Advertisement

Effect of Fluid Exposure on Mechanical Properties of Organic-Rich Shale and Field Applications

  • C. Lin
  • Y. L. Kang
  • L. J. You
  • X. P. Yan
  • Q. Chen
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering book series (SSGG)

Abstract

Understanding the effect of fluid exposure on organic-rich shale mechanical properties is crucial in design of working fluids used in shale reservoir drilling and hydraulic fracturing. A series of triaxial compression tests and friction coefficient measurements were conducted on dry and fluid exposure specimen of three typical organic-rich shales in China. Fluid-type and time-dependent variation of mechanical properties were significantly observed between dry and fluid exposure specimen. These variations are attributed to the specific fabric feature of organic-rich shale and different fluid–shale interaction mechanisms, which is predominantly hydration for water-based fluid and friction reduction for oil-based fluid. Fluid exposure effect will increase the risk of wellbore instability through increasing pore pressure and decreasing shale strength. It also influences the propagation and orientation of hydraulic fractures, strengthens proppant embedment, and induces fines migration and colloids agglomeration/precipitation in hydraulic fracturing. Improve sealing performance, apply clay stabilizer and surfactant, manage pH value, and increase drilling rate are mainly effective methods to prevent or mitigate adverse effect of fluid exposure on shale oil/gas well drilling and production performance. These fluid effect control strategies have been successfully applied in the shale reservoir drilling in Sichuan Basin and Ordos Basin.

Keywords

Rock mechanics Shale Fluid–shale interaction Wellbore stability Hydraulic fracturing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (No. 2016ZX05061), the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51674209), and the Youth Science and Technology Innovation Team Project of Sichuan Province of China.

References

  1. 1.
    Liu XJ, Liu H, Luo PY, Liang DC, Huang JJ (2009) Research on effect of drilling fluid on Kuqa Shale strength behavior and its application. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 28(S2):3920–3925Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lu YH, Chen M, Jin Y, Teng XQ, Wu W, Liu XQ (2012) Experimental study of strength properties of deep mudstone under drilling fluid soaking. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 31(7):1399–1405Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu YF, Kang YL, You LJ, Chen Q, Yang B (2013) Alkali corrosion: a new mechanism of shale borehole instability. Acta Petrolei Sinaca 34(5):983–988Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Almasoodi MM, Abousleiman YN, Hoang SK (2014) Viscoelastic creep of eagle ford shale: investigating fluid/shale interaction. In: SPE/CSUR unconventional resources conference-Canada, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yuan HY, Chen P (2015) Strength weakening rules of shale hydration based on direct shear tests. Nat Gas Ind 35(11):71–77MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lai BT, Liang F, Zhang JL, Li LM, Liu HH, Al-Muntasheri G (2016) Fracturing fluids effects on mechanical properties of organic rich shale. The 50th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium, Houston, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang ZN, Wang LM, Zhang GP, Ho C (2016) Micromechanical characterization of fluid-shale interactions via nanoindentation. In: SPE Asia Pacific hydraulic fracturing conference, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang YY, Chen M, Jin Y, Lu YH, Liang C, Wang D, Du X, Li WD (2016) The influence of oil-based drilling fluid on the wellbore instability and fracturing in complex shale formation. The 50th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium, Houston, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kang YL, Chen Q, You LJ, Lin C, Cheng QJ (2016) Laboratory studies of shale fracturing behaviors with rock-drilling fluid interactions. J China Univ Pet (Ed Nat Sci) 40(4):81–89Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kang YL, She JP, Lin C, You LJ (2016) Brittleness weakening mechanisms of shale soaked by drilling & completion fluid. Chin J Theor Appl Mech 48(3):730–738Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ling SX, Wu XY, Sun CW, Liao X, Ren Y, Li XN (2016) Experimental study of chemical damage and mechanical deterioration of black shale due to water-rock chemical action. J Exp Mech 31(4):511–524Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lin C (2015) Evaluation of organic rich shale brittleness and control of wellbore instability. Master thesis, Southwest Petroleum UniversityGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Franklin JA (1983) Suggested methods for determining the strength of rock materials in triaxial compression: revised version. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 20(6):285–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bieniawski ZT, Bernede MJ (1979) Suggested methods for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 16(2):137–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fairhurst CE, Hudson JA (1999) Draft ISRM suggested method for the complete stress-strain curve for intact rock in uniaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 36(3):281–289Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    She JP (2016) Catastrophic instability mechanism to system consisted of plugging zone and rock in shale formation. PhD thesis, Southwest Petroleum UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    You LJ, Kang YL, Chen ZX, Chen Q, Yang B (2014) Wellbore instability in shale gas wells drilled by oil-based fluids. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 72:294–299Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kang YL, Lin C, You LJ, Wang QZ, Chen Q (2015) Impacts of oil-based drilling/completion fluids invasion on the stress sensitivity of shale reservoirs. Nat Gas Ind 35(6):64–69Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hu DD, Benoit DN, Nguyen P, Gashimov R (2016) Quantitative analysis of proppant-formation interactions by digital rock methods. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Dubai, UAEGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pedlow J, Sharma M (2014) Changes in shale fracture conductivity due to interactions with water-based fluids. In: SPE hydraulic fracturing technology conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ali M, Hascakir B (2017) Water-rock interaction for eagle ford, Marcellus, green river, and Barnett shale samples. SPE J 22(1):162–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Lin
    • 1
  • Y. L. Kang
    • 1
  • L. J. You
    • 1
  • X. P. Yan
    • 1
  • Q. Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and ExploitationSouthwest Petroleum UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations