Advertisement

Logging Evaluation of Permeability in Heterogeneous Conglomerate Reservoir

  • Xiaoling Zhang
  • Danmei Li
  • Ming Zhang
  • Chunlei Li
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering book series (SSGG)

Abstract

Conglomerate reservoir is mainly delta-submarine fan deposits from Oligocene of Paleogene Formation. In WS field, formation thickness of upper sandstone and shale profile is very thin with lower lateral changed conglomerate and granite basement. Reservoir lithology is mainly pebbled sandstone, sandy conglomerate, and granitic conglomerate with poor sorting, angular-sub-angular, low textural maturity, and complex pore structure. Affected by high radioactive from basement, gamma-logging reading of lower conglomerate is very high (>400 gAPI), so shale content cannot be calculated with conventional interpretation equation of gamma ray. Reservoirs with the same porosity have different permeability which makes test and production show a lot of differences. Permeability calculated by the statistical regression equation of core porosity and permeability was not consistent with the actual well test and production history. According to the different sedimentary environment and pore structure characteristics, sand and conglomerate reservoirs are divided into five types of flow unit and respective permeability calculation model is set up by using flow unit analysis method and integrating dynamic and static data (core analysis, perforation test, and production). Permeability interpretation results considering test and production information shows higher agreement with dynamic data. This method can help divide reservoirs with different potentials and then provide favorable basis for adding perforation and increasing production during field development.

Keywords

Heterogeneous conglomerate Well logging Permeability Hydraulic flow unit 

References

  1. 1.
    Wang H, Wu X, Sun W et al (2008) Provenance of member 3 and member 4 + 5 in Yanchang Formation of Longdong Area in Ordos Basin. J Earth Sci Environ 30(1):38–43Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jian ZhengXianwei, Wu, Shenglin He et al (2016) Fine evaluation of permeability of conglomerate reservoir based on flow unit. J Jilin Univ (Earth Sci Ed) 46(1):286–294Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang L, Zhou C, Liu G et al (2006) Influence of pore structures on electric properties and well logging evaluation in low porosity and permeability reservoirs. Pet Explor Develop 33(6):671–676Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Busch JM, Fortney WG, Berry LN (1987) Determination of lithology from well logs by statistical analysis. In: SPEFE, pp 412–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Testman JD (1962) A statistical reservoir zonation technique. JPT Tans AIME 889–893Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stiles JH, Hutfilz JM (1992) The use of routine and special core analysis in characterizing Brent Group reservoir. UK North Sea, JPTGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Amaefule JO, Altunbay M, Tiab D et al (1993) Enhanced reservoir description: using core and log data to identify hydraulic(flow) units and predict permeability in unocored intervals/wells. In: SPE 26436, 68th SPE Meeting, Houston, Texas, pp 205–220Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Canas JA, Malik ZA, Wu CH (2000) Characterization of flow units in sandstone reservoir: La Cira field, Colombia, South America. In: SPE 27732, pp 883–891Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maghsood A, Fujii H, Fujimoto F (1995) Permeability prediction by hydraulic units—theory and application. In: SPE 30158, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gunter GW, Finneran JM, Hartmann DJ et al (1997) Early determination of reservoir flow units using an integrated petrophysical method. In: SPE 38679, pp 373–380Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    AloAljmi F, Holditch SA (2000) Permeability estimation using hydraulic flow units in a central Arabia reservoir. SPE 63254:1–14Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rincones JG, Delgado R, Ohen H et al (2000) Effective petrophysical fracture characterization using the Flow Unit Concept San Juan reservoir, Orocual field, Venezuela. In: SPE 63072, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Porras J, Campos O (2001) Rock typing: a key approach for petrophysical characterization and definition of flow units, Santa Babara field, Eastern Venezuela basin. In: SPE 69458, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Soto RB, Torres F, Arnge S (2001) Improved reservoir permeability models from flow units and Reforma-Libertad. In: SPE 69625, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Soto RB, Garcia JC, Torres F et al (2001) Permeability Prediction using hydraulic flow units and Hybrid Soft computing systems. In: SPE 71455, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Amaefule JO, Altunbay M, Tiab D et al (1993) Enhanced reservoir description: using core and log data to identify hydraulic (flow) units and predict permeability in uncored intervals/wells. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Houston, pp 1–16Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoling Zhang
    • 1
  • Danmei Li
    • 2
  • Ming Zhang
    • 1
  • Chunlei Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & DevelopmentBeijingChina
  2. 2.Petrochina International Companies (Indonesia)JakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations