Advertisement

Factors Affecting PDC Bit Directional Behaviors: Numerical Simulation and Applications

Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering book series (SSGG)

Abstract

This paper describes how a new bit–rock interaction model shows the combined effects of cutting structure design, gauge pad configuration, and depth of cut controllers (DOCC) on bit directional behaviors for polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) bits. Many elements of a typical PDC bit are used for directional drilling: cutters, DOCCs, and gauge pads. Bit directional behaviors include bit drilling efficiency, build rate, walk rate, and torque fluctuation. By simulating the bit–rock interaction, the forces acting on each element on the bit, such as steer force and walk force, can be calculated; therefore, each element’s contribution to bit directional behaviors is calculated. New force models of different types of elements have been derived from thousands of single element tests in the laboratory. Rock chips generated by each element can be modeled and removed by updating the bottomhole during bit–rock interaction. The removal of rock chips significantly changes the engagement of elements with rock. In this study, the following factors affecting PDC bit directional behaviors were simulated: (1) bit profile, (2) gauge pad configuration, (3) cutter layout, and (4) tip-ground level. This study shows that proper design of face aggressiveness, including bit profile, layout of cutters, and DOCCs, is crucial for determining a bit’s drilling efficiency. Gauge pad aggressiveness, particularly its length, is a key factor in determining bit directional behavior. The bit–rock interaction model has been validated by bit testing in a laboratory under controlled conditions. This paper presents several case studies to verify the model’s ability to determine steerability based on the design of PDC bits when used in rotary steerable systems (RSSs).

Keywords

PDC bits Directional drilling Steerability Bit walk Drilling efficiency 

References

  1. 1.
    Mensa-Wilmot G, Biju J et al (2006) Gage design-effects of gage pad length, geometry and activity (side cutting) on PDC bit stability, steerability, and borehole quality in rotary-steerable-drilling applications. In: IADC/SPE drilling conference, Miami, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dupriest F, Sowers S (2010) Maintaining steerability while extending gauge length to manage whirl. SPE Drilling Completion 25(02):263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perry C (1986) Directional drilling with PDC bits in the Gulf of Thailand. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robert S, Stroud D et al (2006) The effect of fixed-cutter-bit design features on the steerability and field performance of a point-the-bit rotary-steerable system. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bannerman JS (1990) Walk rate prediction on Alwyn North field by means of data analysis and 3D computer model. In: European petroleum conference, The Hague, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garza T, Wimberg J et al (2010) Continual bit design evolution improves performance in the Skinner Ridge Field—Piceance Basin. SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Morgantown, West Virginia, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Portillo O, Bahlany S et al (2011) Development and optimization of PDC bits for rotary steerable systems through unstable formations. In: SPE/IADC Middle East drilling technology conference and exhibition, Muscat, OmanGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Menand S, Sellami H et al (2003) How bit profile and gauges affect well trajectory. SPE Drilling Completion 18(01):22–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Menand S, Sellami H et al (2004) PDC bit classification according to steerability. SPE Drilling Completion 19(01):5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen S, Arfele R et al (2008) Reexamination of PDC-bit walk in directional and horizontal wells. In: IADC/SPE drilling conference, Orlando, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen S, Arfele R et al (2015) The role of rock-chip removals and cutting-area shapes in polycrystalline-diamond-compact-bit design optimization. SPE Drilling Completion 30(04):334–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen S, Arfele R et al (2013) A new theory on cutter layout for improving PDC bit performance in hard-and transit-formation drilling. SPE Drilling Completion 28(04):338–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yan W (1997) Single PDC cutter force modelling for hard rock cutting. PhD thesis, New Mexico Institute of Mining and TechnologyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Halliburton Drill Bits and ServicesConroeUSA

Personalised recommendations