Advertisement

Study on Synthesis and Properties of Gemini Surfactant Used as Viscoelastic Surfactant (VES)

Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering book series (SSGG)

Abstract

As one kind of the new surfactants with novel structure, higher surface activity, lower critical micelle concentration, and lower Krafft point, the quaternary ammonium gemini surfactants have a promising application prospect in viscoelastic surfactant (VES). In this paper, one kind of viscoelastic cationic gemini surfactant was synthesized through using N,N-dimethyl-1, 3-propane diamine, octadecanoic acid, and 1,4-dibromobutane. The molecular structure of the surfactant was characterized by 1H NMR, the self-assembly structure was observed by atomic force microscopy, and the viscoelasticity behavior was measured through rheological measurements. The study shows that the gemini surfactant can form self-assembled structures in single system, and the molecular self-assembly driven by the non-covalent interactions can provide the foundation for building well-defined structures in the nanometer or micrometer length scale. In addition, stable viscoelastic behavior was observed in the surfactant system, with strong binding energy and electrostatic interactions. This work can reveal the interaction mechanism between the molecules and the synergistic interactions of various non-covalent forces at molecular level, which is significant to study the viscoelastic surfactant used in clean fracturing fluid.

Keywords

VES Gemini surfactant Self-assembly Viscoelasticity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21303268, U1663206), the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (51425406), the Chang Jiang Scholars Program (T2014152).

References

  1. 1.
    Cawiezel KE, Gupta DVS (2009) Successful optimization of viscoelastic foamed fracturing fluids with ultralightweight proppants for ultralow-permeability reservoirs. SPE Prod Oper 25:80–88Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hughes K, Santos N, Urbina RA, Nadezhdin S (2008) New viscoelastic surfactant fracturing fluids now compatible with CO2 drastically improve gas production in rockiesGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gomaa AM, Cawiezel K, Gupta DVS, Carman PS, Nasr-El-Din HA (2011) Viscoelastic evaluation of a surfactant gel for hydraulic fracturing. Society of Petroleum EngineersGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rehage H, Hoffmann H (2010) Rheological properties of viscoelastic surfactant systems. J Phys Chem 92:4712–4719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dahayanake Manilal S, Yang J (2002) Viscoelastic surfactant fluids and related methods of useGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zana R, Kaler EW (2007) Giant micelles: properties and applications. Aseanheartjournal OrgGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang J, Cui W, Lu Y, Guan B, Qiu X, Liu P (2015) Instant gel formation of viscoelastic surfactant fracturing fluids by diluting through lamellar liquid crystal. J Petrol Sci Eng 125:90–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khair EMM, Shicheng Z, Shanbo M, Mei Z (2011) Performance and application of new anionic D3F-AS05 viscoelastic fracturing fluid. J Petrol Sci Eng 78:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zana R (2002) Dimeric and oligomeric surfactants. Behavior at interfaces and in aqueous solution: a review. Adv Colloid Inter Sci 97:205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zana R, Xia J (2004) Gemini surfactants: synthesis, interfacial and solution-phase behavior, and applications. Marcel DekkerGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zana R, Xia J (2003) Gemini surfactants: synthesis, interfacial and solution-phase behavior, and applicationsGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yoshimura T, Bong M, Matsuoka K, Honda C, Endo K (2009) Surface properties and aggregate morphology of partially fluorinated carboxylate-type anionic gemini surfactants. J Colloid Inter Sci 339:230–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang Y, Chu Z, Dreiss CA, Wang Y, Fei C, Feng Y (2013) Smart wormlike micelles switched by CO2 and air. Soft Matter 9:6217–6221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhao M, Yan Z, Dai C, Du M, Li H, Zhao Y, Wang K, Ding Q (2015) Formation and rheological properties of wormlike micelles by N-hexadecyl-N-methylpiperidinium bromide and sodium salicylate. Colloid Polym Sci 293:1073–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suksamranchit S, Sirivat A, Jamieson AM (2006) Influence of polyethylene oxide on the rheological properties of semidilute, wormlike micellar solutions of hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride and sodium salicylate. J Colloid Interface Sci 304:497–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin Y, Han X, Huang J, Fu H, Yu C (2009) A facile route to design pH-responsive viscoelastic wormlike micelles: smart use of hydrotropes. J Colloid Interface Sci 330:449–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wei XL, Ping AL, Du PP, Liu J, Sun DZ, Zhang QF, Hao HG, Yu HJ (2013) Formation and properties of wormlike micelles in solutions of a cationic surfactant with a 2-hydroxypropoxy insertion group. Soft Matter 9:8454–8463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rehage H, Hoffmann H (1988) Rheological properties of viscoelastic surfactant systems. J Phys Chem 92:4712–4719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zana R (1987) Surfactant solutions: new methods of investigation. Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Granek R, Cates ME (1992) Stress relaxation in living polymers: results from a poisson renewal model. J Chem Phys 96:4758–4767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    And DPA, Kunieda H (2003) Formation of viscoelastic wormlike micellar solutions in mixed nonionic surfactant systems. J Phys Chem B 107:10168–10175CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Petroleum EngineeringChina University of Petroleum (East China)QingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations