Advertisement

Paleoclimate Analyzing Based on Development Morphology of River System

  • Xunxun Fu
  • Kangle Wang
  • Aiping Hu
  • Li Jia
  • Wenxiang Liu
  • Jie Shao
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering book series (SSGG)

Abstract

Generally, development morphology of river system can indicate climate, the more humid climate was, the more complicated development morphology was, while fractal dimension can be used as a parameter for describing development morphology of river system. Based on this understanding, a climate-type identification chart and precipitation calculation model to analyze paleoclimate characteristics is presented in this paper. The climate-types identification chart described palaeoclimate based on the development morphology of river system, and the precipitation calculation model calculated palaeoclimate type and annual precipitation by the fractal data of the development morphology. Taking the Late Ordovician river system in Ordos Basin as an example, paleoclimate analysis results showed that the study area was in a humid paleoclimate, annual precipitation was about 2106 mm. This calculation results are consistent with the existing geological cognition. The climate-type identification chart and precipitation calculation model provide an easier and cheaper way of paleoclimate analyzing compared to paleomagnetism, sediment, and pollen analysis.

Keywords

Paleoclimate analysis Development morphology of river system Fractal characteristics Ordos basin 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thanks the staff of natural gas exploration department of Changqing Exploration and Development Institute; this study was financially supported by National Science and Technology Major Project “Resource Potential Assessment, Enrichment Regularity and Favorable Area Optimization of Tight Gas” under contract number No. 2016ZX05047001. Huang Daojun made many helpful comments.

References

  1. 1.
    Mandelbrot BB (1967) How long is the coast of Britain. Science 3775(156):636–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hu Z, Shen J (1996) Study on fractal characteristics of karst morphology system and its mechanism. Earth Sin J China Univ Geosci 19(1):102–107Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sari B, Kusumayudha MT (2000) Fractal analysis of the Oyo river, cave systems, and topography of the Gunungsewu karst area, central Java, Indonesia. Hydrol J 29(8):271–278Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    He L, Zhao H (1996) The fractal dimension of river networks and its interpretation. Sci Geogr Sin 6(2):124–128MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feng J, Zhang W (1999) Watershed fractal of Haihe river and Luanhe river. Sedi Res 1:62–65Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang B, Tian F, Hu H (2009) Relationship between water system development and climatic characteristics based on fractal dimension. J Tsinghua Univ Sci Tech 49(12):1948–1953Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dai J, Yan N (2004) Erdos geological characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation rules of paleokarst gas reservoir, 1st edn. Petroleum Industry Press Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang H, Huang D, Zheng C (2006) Characteristics of gas reservoir and exploration achievement for Ordovician paleokarst landform in Ordos Basin. China Petrol Explor 11(3):1–5Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen Y, Chen L (2005) Fractal geometry, 1st edn. Seism PressGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    He Z, Yang H, Han S (2000) The study of paleokarst characteristics and trap conditions in Erdos Basin. Res Rep, 67–68Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xunxun Fu
    • 1
  • Kangle Wang
    • 1
  • Aiping Hu
    • 1
  • Li Jia
    • 1
  • Wenxiang Liu
    • 1
  • Jie Shao
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Exploration and DevelopmentXi’anChina
  2. 2.Changqing Industry Group CooperationXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations