Advertisement

Dynamic Variation of Rheological Behavior and Displacement of Polymer Flooding in Mid-Low Permeability Cores

  • J. Liu
  • W. Chen
  • Z. X. Lei
  • G. Lei
  • Y. B. Li
  • W. R. Li
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering book series (SSGG)

Abstract

On artificial long cores with multiple measuring points and standard cores, laboratory experiments were carried out for the rheological behavior and oil displacement capability of polymer (HPAM) solution with mass concentration of 1500 mg/L. The relative molecular mass of polymer was 1200 × 104. The pressure and oil saturation distribution were analyzed by using the numerical model. The results indicated that the rheological behavior of polymer solution was shear thinning and shear thickening. Moreover, the longer the migration distance was, the narrower the shear rate range was, and the smaller the critical shear rate was. The maximum injection pressure was 5.67 Mpa, and the stable value was 5.21 Mpa when injected the polymer solution into the cores with permeability of 50 × 10−3 μm2 and length of 85 cm. The resistance coefficient of inlet and outlet was stable at 185 and 6, respectively, which indicated that the polymer solution was blocked at near area of inlet and the oil displacement capacity was limited at near area of outlet. The oil recovery of polymer flooding was increased 8.9% point compared with that of water flooding when injected 0.3 PV polymer solution into the standard core after the water cut reached 70%. The variation with the migration distance of rheological behavior and the oil displacement capacity of polymer solution was important for further study on the matching of low permeability reservoir with the polymer solution.

Keywords

Rheological behavior Pressure gradient Resistance coefficient Oil displacement capacity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their appreciation for the help from the experts of American Apartment in RIPED and the help from CUPB.

References

  1. 1.
    Hu B, Liu H, Li L (1997) Polymer flooding production engineering. Petroleum Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cao G, Liu T, Ba Y, Xu D, Wang T, Zhao F, Shu Q (2013) Microbial flooding after polymer flooding pilot test in Ng3 of Zhong1 area, Gudao oilfield. Pet Geol Recovery Effi 20(6):94–96Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu Z, Wang Q, Sun Y et al (2014) Study and application of new technological limit for polymer flooding in field application. Pet Geol Recovery Effi 21(2):22–24Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xie X, Feng G, Liu L et al (2015) Study on enhanced oil recovery technology after polymer flooding in offshore oilfield. Pet Geol Recovery Effi 22(1):93–97Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang DM (2014) Some thoughts about potential of oil recovery efficiency and development model transition in Shengli district. Pet Geol Recovery Effi 21(4):1–4Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang Q, Ji B, Nie J (2014) M. Calculation methods of sweep efficiency under different viscosity ratios for polymer flooding process. Oil Gas Geol 35(4):551–555Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Liu
    • 1
  • W. Chen
    • 2
  • Z. X. Lei
    • 1
  • G. Lei
    • 3
  • Y. B. Li
    • 1
  • W. R. Li
    • 3
  1. 1.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and DevelopmentBeijingChina
  2. 2.Sinopec International Petroleum Exploration & Production CorporationBeijingChina
  3. 3.Beijing Innovation Center for Engineering Science and Advanced Technology, Peking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations