can be mitigated by suitability changing the modulation schemes, e.g. if the normal modulation scheme used is BPSK but if data is encoded at the rate ½, then changing modulation scheme to QPSK will preserve the bandwidth. Integration of convolutional code with the modulation type is known as trellis-coded modulation (TCM). The concept of TCM was though invented in 1970s; it is presently being utilised in many contemporary systems engaged in the field of data communication. A new TCM scheme having rate 3/4, 16-state, 16-PSK, in respect of additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel has been proposed in this paper. Results have been quite encouraging and have indicated the coding gain of approximately 2 dB when compared to uncoded 8-PSK.

References

  1. 1.
    Biglieri, E., Divsalar, D., Mclane, P.J., Simon, M.K.: Introduction to Trellis-Coded Modulation with Applications. Maxwell Macmillan International Editions (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sinha, S., Shrivastava, R.: OFDM PAPR reduction using trellis coded modulation. Infotech Educ. Soc. J. Sci. Technol. 1(1) (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, J.B., Svensson, A.: Coded Modulation System. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publisher (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Malhotra, J.: Investigation of channel coding techniques for high data rate mobile wireless systems. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 115(3), 0975–8887 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vallavaraj, A., et. al.: The effects of convolutional coding on BER performance of companded OFDM signals. In: International Conference on Communication, Computer & Power (ICCCP 2005) Muscat, pp. 14–16, Feb 2005Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jamali H.S., Ngoc, T.L.: Coded Modulation Techniques for Fading Channels. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Proakis, J.G., Manolakis, D.G.: Digital Signal Processing: Principles, Algorithms and Applications, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi (1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schlegel, C.B., Pérez, L.C.: Trellis and Turbo Coding. Wiley (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ungerboeck: Trellis-coded modulation with redundant signal sets part II: state of the art. IEEE Commun. Mag. 25(2), 12–21 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kroll, J.M., Phamdo, N.C.: Analysis and design of trellis codes optimized for a binary symmetric markov source with MAP detection. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theor. 44(7), 2977–2987 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alamouti, S.M., Kallel, S.: Adaptive trellis-coded multiple-phase-shift keying for Rayleigh fading channels. IEEE Trans. Commun. 42, 2305–2314 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EngineeringAndhra UniversityVisakhapatnamIndia

Personalised recommendations