Advertisement

Comprehensive Review of Alkaline–Surfactant–Polymer (ASP)-Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)

  • Peng Yang
  • Zi-an Li
  • Bin Xia
  • Ya-juan Yuan
  • Qaing-tai Huang
  • Wei-liang Liu
  • Chi-yu Cheng
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering book series (SSGG)

Abstract

Alkaline–surfactant–polymer (ASP) flooding has developed into the important economical and effective technical method which has been verified that ASP flooding can enhance recovery ratio 10% compared to polymer drive, compares the water drive enhancement recovery ratio above 20%. Especially for upgrading old oil–gas field with high water-cut stage, the advantages of ASP flooding synergetic effect are more clearly compared with the previous solutions such as water driving, polymer, and surfactant flooding. There are over 83 × 108 tons of the reserves for ASP flooding which can be produced by injecting ASP solutions; there are over 14 × 108 tons of the reserves only for Daqing oil field that can be produced by injecting ASP solutions. ASP flooding is a research hot spot, difficult points and the leading edge of exploration and development of oil–gas field with great potential and broad prospects. This paper has introduced new developments, explained features and displacement mechanism of ASP-enhanced oil recovery (EOR), and analyzed the urgent key technical hurdles of ASP (EOR). Comprehensive compared challenges and corresponding solutions of ASP flooding (EOR) among domestic and foreign oil-gas field, we discussed the industrialization promotion prospects of ASP flooding (EOR).

Keywords

ASP flooding Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) Displacement efficiency Recovery ratio Industrialization prospect 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by Major National Science and Technology Project (No. 2016ZX05054013), The National Nature Science Foundation of China (Project No. 41372208 and No. 40534019), and The Open Found of the State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, CAS (Project No. 201304).

References

  1. 1.
    Cheng JC, Wu JZ, Hu JQ (2014) Key theories and technologies for enhanced oil recovery of alkaline/surfactant/polymer flooding. Acta Pet Sinica 35(2):310–318Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beckstrom RC, van Tuyl FM (1927) The effect of flooding oil sands with alkaline solutions. AAPG Bull 11(3):223–235Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arkinson H (1927) Recovery of petroleum from oil bearing sans. US, 1651311, Nov 1927Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Foster WR (1973) Alow-tension water flooding process. J Pet Tech 25:205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rudin J, Wasan DT (1993) Surfactant-enhanced alkaline flooding: buffering at intermediate pH. SPE, 21027Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yuan SY (1998) Effects of important factors on alkali/surfactant/polymerflooding. SPE, 50916Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Touhami Y, Neale GH, Hornof V (1996) Mechanisms for the interactions between acidic oils and surfactant-enhanced alikaline solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci 177(2):446–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arihara N (1999) Oil recovery mechanisms of alkali-surfactant-polymer flooding. SPE, 54330Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng JC, Liao GZ, Yang ZY, Li Q, Yao YM, Xu DP (2001) Pilot test on ASP flooding in Daqing oil field. Pet Geol Oilfield Dev Daqing 20(2):46–50Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang HF, Wu XL, Zhang GY, Yang Y (2004) Research progress on the surfactants for ASP flooding in Daqing oilfield. Pet Geol Recovery Eff 11(5):62–64Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lake LW (1989) Enhanced oil recovery. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sarkyt K (2015) Alkaline/surfactant/polymer (ASP) flooding. Int J Biol Chem 8(1):30–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johnson CE Jr (1976) JPT, pp 85–92Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sheng JJ (2014) A comprehensive review of alkaline-surfactant-polymer (ASP) flooding. Asia Pacific J Chem Eng 9:471–489Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Olajire AA (2014) Review of ASP EOR (alkaline surfactant polymer enhanced oil recovery) technology in the petroleum industry: Prospects and challenges. Energy 77:963–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stegemeier GL (1977) Mechanisms of entrapment and mobilization of oil in porous media. In: Improved oil recovery by surfactant and polymer flooding. Academic Press, New York, pp 55–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sheng JJ (2013) Surfactant enhanced oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs. EOR field case studies. Elsevier, Waltham, pp 281–299Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sorbie KS (1991) Polymer-improved oil recovery. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FloridaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    He QX (2015) The review of ASP (alkaline-surfactant-polymer) enhanced oil recovery technology. Guangzhou Chem Ind 43(16):49–51Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chang HL, Zhang ZQ, Wang QM, Xu ZS, Guo ZD, Sun GQ (2006) Advances in polymer flooding and alkaline/surfactant/polymer processes as developed and applied in the People’s Republic of China. J Petrol Technol 58:84–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li HF, Liao GZ, Han PH, Yang ZY, Wu XL, Chen GY, Xu DP, Jin PQ (2003) Alkaline/surfactant/polymer (ASP) commercial flooding test in Central Xing2 area of Daqing oilfield (SPE-84896). In: Proceedings of SPE Asia Pacific international improved oil recovery conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 20–21 Oct 2003Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li D, Shi M, Wang D, Li Z (2009) Chromatographic separation of chemical in alkaline surfactant polymer flooding in reservoir rocks in the Daqing oil field (SPE-121598). In: Proceedings of SPE international symposium on oilfield chemistry, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 20–22 Apr 2009Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang DM, Cheng JC, Wu JZ, Yang ZY, Yao YM (1999) Summary of ASP pilots in Daqing oil field (SPE-57288). In: Proceedings of SPE Asia Pacific IOR conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 25–26 Oct 1999Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pu H, Xu QL (2009) An update and perspective on field-scale chemical floods in Daqing oilfield, China. SPE 118746Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Qiao Q, Gu HJ, Li DW, Dong L (2000) The pilot test of ASP combination flooding in Karamay oil field. In: Paper SPE 64726 presented at the 2000 SPE international oil and gas conference and exhibition in China, Beijing, 7–10 Nov 2000Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gu HJ, Yang RQ, Guo SG, Guan WD, Yue XJ, Pan QY (1998) Study on reservoir engineering: ASP (alkali, surfactant, polymer) flooding pilot test in Karamay oilfield (SPE-50918). In: Proceedings of 6th SPE oil & gas international conference, Beijing, China, 2–6 Nov 1998Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jing GL, Tang S, Li XX, Yu T, Gai YJ (2013) The scaling conditions for ASP flooding oilfield in the fourth Plant of Daqing oilfield. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 3(3):175–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yang QY, Gong WH, Jia ZW (1999) Mechanism of ASP flooding in Daqing Oil field. Pet Geol Oilfield Dev Daqing 18(3):24–27Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li DS, Hou JR, Xu RJ (2001) Adsorption of components from ASP flooding solution onto reservoir rock of Daqing. Oilfield Chem 18(4):358–361Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wu D, Wang SC, Meng XC, Sun FX, Zhao FL, Wang QS, Liang HC (2002) Thermo-chemical demulsification/dehydration of high water cut crude oil produced from ASP flooding reservoir in Daqing. Oilfield Chem 19(1):54–58Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhao CJ, Li XF, Zhou SH (2006) Analysis on oilfield scaling of ASP flooding in Daqing Oilfield. Pet Geol Recovery Eff 13(4):93–95Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wei Chen, Zhang QS (2010) Analysis on scaling influencing factors and status in ASP flooding. Chem Eng 12:44–46Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liang YN, Cao G, Shi GC, Wang GQ, Li JL, Zhao YL (2011) Progressing cavity pump anti-scaling techniques in alkaline surfactant-polymer flooding in the Daqing Oilfield. Pet Explor Dev 38(4):483–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yu T, Jing GL, Li G, Guo FL, Jiang B (2001) Studying of scale build up mechanism of triple compound flooding: interaction sodiumhydroxide with kaolin and montmorillonite. J Daqing Pet Ins 25(2):28–30Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Xu GM, Jiang YM, Dang QG, Xu ZY (2013) Scaling type in alkaline-surfactant-polymer (ASP) flooding in the fourth plant of Daqing Oilfield. Chem Eng Oil Gas 1:58–60Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chen JB (2013) Study on the scale mechanism and the scale inhibitor in the ASP flooding in Daqing Oilfield. Chinese University of Geosciences, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cheng JC, Wang QG, Zhou WF, Li S, Cheng TX, Zhou GD (2014) Synthesis and application of silicon scale inhibitor SY-KD under the ASP flooding system. Chem J Chin Univ 35(2):332–337Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Li HB, Sui J, Yang ZY (2001) Optimization design on injection procedure and chemica slug size of alkaline/surfactant/polymer combination flooding in Daqing oilfield. J Southwest Pet Ins 23(5):46–49Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhou YZ, Yin DY, Zhang CL (2014) Preparation and plug optimization of profile control agent in ASP flooding. Pet Geol Recovery Eff 21(5):73–76Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhao LS (2008) Economic research on alkaline-surfactant-polymer (ASP) flooding in Daqing Oilfield. China university of petroleum, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Xu J (2014) Discussion of economic feasibility for ASP flooding in DaQing oilfield. Oil-Gas Field Surf Eng 33(10):98–99Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhang YG, Wang YQ, Qu ZJ, Zhao JD (1994) Pilot results of alkaline/surfactant/polymer flooding in Guantao formation, Gudong oilfield. Oilfield Chem 11(2):143–148Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Guo LL (2006) An expanded combination chemical flooding test in Gudao Oilfield. Pet Explor Dev 33(4):495–499Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Qiao Q, Gu HJ, Li DW, Guo SG, Dong L (2000) Pilot test of ASP three element composite flooding in EZ area, Karamay Oilfield. In: China international petroleum and natural gas conferenceGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sun LD, Qiao Q (1997) Study on oil-water interfacial tension characteristics of ASP flooding system in block II of Karamay oil fieldoil. Xinjiang Pet Sci Technol 7(1):45–53Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wang Y, Qiao Q, Dong L, Lei XJ (1999) A Low-cost ASP flooding system for industrial extending EOR test at east block I of district VII in Karamay. Oilfield Chem 16(3):247–250Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Liu P, Chen MG Formula selection and oil displacement test of ASP flooding in block JZ9-3, Bohai oilfieldGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Clark SR, Pitts MJ, Smith SM (1993) Design and application of an alkaline-surfactant-polymer recovery system to the west Kiehlfield. SPE Adv Technol Ser 1(1):172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gregersen CS, Kazempour M, Alvarado V (2013) ASP design for the Minnelusa formation under low-salinity conditions: impacts of anhydrite on ASP performance. Fuel 105:368–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pitts MJ, Dowling P, Wyatt K, Surkalo H, Adams KC (2006) Alkaline-surfactant-polymer flood of the Tanner Field. In: SPE/DOE symposium on improved oil recover, Society of Petroleum EngineersGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    French T (1999) Evaluation of the Sho-Vel-Tum alkali-surfactant-polymer (ASP) oil recovery project. DOE/SW/45030e1. Tulsa, OK, USA, US. Department of EnergyGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Charest M (2013) Alkaline-surfactant-polymer(ASP) flooding in Alberta: small amounts of the right chemicals can make a big difference. Can Discov Dig 1:20–52Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Pratap M, Gauma MS (2004) Field implementation of alkalinesurfactant-polymer (ASP) flooding, a maiden effort in India. In: paper SPE 88455 presented at the SPE Asia Pacific oil and gas conference and exhibition, Perth, Australia, 18–20 Oct 2004Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Jain AK, Dhawan AK, Misra TR (2012) ASP flood pilot in Jhalora (K-IV), India-a case study, paper SPE 153667 presented at the SPE oil and gas India conference and exhibition, Mumbai, India, 28–30 Mar 2012Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bataweel MA, Nasr-El-Din HA (2011) Alternatives to minimize scale precipitation in carbonate cores caused by alkalis in asp flooding in high salinity/high temperature applications. In: SPE European formation damage conference, Society of Petroleum EngineersGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Liu H, Gao G, Shi GC (2007) Technical breakthrough in PCPs’ scaling issue of ASP flooding in Daqing Oilfield. SPE 109165Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Arensdorf J, Hoster D, Mcdougall DB, Yuan MD (2010) Static and dynamic testing of silicate scale inhibitors. SPE 132212Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Green DW, Willhite GP (1998) Enhanced oil recovery, SPE textbook series, vol 6. Richardson, Texas: Henry L. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME, Society of Petroleum Engineers; 1998Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Clara H, Chacon LJ, Lorenzo A, Abel B, Jie Q, Phillip C, Pitts MJ (2003) ASP system design for an offshore application in La Salina Field, Lake Maracaibo. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 6(3):147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Raney KH, Ayirala S, Chin RW, Verbeek P (2012) Surface and subsurface requirements for successful implementation of offshore chemical enhanced oil recovery. SPE Prod Oper 27(3):294–305Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    More DC, Vert M, Jouenne S, Gauchet RRM, Bouger Y (2012) First polymer injection in deep offshore field Angola: recent advances on Dalia/Camelia Field Case. Oil Gas Facil 1(2):68Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Zhou W, Zhang J, Feng GZ, Jiang W, Sun FJ, Zhou SW, Liu YG (2008) Key technologies of polymer flooding in offshore oilfield of Bohai Bay, SPE paper, No. 11240, 2008Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Morel DC, Jouenne S, Vert M, Nahas E (2008) Polymer injection in deep offshore field: the Dalia Angola Case, (SPE-116672). In: Proceedings of SPE annual. Olajire AA (2014) Energy 77:963–982, 981. In: Technical conference and exhibition, Denver, CO, USA, 21–24 Sept 2008Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peng Yang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Zi-an Li
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Bin Xia
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Ya-juan Yuan
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Qaing-tai Huang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Wei-liang Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chi-yu Cheng
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Marine ScienceSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Offshore Oil Exploration and Development of Guangdong Higher Education InstitutesGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.Offshore Oil Exploration and Development Center of Sun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  4. 4.State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry Chinese Academy of SciencesGuiyangChina

Personalised recommendations